Boiler

Some Consulate make a fuss of this, London does not. I would use her US Address, that of her Parents on all documentation. Presumably as the time for your appointment comes you will have more evidence relating to the move, job applications, you said you are looking to buy a house so Realtor stuff etc. The bigger issue is meeting the I 864 requirements, simple solution is likely to use a Parent as a Joint Sponsor.

You can work if you wish, what is the feasibility issue?

Buck is retiring and she is switching to the 4th, basically everything east of the Front Range.

I would start by reading the link.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/while-abroad/birth-abroad.html

CRBA may be the term you are looking for.

Will you be interviewing in Canada.

Corporate Taxes should be disccused with an Accountant.

That knocks out two of the three options.

I am speaking generally, I am not sure I have seen Cuban cases, I would assume with the CCA it is very difficult to get an approval.

ROFL, I just commented on a post by someone from the UK who intends to rent out his property when he moves. Anyway for arguments sake how they are supposed to check the validity of any documents you take in the couple of minutes a B interview takes?

If you ell it to another entity would there be capital gains issues https://www.gov.uk/tax-sell-property/work-out-your-gain And of course: The property tax rate for Stamp Duty Land Tax in England and Northern Ireland is between two and twelve percent for a residential property valued at £255,00 and over £1.5 million.

They interview people not documents, the information needed is asked on the DS 160 which I am pretty sure includes employment.

They specifically say not buy tickets etc

You petion everyone You parents petition your siblings once they get here. Presumably the sister is not married

Long time since I filled in a DS160 but I do not recollect any subjective questions they were all factual Think of it like going to the DMV it is a data collection form.

The norm is 2 or 3 questions, so not something I would get upset about, my impression is that those questions in refusal cases are just being polite. Often people are asked what can be read on the DS160 I think it is unreasonable to make people who they are going to deny to attend an interview but as I understand it the Consulate have no choice in the matter.

My understanding is that for OCare you have to be resident in the US, I do not know if you can fudge it but I do not see how your Spouse can, she has to be a LPR to qualify. And that gets her a SSN. I know there are new immigrant policies, you can find them with a quick google, not that expensive but then they do not cover much. Probably temp insurance underwritten by the big players as well but outside my knowledge. For specific questions about salary etc I would call a Navigator. I think this is when you end up going around in circles with where you are resident.

1. Yes 2. Confused you said he went to the interview, he must have to be rejected. 3. If he wants to go to Disney, yes. Seems odd for someone of his age to be so Disney focussed, there is one in Paris btw. 4. Unless he personally knows the State Representative then something you get from an Intern is at best irrelevant. Immigration law is Federal and not sure where thios comes in. 5. Well my opinion is no, if they issue a visa they have no control over who he travels with.

There may be a problem with you having a US Spouse, or you may sail straight through. Having filed a Consulate case you at least say that you have long term desire to become a resident but are doing it the proper way.

This seems secondary, with the long wait times thee is a lot to be said for getting it started sooner than later, it seems in this case they have a couple of years , the real downside of starting like now is that they may waste some of the 3 years waiting for the Daughter's case to process.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/19/trump-colorado-presidential-ballot-disqualified-14th-amendment In a historic decision, the justices ordered that he be removed from the state’s presidential primary ballot, after determining that he engaged in insurrection on 6 January 2021. The ruling sets up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to settle whether the January 6 attack on the Capitol amounted to an insurrection, and whether Trump’s involvement disqualifies him from running for office. The 4-3 decision by the Colorado supreme court marks the first time a presidential candidate has been deemed unqualified for office under a rarely used provision that bars insurrectionists from holding office. “A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, wrote in its ruling. Trump has vowed to appeal to the US supreme court, his campaign said. “We have full confidence that the US supreme court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these un-American lawsuits,” said Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesperson. These are the same people who keep on going on about defending Democracy. You must admit it is hilarious. Amusingly using such a broad brush interpretation I can see Old Joe having the same issues. Where does it stop? All the Dem states ban Trump and all the Repub States ban Old Joe?

https://www.britishcornershop.co.uk/?i=336546 It is that time of year and I have been here long enough to let most things go, obviously not HP sauce and the odd jar of Branston, but somehow I am more inclined to stock up now, Christmas Pudding, Mince Pies etc, and some decent chocolate of course. Now the prices make me wince, probably because I am remembering prices from years ago. So the link is above to the one I use, is there anything other people feel the need to special order?

https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-announces-family-reunification-parole-process-for-ecuador Certain nationals of Ecuador who are beneficiaries of an approved Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative may be eligible to be considered for parole under the new process. Qualifying beneficiaries must be outside the United States, meet all requirements, including screening and vetting and medical requirements, and must not have already received an immigrant visa.

I just noticed and I have to work! Just wondered what other people indigenous persons are doing to celebrate.