I found this post.. and thought it would be helpful

[Mark + Melissa 49]

Sometimes we get so caught up in our own little world, we sort of need reminding of what the service centers go through. I found this post by HuskyKeive that states (as of 2007) what the process was for processing an application, and thought I would share it. Of course, I was seeking something to understand what happens when we send petitions to this blackhole called a service center and waith for 6-8 months for a reply..

Seems to me that perhaps (given how some people have waited nearly 8 months) the adjudicator actually need an aging report so that they can work on RFE's first thing, and clear those off. *shrugs* just a thought..

Anyway, here's the post, and to HuskyKiev.. if you're still around, thank you for your frank and honest answers!

Well lets see how much I remember...

Maybe it might be easier if I just described what I would do to approve a petition - my process.

First, I would select a case file/folder. All petitions/files are kept in folders that a have a scanable bar code identifier. This folder has everything that a person submits on the left side of the folder and all the agency generated documents on the right side. They should be in date order, Petition and then most recent from top to bottom. The left side has the pictures on top.

You begin by looking at the petition for correctness by checking the information via several databases depending upon what type of petition you are adjudicating. Also if the form was complete and everything was in order. Descrepancies in peoples names from what the database had vs. what the petition said, birth dates, things like that all had to be resolved and could generate a RFE if the adjudicator couldn't figure it out with the tools he had.

There were some standard criminal and background type databases that were required for all petitions. A "hit" in any of these databases would flag the petition and it would be sent to a special group who worked to resolve why the "hit" occurred. Sometimes it could be something simple as a similar name of a bad guy, but every hit had to be resolved.

I remember that certain surnames would invariably cause a hit, but they could be resolved rather quickly by comparing the applicants background information with those of the "hit" name. There were various ways to do this of course, and it took time. Thats why some applications take longer to process because there are stumbling blocks along the way that must be worked through before approval. Consequently, all the other petitions that the officer was working get set to the side. or, the adjudicator/officer might set the difficult one to the side and work on less complicated ones. Remember it was a production environment where you had to be accurate but fast. Getting a petition kicked back for mistakes to be re-worked hurt your overall stats, so, you tried to be a thorough as you could, but also as quick as you could.

After clearing a applicant through the various mandatory database searches, then you could begin to review the various information on the petition. Sometimes there would be stupid mistakes like forgetting to sign it, or using a copy when an original signature was required etc... Kinda careless mistakes or from not really understanding the instructions type of thing. Anyway, these would generate an RFE, and the file's staus would be update in the computer as awaiting repsonse to RFE or something like that, I don't recall the exact terminology.

Anyway, instead of sending the newly RFE'd file back to the large file storage area, it would be kept at the officers desk in a holding cue. Then when an RFE reply would come in, I wpuld pull it (the file) off the shelf and rework it. I tried to clear all my answered RFE's out first thing every morning because it was "old" work as compared to the dates I was working at the time. If the RFE had the required information, it would continue to be processed and/or approved and sent on its way. If the RFE did not address the item, then another RFE would be generated and back on the shelf it would go.

A word about RFE's. It was my experience that no two officers would always see eye to eye on if an RFE was required. Some officers could or would spend some more time digging around the file or a database to find the information (if they thought it could be found) and others would just as soon rip off an RFE. So it varied. Then there were some times that an RFE was required because of the situation. Again, it depends a lot on who was looking at your case and what the question was / what information was needed. No hard and fast rule.

Also, each adjudicator/officer had a master list of RFE "phrases that they could pull off thier computer and plug into a standard RFE form depending upon the situation. Each of these "phrases" could be further "wordsmithed" to suit a particular situation. Again depends on the officer. Thats why you may see some RFE's that are similar but not exact. We would borrow each others RFE phrases to add to our list as we came across one that fit a particular situation.

It would be like "Hey, cube mate. I've got this situation, do you have anything in your RFE library that might fit?" answer "Sure, try this one. I'll email it to you". And thats how that worked.

You asked about country of birth etc.. Yes and no. There were "watch lists" of certain countries that meant that certain procedures had to be followed when processing petitions from these countries, but it was just a couple more things to check/verify along the approval process. It didn't slow things down dramatically. So, I wouldn't worry about that being a big factor.

Additional review. Mainly if you came up as a "hit" for a surname of a bad guy (or gal) that would have to be resolved. Marriage Fraud. Overstaying your visit. Lying. Criminal activity/organized crime, police reports, things that would be outside of a "normal" person's life you might say.

So back to the approval process. So if no RFE was needed then i would "approve' the petition, affix my stamp with my identifier # , sign and date it. I would then scan the file, update the status and send it on its wayto the next stop wherever that was. Actually, all the approved petitions/files were placed in a separate box and those were collected as you went along and taken for final disposition/processing.

Then you start all over again with the next case...

[JohnandWendyB 21]

Sometimes we get so caught up in our own little world, we sort of need reminding of what the service centers go through. I found this post by HuskyKeive that states (as of 2007) what the process was for processing an application, and thought I would share it. Of course, I was seeking something to understand what happens when we send petitions to this blackhole called a service center and waith for 6-8 months for a reply..

Seems to me that perhaps (given how some people have waited nearly 8 months) the adjudicator actually need an aging report so that they can work on RFE's first thing, and clear those off. *shrugs* just a thought..

Anyway, here's the post, and to HuskyKiev.. if you're still around, thank you for your frank and honest answers!

Thanks for posting this!!! . I think this is very helpful. Have a great new year and good luck!

[brian_n_phuong 193]

Great Post. Nice view from behind the curtain

[dwheels76 5,468]

What an excellent post and it makes since. I can only imagine the mountain of files and fancy ways people send in their petition files and here's the poor clerk just looking at it.

But I sure would like to know why sometimes some petitions just get sent in and approved within 2 weeks that's been happening a lot lately.

Now I for one can't complain I haven't even sent our stuff in (will do it next week hopefully).

But with me being the US Citizen wife married to the highest fraud visa country Nigeria. We probably will be in that line that checks out everything.

It will be interesting.

Thank you to HuskyKeive where ever you are this sure helps to understand it all. And thank you for being so honest and straight forward.

[brian_n_phuong 193]

But I sure would like to know why sometimes some petitions just get sent in and approved within 2 weeks that's been happening a lot lately.

.

Mostly Military stationed overseas, and some hardship cases.

I was previously married to a foreign national when I was stationed in Europe in the Air Force. I received orders that required my family to return to the US in 45 days. With the priority classification I completed the entire process from filing to Visa in under three weeks! It's not matter of getting preferential treatment, and its only allowed when there are extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the petitioner.

[Eddie&A 5]

Thank you for posting this. It helps me understand more clearly what the USCIS officer does before a petition is approved. Thanks also to Husky Kieve