Jump to content

34 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Transborderwife said:

Yes we aren't even 100 days in, we've still got years to go but do you plan on voting for him again?  Why or why not?  Are there any make it or break it things that would solidify your vote?

 

Genuine curiosity, not a red herring question 

Against Hillary without a doubt 

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

 I'm curious to see if Trump will have a challenger in the 2020 Republican primary. It's rare (for an incumbent president) but not unprecedented. If he falters or his popularity is low, someone might take a shot at him. 

Edited by Dakine10

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
Just now, Dakine10 said:

 I'm curious to see if Trump will have a challenger in the 2020 Republican primary. It's rare but not unprecedented. If he falters or his popularity is low, someone might take a shot at him. 

That would be interesting to see if anyone will challenge him, I think it really depends on how things shake out in the next two plus years.  It could be like the 1980 DNC primary with Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter which was pretty close for a sitting President seeking re-election.

 

As to my support, I will reserve my judgment until we get closer, it is much too early to tell, but as to biggest reason I voted for him this time, that person was just confirmed for SCOTUS. 

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Im all for sticking with your guy... the loyalty is admirable...

However he's doing Everything he promised to do?

drained the swamp?

repealed Obamacare on Day one... Day one people 

started building the wall... again day one 

 

Just the other day he was quoted as saying he wasn't the leader of the world (or something to that affect) yet not even a week later he takes the decision to bomb Syria.. yes he was against it previously but you can change your mind, but what changed his mind, what is his thought process for doing so now?

deflect from the chaos he faces at home perhaps?

he didn't go through either house to discuss it so as to get a consensus and understand what the policy is going forward. He has lacked that throughout, a clear strategy or policy on virtually everything.

 

he might get applauded for his tough stance but look behind the action and understand his motives. If he's decided on this because he's seen a few television pictures of distressed Syrians it's hardly a basis to conduct critical foreign policy is it.

a classic flip flop from him.

Given his record thus far he should be made to discuss any moves with both sets of houses first as if he's relying on the bunch of Ill informed, zero experience idiots he has surrounding him, Bannon,Kushner etc then it's a very slippery slope.

 

telling the media on every ocassion he's going to do great things abroad or domestically but he's not going to tell anyone is not what he's been voted in for because you can bet your bottom dollar he has no plans and is making it up as he goes along!

Edited by Inikamoze
Posted
2 minutes ago, Inikamoze said:

Im all for sticking with your guy... the loyalty is admirable...

However he's doing Everything he promised to do?

drained the swamp?

repealed Obamacare on Day one... Day one people 

started building the wall... again day one 

 

Just the other day he was quoted as saying he wasn't the leader of the world (or something to that affect) yet not even a week later he takes the decision to bomb Syria.. yes he was against it previously but you can change your mind, but what changed his mind, what is his thought process for doing so now?

deflect from the chaos he faces at home perhaps?

he didn't go through either house to discuss it so as to get a consensus and understand what the policy is going forward. He has lacked that throughout, a clear strategy or policy on virtually everything.

 

he might get applauded for his tough stance but look behind the action and understand his motives. If he's decided on this because he's seen a few television pictures of distressed Syrians it's hardly a basis to conduct critical foreign policy is it.

a classic flip flop from him.

Given his record thus far he should be made to discuss any moves with both sets of houses first as if he's relying on the bunch of I'll informed p, zero experience idiots he has surrounding him, Bannon,Kushner etc then it's a very slippery slope.

 

telling the media on every icassion he's going to do great things abroad or domestically but he's not going to tell anyone is not what he's been voted in for because you can bet your bottom dollar he has no plans and us making it up as he goes along!

Mod note... I do not have two accounts :jest:

Filed: Other Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

That would be interesting to see if anyone will challenge him, I think it really depends on how things shake out in the next two plus years.  It could be like the 1980 DNC primary with Ted Kennedy and Jimmy Carter which was pretty close for a sitting President seeking re-election.

 

As to my support, I will reserve my judgment until we get closer, it is much too early to tell, but as to biggest reason I voted for him this time, that person was just confirmed for SCOTUS. 

 

   I understand that part. I still find it more unexpected that Trump won the Republican nomination, than that he won the presidency. The presidential election is a partisan affair obviously and that's mostly what it came down to. The Republican primary was not though. In many ways it was kind of a blitzkrieg against the ill prepared, and I'm not sure if Trump can pull that off again, although I wouldn't bet against him.

QCjgyJZ.jpg

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, Inikamoze said:

Im all for sticking with your guy... the loyalty is admirable...

Hiwever he's doing Everything he promised to do?

drained the swamp?

repealed Obamacare on Day one... Day one people 

started building the wall... again day one 

 

Just the other day he was quoted as saying he wasn't the leader if the world (or something to that affect) yet not even a week later he takes the decision to bomb Syria.. yes he was against it previously but you can change your mind, but what chsnged his mind, what is his thought process for doing so now?

deflect from the chaos he faces at home perhaps?

he didn't go through either house to discuss it so as to get a consensus and understand what the policy is going forward. He lacked that throughout a clear strategy or policy on virtually everything.

 

ge might get applauded for his tough stance but look behind the action and understand his motives. If he's decided on this because he's seen a few television pictures of distressed Syrians it's hardly a basis to conduct critical foreign policy is it.

a classic flip flop from him.

Given his record thus far he should be made to discuss any moves with both sets of houses first as if he's relying on the bunch of I'll informed p, zero experience idiots he has surrounding him, Bannon,Kushner etc then it's a very slippery slope.

 

telling the media on every icassion he's going to do great things abroad or domestically but he's not going to tell anyone is not what he's been voted in for because you can bet your bottom dollar he has no plans and us making it up as he goes along!

To be fair, a lot of day one promises I think were not believed by intelligent supporters.  A lot of people point to DACA as a promise not kept.  Well, DACA is a DHS memo, not an executive order, so he couldn't dismantle it on day one.

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

I would bet against it.

He basically hijacked the party. Many many people do not stand side by side with his views on a range of subjects and I would be livid if he's what is meant to represent my political affiliation (some all of their lives).

He saw a party in disarray and took full advantage to use it as a conduit to sit in the Oval Office. I'm amazed at how proud so many people are that this man and his character is regarded as the most qualified (in their eyes) to lead the nation.

he wants his place in history whatever the cost. If he makes a few million whilst in office then do much the better. You can bet your life he will rinse every last dime out once he leaves office that is for sure.

 

50 years ago or more if anyone had encouraged Russia to carry out espionage on US citizens he might have been strung up! 

All those supporters who deny how deeply in bed he is with Putin hasn't got the American values to their hearts if you ask me. He's made treasonous comments and maybe worse to follow after the investigations. 

I say to all those people You are the most unpatriotic civilians this nation has ever witnessed.

Edited by Inikamoze
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

The purpose of this thread is to hear whether Trump supporters would do so again.  Plenty of other threads here in which to bash him.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
Just now, TBoneTX said:

The purpose of this thread is to hear whether Trump supporters would do so again.  Plenty of other threads here in which to bash him.

I was actually about to say that but feared it was overextending and encouraging the "don't post" tos VIO 😳

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Plagiarism, TBW ma'am!  Reported!!!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)

[Mod hat on]

Two off-topic posts have been removed.

[Mod hat off]

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...