Yet again, the media is parsing what was actually said, to alter the apparent meaning to meet the agenda that needs to be advanced.
What DJT actually wrote, “[Milley] was actually dealing with China to give them a heads up on the thinking of the President of the United States,” he posted. “This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH!” Alters the meaning entirely.
Rather than saying General Milley should be executed, he said that in the past, such actions would have been punished by death. As the senior officer in the US Military, passing sensitive information to an adversary would be regarded as treason, the punishment for which, especially in time of war, would be death.
so, nothing he wrote was untrue, neither was it a threat. Merely historical perspective.
Jack Smith is reaching again. Apparently, censorship is his specialty.