Case on suspension?

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

Head is spinning righ now... My fiancé had his interview today in Ciudad Juarez. I have not had a chance to thoroughly discuss how it went, but he told me that his case was suspended and that we had to re-schedule another interview when we were ready. Is this bad news?

[vicmar 0]

Did they give a reason as why it was suspended?

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

My fiancé didn't give me the reason yet, but I am guessing that it is for an incomplete case since we have to reschedule when we are ready, but I will get more info tonight.

[vicmar 0]

So they didn’t give him a waiver then?

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

No. No waiver. Apparently, we have tot go back to a follow up interview TOGETHER.

This is totally yanking my hair because I don't have time to go because of school until December.

Are follow up interviews bad news?

[vicmar 0]

I would be relief they didn’t give him a waiver. To go back for a follow up interview and for the both of you to be in the interview doesn’t sound bad at all. I wish I could go in to the interview with my hubby since I am more inform of the case and know every document in case they ask for any. Don’t stress it too much I am sure everything will be fine, try to schedule another interview soon and hopefully you get it soon. I am in the same boat at you with school is hard to take time off, but my professors understand and allow me to miss class and go over with me what I missed once I get back from my husband’s interview. Just talk to you professors in case you get the follow up interview during school time I am sure they would understand.

[vicmar 0]

I’ve heard in some interview they would ask if the petitioner is there and if the beneficiary says yes they ask to bring in the petitioner in. So maybe they ask him if you were there and he said no, if you would have been there then maybe there wouldn’t have been a need for a follow up interview since they would have called you in.

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

Thank you so much Vicmar! I feel much better. I was so upset earlier today. I hope they don't mention waivers, although he may need one. All this time waiting, it's killing me. Also, thank you for the suggestion about talking to my professors. My fiancé wants to get this done as soon as possible, so I might have to go when school is in session.

I had a feeling that I would have to go, since I was the one putting all the paperwork together, and of the two, I am the one who keeps everything in order, I just never expected a follow up.

[TBoneTX 45,329]

Unless someone who's very familiar with patterns at Juarez can authoritatively state differently, alarm bells should be going off. Read this thread, in this same forum:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/207292-embassy-wants-petitioner-at-next-cr-1-interview-any-advice/

I would prepare very thoroughly for a Stokes interview.

Your fiance should tell you EVERY question that he was asked, EVERY answer he gave, and EVERY reaction that he noticed from the consul. Write these down NOW, while they're freshly in mind. Then, research "Stokes interview" in the Advanced Search field at upper right of any VJ screen, and read thoroughly.

[KayDeeCee 4,893]

I completely agree with TBone. This is not typical for Juarez but did almost happen in my husband's case 3 years ago. The CO asked if I was there, then continued to ask when I would be able to be there, in 2 days? 2 weeks? a month? My husband told him he could not answer for me and would need to speak me about it but he thought I could work something out to be there as soon as possible. He seemed okay with that final response because he dropped that and ended up approving him anyway.

Go over every single detail of your fiance's interview. You need to know every question asked and every answer he provided to each and every question. There must have been something that made the CO feel the need for you to be present. Do you have any red flags in your case that you know of?

Gather plenty of relationship evidence and research about Stokes interviews where they separate you, ask you each questions and expect all your answers to match. I honestly have not read of this happening in the reviews that people post here on VJ about their interviews, but we are only a small percentage of the people that go through CDJ. It is possible they will want to interview you together and not separate you, but it is best to prepare for the worst and hope for the best. Gather everything you need and schedule your second interview as soon as you are able to attend. Sorry this is happening to you two.

[Jawaree 717]

You have to show up, he cant leave U outside claiming he

came alone, that will cause more delays possible red flags..

I think u both been *STOKED*

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

Unless someone who's very familiar with patterns at Juarez can authoritatively state differently, alarm bells should be going off. Read this thread, in this same forum:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/207292-embassy-wants-petitioner-at-next-cr-1-interview-any-advice/

I would prepare very thoroughly for a Stokes interview.

Your fiance should tell you EVERY question that he was asked, EVERY answer he gave, and EVERY reaction that he noticed from the consul. Write these down NOW, while they're freshly in mind. Then, research "Stokes interview" in the Advanced Search field at upper right of any VJ screen, and read thoroughly.

Oh my God! Thank you so much! I figured after talking to my fiancé that it was bad news.

