Can AQ shut the Conspiracy Nuts Up?

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Osama Bin Laden's Death Confirmed By Al Qaeda

So, is he dead now or is the tin foil hat crowd going to say that AQ is in bed with the gubmint and cooperating in this conspiracy?

[^_^ 5,021]

No. AQ is just a CIA front.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Oh, great! Now, what are you going to use as an authoritative source next? Wikipedia?

[Vi-Jay 218]

I am amazed.

You turned criticism about the Obama-mama administration incompetent handling of the media event into conspiracy theory rants.

and, Your thread title is a plea to the "nuts" to "shut up".

Isn't it absolutely terrible that it takes AQ to provide the evidence?

Isn't it terrible that AQ gave you your thread?

Isn't it terrbile that AQ is the "proof" some need?

AQ has made us all believer's!

My complaints and criticism were never about wether UBL is dead or alive.

My criticism is about the Obama-mama elitist mentality and foolish / incompetent handling of the media event.

It's a sad and crazy day if our enemy makes us believe our Prez.

and, You're proudly preaching it! Kudos!

[^_^ 5,021]

I am amazed.

You turned criticism about the Obama-mama administration incompetent handling of the media event into conspiracy theory rants.

and, Your thread title is a plea to the "nuts" to "shut up".

Isn't it absolutely terrible that it takes AQ to provide the evidence?

Isn't it terrible that AQ gave you your thread?

Isn't it terrbile that AQ is the "proof" some need?

AQ has made us all believer's!

My complaints and criticism were never about wether UBL is dead or alive.

My criticism is about the Obama-mama elitist mentality and foolish / incompetent handling of the media event.

It's a sad and crazy day if our enemy makes us believe our Prez.

and, You're proudly preaching it! Kudos!

The emoticon crazed I-hit-enter-way-too-much nutjob has a point.

Edited May 6, 2011 by \

[Vi-Jay 218]

The emoticon crazed I-hit-enter-way-too-much nutjob has a point.

Thanks!

[Obama 2012 1,714]

No. AQ is just a CIA front.

Pretty much.

[Zero Sum 305]

More reason to get Congress to stop funding them ...

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

More reason to get Congress to stop funding them ...

They are independently financed by drug sales to minority youth in Los Angeles.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/War%20on%20Drugs%20Scam/maxine_waters.htm

[Zero Sum 305]

They are independently financed by drug sales to minority youth in Los Angeles.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/War%20on%20Drugs%20Scam/maxine_waters.htm

Oil money too. But being a supposed CIA front, they are therefore supposed to be publicly funded. Paul needs to post more about how that bothers him.

[Danno 1,228]

I never doubted he was dead because....who would tell a lie which hinged on Obama not showing himself in public?

However, I do love those who were silent so long while the "Truthers" reigned supreme among his midst.

... yet now when "Their guy"is running things... anyone who questions the transparency of Washington.... has a tin foil hat on.

The loyalty is getting comical.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

My complaints and criticism were never about wether UBL is dead or alive.

Did you feel addressed as a conspiracy nut? Why? And if you did, why would you complain to me about that?

It's a sad and crazy day if our enemy makes us believe our Prez.

Did the enemy make you believe the President? That's on you, isn't it? I didn't need AQ to state that OBL was gone. I got that news from credible sources last Sunday evening. How about you?

[Vi-Jay 218]

Did you feel addressed as a conspiracy nut? Why? And if you did, why would you complain to me about that?

You forget your comments to me, yesterday, regarding "tin foil hat"?

Did the enemy make you believe the President? That's on you, isn't it? I didn't need AQ to state that OBL was gone. I got that news from credible sources last Sunday evening. How about you?

You seem to be having some difficulty identifying my use of sarcasm. Perhaps I am failing to communicate clearly? I'm using emoticons to help distinguish my serious comments from my dry wit sarcasm. How might I help you understand me more clearly?

No, you are the one using an AQ statement as evidence. It's on you.