Cologne attacks: mayor lambasted for telling women to keep men at arm's length

[Darnell 8,478]

eh - no 'talks' at the Sharia Council of Cologne, prior; seemingly...

Apparently the behavior by the mens is 'normal' for them, a culturally accepted 'norm'. I think they're stupid, moronic enough to not recognize they ain't inside of their 'culture' anymore. I am thinking, instead, that 'this' was an initiation rite into the existing human trafficking/sex slave crews that exist nearby.

What would a CABA chick do, when accosted in this fashion? Pull a pistol and start firing? Use a Stun Gun? Remove a machete from the Uggs Boots and start hacking and slashing?

Edited January 6, 2016 by Darnell

[smilesammich 10,727]

What would a CABA chick do, when accosted in this fashion? Pull a pistol and start firing? Use a Stun Gun? Remove a machete from the Uggs Boots and start hacking and slashing?

perplexing innit. what would caba do??

[lostinblue 1,989]

If the authorities cannot keep women safe – eventually German men will form gangs that will. At that point the authorities will wish they had arrested the attackers when they had their chance.

They imported a culture without understanding the culture

[Darnell 8,478]

oooo - German Mens Gangs - I'm all up for that ! lots of medieval hardware stored in the castles - break out the gear !

[lostinblue 1,989]

[Darnell 8,478]

thanks for the Vid, LostInBlue - the shootings between 9 to 10 pm were new to me.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

eh - no 'talks' at the Sharia Council of Cologne, prior; seemingly...

Apparently the behavior by the mens is 'normal' for them, a culturally accepted 'norm'. I think they're stupid, moronic enough to not recognize they ain't inside of their 'culture' anymore. I am thinking, instead, that 'this' was an initiation rite into the existing human trafficking/sex slave crews that exist nearby.

What would a CABA chick do, when accosted in this fashion? Pull a pistol and start firing? Use a Stun Gun? Remove a machete from the Uggs Boots and start hacking and slashing?

I agree with most of what you say above (not sure about the human trafficking). It's a despicable side effect that comes from being raised in societies that give lip service to praising women as special creatures, yet treat them in reality like dirt. Nothing good comes from repressing a woman's right to agency as a human being because "it's for her own good." Instead you get this -- women as disposable objects that can be violated without compunction. Disgusting. Everyone knows I am firmly in the muddy left ditch and fear not the Muslimy Muslims, but this is foul. It is not up to a woman to keep at arm's length from anyone "for her own good" -- it's up to men to be human beings and JUST NOT RAPE.

[ExPatty 502]

Everyone knows I am firmly in the muddy left ditch and fear not the Muslimy Muslims, but this ###### is foul. It is not up to a woman to keep at arm's length from anyone "for her own good" -- it's up to men to be human beings and JUST NOT RAPE.

But you must realize this is a direct offshoot of their religion; mistreating women is part and parcel of islam. It is endemic in the religion. Like you said, lip service is paid, but truth rings out.

Many muslims as in all religions choose to ignore parts of their text and so will not treat women badly, but a significant percent do--significant enough that it is codified in many countries. The koran grants men a higher status than women, says in inheritance they should get more than women, says their mind is deficient to that of men, makes them property of conquerors in war, condones hitting one's wife, and marrying prepubescent girls. All these men are doing is what they've been taught. When ISIS treats women as sexual slaves it pulls directly, literally from the koran.

And this is why I pointed out earlier the challenge confronting people on the west who want to open their arms to immigration from certain nations where women are treated like cattle, yet also further women's rights.

Edited January 6, 2016 by ExPatty

[Rob L 3,811]

But you must realize this is a direct offshoot of their religion; mistreating women is part and parcel of islam. It is endemic in the religion. Like you said, lip service is paid, but truth rings out.

When did you study the Koran to determine what was part and what was parcel?

[ExPatty 502]

When did you study the Koran to determine what was part and what was parcel?

Are you denying the examples I just gave as coming directly from the koran?

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

They were not real Muslims

[smilesammich 10,727]

But you must realize this is a direct offshoot of their religion; mistreating women is part and parcel of islam. It is endemic in the religion. Like you said, lip service is paid, but truth rings out.

Many muslims as in all religions choose to ignore parts of their text and so will not treat women badly, but a significant percent do--significant enough that it is codified in many countries. The koran grants men a higher status than women, says in inheritance they should get more than women, says their mind is deficient to that of men, makes them property of conquerors in war, condones hitting one's wife, and marrying prepubescent girls. All these men are doing is what they've been taught. When ISIS treats women as sexual slaves it pulls directly, literally from the koran.

And this is why I pointed out earlier the challenge confronting people on the west who want to open their arms to immigration from certain nations where women are treated like cattle, yet also further women's rights.

everything you're mentioning from the koran can be pulled from the bible too. big old religions are patriarchal and treat women as tools to be used by men. these books come from a time when women were possessions, so not really surprising women still get treated as such - everyone is still following the same archaic religions and leaving the nasty "sell your daughter's virginity to get out of a bind" parts of their scripture up to individual interpretation.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

everything you're mentioning from the koran can be pulled from the bible too. big old religions are patriarchal and treat women as tools to be used by men. these books come from a time when women were possessions, so not really surprising women still get treated as such - everyone is still following the same archaic religions and leaving the nasty "sell your daughter's virginity to get out of a bind" parts of their scripture up to individual interpretation.

Watched this last night. Still topical.

[ExPatty 502]

everything you're mentioning from the koran can be pulled from the bible too. big old religions are patriarchal and treat women as tools to be used by men. these books come from a time when women were possessions, so not really surprising women still get treated as such - everyone is still following the same archaic religions and leaving the nasty "sell your daughter's virginity to get out of a bind" parts of their scripture up to individual interpretation.

Except jews are not citing the old testament as they stone people and cut body parts off.

Your argument pleads that there is no difference in religions or their acolytes despite a preponderance of evidence to the contrary.

Edited January 6, 2016 by ExPatty

[smilesammich 10,727]

Watched this last night. Still topical.

indeed.

america has a ripe underbelly of culturally acceptable misogyny, and it got so sweet and palatable from our extra sturdy roots in christianity.