namregetras's US Immigration Timeline
|
Petitioner's Name: ILDUCE GAIL
Beneficiary's Name: GERMAN
VJ Member: namregetras
Country: Philippines
Last Updated: 2014-02-07
|
|
|
Immigration Checklist for ILDUCE GAIL & GERMAN:
|
USCIS I-130 Petition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dept of State IR-5 Visa:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USCIS I-751 Petition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USCIS N-400 Petition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IR-5 Visa
|
| Event |
Date |
| Service Center : |
California Service Center |
| Transferred? |
National Benefits Center on 2013-04-05 |
| Consulate : |
Manila, Philippines |
| Marriage (if applicable): |
|
| I-130 Sent : |
2013-02-12 |
| I-130 NOA1 : |
2013-02-14 |
| I-130 RFE : |
N/A |
| I-130 RFE Sent : |
N/A |
| I-130 Approved : |
2013-04-05 |
| NVC Received : |
2013-06-05 |
| Received DS-261 / AOS Bill : |
2013-06-20 |
| Pay AOS Bill : |
2013-06-22 |
| Receive I-864 Package : |
2013-06-23 |
| Send AOS Package : |
2013-06-24 |
| Submit DS-261 : |
2013-06-25 |
| Receive IV Bill : |
2013-07-03 |
| Pay IV Bill : |
2013-07-03 |
| Send IV Package : |
|
| Receive Instruction and Interview appointment letter : |
2013-07-23 |
| Case Completed at NVC : |
2013-08-28 |
| NVC Left : |
2013-08-29 |
| Consulate Received : |
2013-09-03 |
| Packet 3 Received : |
2013-07-23 |
| Packet 3 Sent : |
2013-07-26 |
| Packet 4 Received : |
2013-08-27 |
| Interview Date : |
2013-12-05 |
| Interview Result : |
Administrative Review
|
Second Interview
(If Required): |
|
| Second Interview Result: |
|
| Visa Received : |
|
| US Entry : |
|
| Comments : |
CAUSES OF DELAY:
USCIS
1. TRANSFER OF APROVED PETITION FROM NBC (NATIONAL BENEFITS CENTER) TO SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE AFTER APPROVAL ON 4/5/2013--5/22/2013---57 DAYS (SUPPOSED TO BE 7 DAYS)
2. TRANSFER OF APPROVED PETITION FROM SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE TO NVC ON 5/22/2013-6/6/2013---15 DAYS (SUPPOSED TO BE 7 DAYS)
NVC
1. NVC SYSTEM ENTRY OF PETITION BY NVC AFTER RECEIPT FROM SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE ON 6/6//2013-7/20/2013---44 DAYS (SUPPOSED TO BE 7 DAYS)
2. VERIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS AFTER RECEIPT FROM 7/26/2013-8/23/2013---28 DAYS (SUPPOSED TO BE 7 DAYS)
ST LUKES MEDICAL CLINIC
3. MEDICAL EXAM 9/12/2013 RELEASED ON 11/26/2013 ST. LUKES REQUIRED A SPUTUM CULTURE EXAMINATION WHICH WILL LAST FOR AT LEAST 2 MONTHS DELAY FOR EMBASSY INTERVIEW.---74 DAYS (SUPPOSED TO BE 2 DAYS)
MEDICAL DELAY 2 MONTHS SEPTEMBER 12 TO NOVEMBER 26 CAUSING THE EMBASSY INTERVIEW DATE TO BE MOVED FROM 10/01/2013 TO 12/05/2013.
12/5/2013 -- interview date -- request documentation
12/23/2013 -- requested documents submitted via 2go
01/03/2014 -- requested documents received by us embassy
|
Processing
Estimates/Stats : |
Your I-130 was approved in 50 days from your NOA1 date.
Your interview took 294 days from your I-130 NOA1 date. |
|
Member Reviews:
Consulate Review: Manila, Philippines
Review Topic: IR-5 Visa
|
| Event |
Description |
| Review Date : |
January 13, 2014 |
| Embassy Review : |
I have my interview on 12/5/2013.
1st call - finger print scanning and oath taking
2nd call - screening - I was instructed by the filipina to sign the ds-230 part
II. She asked me the following question; "What is your current civil status?" "I answered that I am divorced", "Have you travel outside the philippines?" "I answered I travelled a lot and I visited the whole continent of Europe", she asked me "what countries in Europe I visited", I started enumerating the countries I have visited and after i have mentioned 7 countries she said "ok" She told me that i was missing some documents, ie (nbi clearance, marriage certificate, old passports). I told her that i already submitted the original nbi clearance to nvc and i dont need to submit my marriage clearance as I am divorced and submitted my certified divorce judgement and original nso certificate of non marriage to nvc, but she insisted for those documents, I showed her my packet 4 (interview letter)from nvc that says that they already received the original nbi clearance and the certified divorce judgement, however, i have with me another original nbi clerance and my original 2 old passports, which she took, but I saw her making a notation that I need to submit my marriage certificate. She also took my current passport.
3rd call - I was interviewed by a female american consul and she told me that since I answered yes on line 41 of my ds-230 part II, i need to submit certified court records, I told her that I already submitted the certification from the court to nvc. She said she need the certified case docket. I sensed that she started to get irritated by my answer, so i just keep quiet.
4th call - I was instructed by a female filipina to check my e-mail as my application for a visa was refused per 221(g)pending submission of documents requested and was handed down a letter to be given to the 2go courier so i will not pay the documents delivery fee.
When I got home, I checked my e-mail and there it said that my visa application is being refused per 221(g) pending submission of requested documents. I called my sister right away in US to request my Marriage Certificate to Clark County, City of Las Vegas, NV and request Certificate of Court Record from the city and county of San Francisco, CA and Certificate of Case Docket from county of San Mateo, CA. I received the documents via fed-ex on 12/23/13, i went to 2go courier the same day to send it to the US embassy Manila. I check the 2go website to track my documents, per their record, it was pick up by 2go on 12/24/13 and my documents was delivered and received on 12/27/13by VFS a third party authorized by the US embassy, Manila to handle documents submission. I checked the CEAC website to track the status of my visa application and here below are the information given;
1/3/2014 - status updated - administrative processing
1/8/2014 - status updated - administrative processing
1/13/2014 -status updated - administrative processing
(updated on January 13, 2014) |
| Rating : |
Poor |
|
Timeline Comments: None yet, be the first!
*Notice about estimates: The estimates are based off averages of other members recent experiences
(documented in their timelines) for the same benefit/petition/application at the same filing location.
Individual results may vary as every case is not always 'average'. Past performance does not necessarily
predict future results. The 'as early as date' may change over time based on current reported processing
times from members. There have historically been cases where a benefit/petition/application processing
briefly slows down or stops and this can not be predicted. Use these dates as reference only and do not
rely on them for planning. As always you should check the
USCIS processing times to see if your application
is past due.
** Not all cases are transfered
ver 5.0
