K1 Fiance Visa Timelines

Pages: First 5222 5223 5224 5225 5226 Last (Showing page 5224, records 52231 - 52240 out of 66661 )

Notes: Some columns are currently hidden. [Filters: Service Center = All, Country = All] [SORT : Date Packet 3 received - ASC]

· enable advanced mode

Names	Country	Service Center	Xfer?	Consulate	I-129F Sent	I-129F NOA1	I-129F RFE(s) Received	I-129F RFE(s) Sent	I-129F NOA2	NVC Received	NVC Left	Consulate Received	Packet 3 Received	Packet 3 Sent	Packet 4 Received	Interview	Visa Received	US Entry	Marriage	Total Days File ➙ Int.	I-129F Mail to 1st NOA	I-129F NOA1 to NOA2	I-129F NOA2 to Interview	Comments. List anything unique to your case.	Updated Last
Naruemol & Richard	Thailand	Vermont	No	Bangkok, Thailand	2010-03-22	2010-03-26	2010-06-07	2010-06-16	2010-07-07	2010-07-17		2010-07-20	2010-07-22	2010-08-29	2010-09-23	2010-10-28	2010-11-08	2010-11-14	2011-01-05	220*	4	103	113	Interview was short just a few questions. Where and how we met? When did she plan to travel? Complimented Mol on her engagement ring. And that was it.	2012-07-10
Sarah & Clifford	Nigeria	Vermont	No	Nigeria	2010-05-11	2010-05-28			2010-06-17	2010-06-22	2010-06-26	2010-06-29	2010-07-23	2010-07-30		2010-11-12	2010-12-08	2011-04-06	2011-04-15	185*	17	20	148	- Received Email from the Lagos Embassy with a link to download package 3. - Delayed almost 1 month before visa was received - With no rhyme or reason for delay. After 4 total consulate visits (1 interview, 1 finger print redo, 2 inquiry)	2013-05-03
P & W	Ireland	Vermont	No	Dublin, Ireland	2010-04-20	2010-04-28	2010-06-15	2010-06-25	2010-07-06	2010-07-09	2010-07-12	2010-07-15	2010-07-23	2010-07-26	2010-07-28	2010-08-05	2010-08-10	2010-09-04	2010-09-07	107*	8	69	30		2017-04-27
Gabriela & Jason	Argentina	California	No	Argentina	2010-06-08	2010-06-29			2010-07-14			2010-07-20	2010-07-23					2011-05-28	2011-08-12	N/A	21	15	N/A		2012-03-13
David & Kelly	United Kingdom	California	No	London, United Kingdom	2010-04-04	2010-04-09			2010-06-16	2010-06-24	2010-07-01	2010-07-05	2010-07-23	2010-07-28	2010-08-20	2010-09-23	2010-11-01	2010-12-28	2011-02-28	172*	5	68	99	The NVC Receive and Consulate Receive dates are guesses because David's Packet 3 got lost in the mail. The Packet 3 Receive date is the date that he called the Consulate and they told him he should have received something by then...	2011-04-11
Sunny & Jim	China	California	No	Guangzhou, China	2010-05-01	2010-05-07			2010-07-12	2010-07-13	2010-07-15	2010-07-21	2010-07-24	2010-07-27	2010-08-08	2010-09-14				136	6	66	64		2010-08-11
Sarah & Jeremy	Philippines	California	No	Manila, Philippines	2010-04-07	2010-04-12			2010-06-21	2010-06-21	2010-06-29	2010-07-06	2010-07-24		2010-06-29	2010-08-18	2010-08-26	2010-10-14	2010-11-05	133*	5	70	58		2011-02-10
N & S	United Kingdom	Vermont	No	London, United Kingdom	2010-04-21	2010-04-27			2010-07-02	2010-07-08	2010-07-12	2010-07-15	2010-07-24	2010-09-20	2010-10-15	2010-11-03	2010-11-10	2010-12-07	2010-12-10	196*	6	66	124		2014-05-22
MM & PM	China	Vermont	No	Guangzhou, China	2010-05-18	2010-05-26			2010-06-28	2010-06-30	2010-07-19	2010-07-19	2010-07-24	2010-07-25	2010-08-12	2010-09-16	2010-09-22			121*	8	33	80		2010-09-23
Damion & Melissa	Jamaica	Vermont	No	Jamaica	2010-05-14	2010-05-17			2010-06-25	2010-06-29	2010-07-20	2010-07-21	2010-07-25		2010-08-09	2010-09-28	2010-10-21	2010-12-07	2010-12-20	137*	3	39	95	Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bona-fide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.	2011-06-04