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

I completely agree with TBone. This is not typical for Juarez but did almost happen in my husband's case 3 years ago. The CO asked if I was there, then continued to ask when I would be able to be there, in 2 days? 2 weeks? a month? My husband told him he could not answer for me and would need to speak me about it but he thought I could work something out to be there as soon as possible. He seemed okay with that final response because he dropped that and ended up approving him anyway.

Go over every single detail of your fiance's interview. You need to know every question asked and every answer he provided to each and every question. There must have been something that made the CO feel the need for you to be present. Do you have any red flags in your case that you know of?

Gather plenty of relationship evidence and research about Stokes interviews where they separate you, ask you each questions and expect all your answers to match. I honestly have not read of this happening in the reviews that people post here on VJ about their interviews, but we are only a small percentage of the people that go through CDJ. It is possible they will want to interview you together and not separate you, but it is best to prepare for the worst and hope for the best. Gather everything you need and schedule your second interview as soon as you are able to attend. Sorry this is happening to you two.

Thank you so much for the info! I'm devastated.

I am not 100% sure, but from what my fiancé to me this was the issue:

The CO asked why he left the U.S. and returned to Mexico. My fiancé left in March 2012 to Mexico because he was homesick and he wanted to be home by his mom's birthday (in March). This didn't make any sense to the CO. Then, I am not sure why the CO assumed that we were talking from March to August(of 2012), when we got engaged. The CO asked him, "You were engaged after only 5 months?" My fiancé told him that we had been talking since April 2010. The CO then asked him if we ever saw each other while my fiancé was in the U.S., which we didn't. He lived in Nebraska and I live in California and for various reasons we never saw each other. My fiancé mentioned that I had a boyfriend in that time, so we did not see each other. The CO left and came back and gave him a paper with info to reschedule a follow up interview.

[KayDeeCee 4,893]

Thank you so much for the info! I'm devastated.

I am not 100% sure, but from what my fiancé to me this was the issue:

The CO asked why he left the U.S. and returned to Mexico. My fiancé left in March 2012 to Mexico because he was homesick and he wanted to be home by his mom's birthday (in March). This didn't make any sense to the CO. Then, I am not sure why the CO assumed that we were talking from March to August(of 2012), when we got engaged. The CO asked him, "You were engaged after only 5 months?" My fiancé told him that we had been talking since April 2010. The CO then asked him if we ever saw each other while my fiancé was in the U.S., which we didn't. He lived in Nebraska and I live in California and for various reasons we never saw each other. My fiancé mentioned that I had a boyfriend in that time, so we did not see each other. The CO left and came back and gave him a paper with info to reschedule a follow up interview.

It seems the CO wants to interview you both to see if the timeline of your relationship matches and exactly how it played out. I think talking to each other for a couple years while he was in the US, but never meeting in person during that time, and you having another boyfriend then set off alarm bells for the CO.

You waited until he went back to Mexico, and then you went to see him in person for the first time and got engaged then too? Was this because you no longer had a boyfriend and so decided the two of you now wanted to be together romantically? I think it was not made clear to the CO what the evolution of your relationship was.

I really think you should plan for them to separate you, ask you both questions and your answers need to match. They will most likely ask a lot about your relationship timeline and you being involved with someone else while he was in the US. I do not think the CO is convinced you are a real couple. You would have to overcome that and prove that you are. I think it would not be a bad idea to get a free consultation from an immigration attorney(or 2) and see what they think and advise on the matter.

Here is a worst case review of a couple that had a Stokes for their K-1. It might be helpful to prepare yourself for what could happen > http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/354172-inappropriate-interview/

[Vanessa + Mario 4]

It seems the CO wants to interview you both to see if the timeline of your relationship matches and exactly how it played out. I think talking to each other for a couple years while he was in the US, but never meeting in person during that time, and you having another boyfriend then set off alarm bells for the CO.

You waited until he went back to Mexico, and then you went to see him in person for the first time and got engaged then too? Was this because you no longer had a boyfriend and so decided the two of you now wanted to be together romantically? I think it was not made clear to the CO what the evolution of your relationship was.

I really think you should plan for them to separate you, ask you both questions and your answers need to match. They will most likely ask a lot about your relationship timeline and you being involved with someone else while he was in the US. I do not think the CO is convinced you are a real couple. You would have to overcome that and prove that you are. I think it would not be a bad idea to get a free consultation from an immigration attorney(or 2) and see what they think and advise on the matter.

Here is a worst case review of a couple that had a Stokes for their K-1. It might be helpful to prepare yourself for what could happen > http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/354172-inappropriate-interview/

Thank you so much. All this time I kept thinking that the nightmare was over, and it seems like it is just beginning.