Would you support more restrictions on guns in your state?

[Karee 4,190]

Would you support more restrictions on guns in your state?

[OriZ 3,157]

Absolutely not. Getting Vermonters to give up their guns is like getting them to give up their heroine. Wait, what?

[Boiler 45,686]

Colorado has already done so.

[MyLittlePony 340]

I voted YES i hate guns and people dont handle gun responsibly well.

[OriZ 3,157]

That's a well thought reason: I hate guns.

I hate cigarettes so I don't think anyone should be allowed to smoke.

[DavenRoxy 1,073]

I voted YES i hate guns and people I don't handle gun responsibly well.

Fixxored for you.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I support anything that limits your ability to shoot me.

[Boiler 45,686]

I support anything that limits your ability to shoot me.

Like if you went on a diet or were required to wear cammo gear?

[LibCampFireClub 635]

I vote for more restrictions, more regulations, shorter work days, more vacation days, higher pay, rules to make life fair, an international ban on bad an mean people, more tolerance for stupidity, censorship and controls to prevent and intimidate conservative politics, higher taxes on rich and successful people, free food, free beer, free rent, and a free ride.

Edited December 21, 2014 by ExExpat

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I support anything that limits your ability to shoot me.

Welcome back. How have you been?

[MyLittlePony 340]

Fixxored for you.

Speaking for yourself?

[MyLittlePony 340]

Fixxored for you.

Speaking for yourself?

[Sousuke 1,214]

I had an interesting conversation this weekend. Was talking to someone about an Australian type gun ban (where everything is pretty much outlawed but bolt action rifles for hunting). The argument was that the 2nd amendment should be heavily limited because it places a burden on local communities. A small percentage of people owning firearms cause harm etc.

My response was that we should also then curtail 1st amendment rights to protest because protests can lead to property loss and loss of one's livelyhood.

There was a pause in in the conversation, and then finally they said that monetary loss / lost jobs doesn't equate to loss lives.

My response was 'Well fair enough - you know people get killed during or because of protests right? Either directly like in past situations at Frank Ogawa Plaza, or indirectly because either emergency services are rerouted or blocked.

Personally I am pro rights for all.

Edited December 22, 2014 by Sousuke

[Boiler 45,686]

There were 4 police outriders hurt in a protest in Denver, one very seriously.

Time for a ban?

The number of protestors are tiny compared to legal gun owners.

Edited December 22, 2014 by Boiler

[SMOKE 1,426]

I can't add a poll answer to this one. you know what it would be.