Jump to content
Ban Hammer

House Votes To Forcibly Extract DNA From Those Accused Of Serious Crimes

 Share

  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. If arrested (not convicted) dna should be taken and kept in a national database,

    • agree with this
      14
    • disagree with this
      12


9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

see http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/257435-house-votes-to-forcibly-extract-dna-from-those-accused-of-serious-crimes/

not a public poll, btw. your vote cannot be seen.

Edited by charles!

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Benin
Timeline

This is a tough one. I want to agree with it, but on principle, I had to disagree with it. It is possible that I could be convinced, but since I don't really have to decide, I will stick with the principles of civil liberties and vote disagree.

AOS Timeline

4/14/10 - Packet received at Chicago Lockbox at 9:22 AM (Day 1)

4/24/10 - Received hardcopy NOAs (Day 10)

5/14/10 - Biometrics taken. (Day 31)

5/29/10 - Interview letter received 6/30 at 10:30 (Day 46)

6/30/10 - Interview: 10:30 (Day 77) APPROVED!!!

6/30/10 - EAD received in the mail

7/19/10 - GC in hand! (Day 96) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What this seems to show is that more people than not are not really very aware as to what it would be like where there to be a shift to a more systemic assumption of guilt when arrested as apposed to the innocent until proved guilty in a court of law approach. If one has lived through a period of limited civil liberties, I don't think one is so sanguine about giving that up.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

What this seems to show is that more people than not are not really very aware as to what it would be like where there to be a shift to a more systemic assumption of guilt when arrested as apposed to the innocent until proved guilty in a court of law approach. If one has lived through a period of limited civil liberties, I don't think one is so sanguine about giving that up.

i, for the record, voted "disagree with this."

if upon conviction, i'd not have an issue with it, but the presumption of innocence until proven guilty seems to have taken a hike. once the dna is collected, the federal government will always have it.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

i, for the record, voted "disagree with this."

if upon conviction, i'd not have an issue with it, but the presumption of innocence until proven guilty seems to have taken a hike. once the dna is collected, the federal government will always have it.

They currently need only a suspicion to acquire yours today, if they haven't already in the course of your dealings with the medical profession, in and out of Federal service. Any sense of privacy you still cling to should have gone away over the last decade, or haven't you noticed? For a small fee, there are a dozen or so internet sites that will give me every piece of information the collective private and public agencies have recorded about you in nanoseconds. Welcome to a brave new world!

Edited by ##########
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
the presumption of innocence until proven guilty seems to have taken a hike. once the dna is collected, the federal government will always have it.
Si, man (sigh, man).

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Benin
Timeline

We currently are fingerprinted and our fingerprints are put in a federal database in many cases if we are not even suspected of a crime. I had to be fingerprinted to work as a teacher. My husband was recently fingerprinted to process his AOS.

I voted I disagree, but I don't see an illogical leap from fingerprinting to DNA extraction.

AOS Timeline

4/14/10 - Packet received at Chicago Lockbox at 9:22 AM (Day 1)

4/24/10 - Received hardcopy NOAs (Day 10)

5/14/10 - Biometrics taken. (Day 31)

5/29/10 - Interview letter received 6/30 at 10:30 (Day 46)

6/30/10 - Interview: 10:30 (Day 77) APPROVED!!!

6/30/10 - EAD received in the mail

7/19/10 - GC in hand! (Day 96) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...