Visa Journey Timeline Accuracy Question

[Glyn and Kathy 288]

And I guess you're petitioning for a "Fiancee's visa" but you're commenting on a "Spouse's Visa" forum, so that makes you wrong too for sticking your nose where you shouldn't.

"it will happen when it happens" ... you couldn't have been more rude with your comment. Thanks and back to you buddy!

Really? LMAO....

Last time I checked...the boards were open for all to post. Especially when the posts end up on the "popular topics" page. I never look to see what forum the post is on...I just read what seems interesting.

[Harpa Timsah 13,258]

I think it has something to do with this, but I have not heard back from the management on it.

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/347877-new-faux-dcf-buttonindication/

[natty bumppo 297]

ooh.. my bad! :rofl:

its not rude.. it called being patient.. thats all that is.. there is no need to get hostile, it will only make your wait more intolerable and make you even more bitter..

just be patient, it will HAPPEN WHEN IT HAPPENS

[Gosia & Tito 199]

So your NOA2 should be coming up soon. That's awesome. I guess we all have to pay the painful price of having to be away for so long from our spouses. Just looking for some encouragement since I'm just starting the process.

The encouragement is that while there is a long wait, the process for the K-1 and IR/CR are relatively short (outside of expedites) and almost guaranteed -unless lies or other legal problems and I mean serious ones exist. Check how long it takes for other kind of immigrant visas if you would and you might be surprised.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

Action taken and complete. We always welcome feedback (and if I miss it then post again!). I have changed the DCF field in the timeline to now read:

IR-1/CR-1 Visa Filed by US Citizen Petitioner Living Abroad?

**If filing for a IR-1/CR-1 Visa and the US Citizen petitioner lives (and files for the visa) abroad then please make that selection here (and ensure you select the IR-1/CR-1 Visa type):

This should get people filling out the form correctly and reduce any "skew" in the timelines. I may also send out an email blast to all folks with this visa category to come and update (which would then start to fix up any erroneous entries.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

I will clean up the many areas in the timelines to rephrase as well. The entry page (most important to fix first) is now corrected. I am now going to also look at the statistical distribution on times. If the overseas filings are "much" shorter than typical state side filings I can put a condition in the timeline stats, graphs and estimates to automatically filter them out when generating those items!

@AlexanderdiGreat, thanks for the heads up! I hope these changes help!!

[brian_n_phuong 193]

I will clean up the many areas in the timelines to rephrase as well. The entry page (most important to fix first) is now corrected. I am now going to also look at the statistical distribution on times. If the overseas filings are "much" shorter than typical state side filings I can put a condition in the timeline stats, graphs and estimates to automatically filter them out when generating those items!

Captain Ewok makes final adjustments to the Visajourney Timeline Computational Registers.

All Visajourney Adjustments are first tested on our valiant and brave Moderator Staff

and Finally, with the Timeline Formula declared stable, it is released to the Visajourney Public

Yes Kids.... Captain Ewok is here to Serve You! Better Immigration through Science

Edited February 11, 2012 by brian_n_phuong

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

hey you're not supposed to show the mod ban gun! that's a super secret black project!

[Gosia & Tito 199]

Captain Ewok makes final adjustments to the Visajourney Timeline Computational Registers.

The wiring to the relay next to your left hand needs to be swapped with the one immediately below it, that is, otherwise it will report NOA2 to be approved in 5 days!

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

I'd like to let everyone know that I am currently working to improve the statistical accuracy of the timelines . I will be releasing an upgraded algorithm shortly that I hope improves accuracy of the graphs and approval estimates!

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I'd like to let everyone know that I am currently working to improve the statistical accuracy of the timelines . I will be releasing an upgraded algorithm shortly that I hope improves accuracy of the graphs and approval estimates!

Is it heavily weighted toward more recent data, while still being predominately influenced by historic trends?

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

Is it heavily weighted toward more recent data, while still being predominately influenced by historic trends?

I don't understand; can you rephrase?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I don't understand; can you rephrase?

It's math humor.

[Shoot Em Straight 385]

I will clean up the many areas in the timelines to rephrase as well. The entry page (most important to fix first) is now corrected. I am now going to also look at the statistical distribution on times. If the overseas filings are "much" shorter than typical state side filings I can put a condition in the timeline stats, graphs and estimates to automatically filter them out when generating those items!

@AlexanderdiGreat, thanks for the heads up! I hope these changes help!!

Forgive me if this has been offered before as a suggestion or I am way off...but is there a big ratio throwing off the timelines from that are NOT filled in??

Meaning..would it be a possibility to obtain a more accurate estimate to make it not a option but mandatory to fill out a timeline when you join as a member?

BTW

Please if anyone knows why one would not find ok to fill out there timeline..enlighten me. Otherwise, doesn't it benefit all in the long run?

Edited February 13, 2012 by inluvnwaiting

[TBoneTX 45,284]

It's math humor.

A mathematician, a biologist, and a physicist are sitting in a street cafe, watching people going into and coming out of the house on the other side of the street. First, they see two people going into the house. After a while, they notice three people coming out of the house.

The physicist says, "The measurement wasn't accurate."

The biologist says, "They have reproduced."

The mathematician says, "If now exactly one person enters the house, then it will be empty again."