Boiler

CNN covered this yesterday, now obviously they had an outraged lady commentator. I have also noticed that the advertising on CNN has a certain pattern that maybe related to their audience. So I have it on now and am going to jot down the ones that seem to be relevant. Tremfya. not sure what that is for but sounds nasty. ro, larger ladies sticking a needle in themselves to lose weight vuori, now they use that hot college student but I often see ladies who perhaps should go with something looser. Many are asking a lot of high performance fabrics. Generac ladies concerned about losing power Guaranteed life insurance - that seems more for the older ladies about to be widowed St Jude, not sure about them but they must spend a fortune on adverts. uno see ro And various creams whose adverts I can not watch Now they are going on about moderate drinking....

It was 2 days ago and I think around 40 minutes Just watched yesterday and another good one early in the show, guy got naturalised divorced wife married second wife and sponsoring her but still living with first wife.

Why are you going the K1 route? If she has a Visitor Visa she can visit, we have a mega Thread on the subject. You need to show you met her not her Mother.

What is your PD?

Why does he think he is eligible to go the DCF route? Probably a good idea for him to join as it does not seem he has shared his plans with you.

Why does he think he is eligible to go the DCF route?

Sounds more like your Husband wants toi file DCF. Do you know on what basis?

Heinz Tomato Ketchup was advertised: "Blessed relief for Mother and the other women in the household!", a slogan which alluded to the lengthy process required to produce tomato ketchup in the home. Amazing how easy they have it now.

Mine was about an hour? And even then most of that time was hanging around.

That is not how it works. If she needs to visit the US for urgent medical treatment that look a the B2 Medical Visa.

Do you mean DCF Are you both living in Kenya?

Jim had a classic on 2 days ago, in this case this guy had been visited and was trying to prove the opposite, that he was not cohabitating with an ex wife whilst married to a USC. As he explained it they lived at opposite ends of the building. I envisaged some massive mansion with one of those very long dining tables, turned out to be a 2 bedroom apartment. Now this does sound more like that standard US Film from the 1950's arrangement.

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/driver-education-and-safety/special-interest-driver-guides/new-to-california/

If the +1 was for example a US Citizen there would be no issue and they would cover your expenses as defined. But you are not so the only option you have currently is to visit, I assume you can use the VWP which is up to 90 days, I would not push it that far, and that you will find out in April what sort of expenses they will reimburse, flights, living costs whatever. Maybe x flights a year and a per diem?

10 days

Permit Usually new residents can for a while which varies by State. Some are more generous than others.

Definitely check with the Consulate 2 weeks is tight

You were told what to do. But seem to have ignored that.

The way I read it is that he does not have a Visa.

IAnd if you are short of money the last thing you want to do is delay EAD.

You mention no basis for him to be admitted to the US, presumably he has the Mothers permission to travel to leave the US.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/19/trump-colorado-presidential-ballot-disqualified-14th-amendment In a historic decision, the justices ordered that he be removed from the state’s presidential primary ballot, after determining that he engaged in insurrection on 6 January 2021. The ruling sets up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to settle whether the January 6 attack on the Capitol amounted to an insurrection, and whether Trump’s involvement disqualifies him from running for office. The 4-3 decision by the Colorado supreme court marks the first time a presidential candidate has been deemed unqualified for office under a rarely used provision that bars insurrectionists from holding office. “A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, wrote in its ruling. Trump has vowed to appeal to the US supreme court, his campaign said. “We have full confidence that the US supreme court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these un-American lawsuits,” said Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesperson. These are the same people who keep on going on about defending Democracy. You must admit it is hilarious. Amusingly using such a broad brush interpretation I can see Old Joe having the same issues. Where does it stop? All the Dem states ban Trump and all the Repub States ban Old Joe?

https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-announces-family-reunification-parole-process-for-ecuador Certain nationals of Ecuador who are beneficiaries of an approved Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative may be eligible to be considered for parole under the new process. Qualifying beneficiaries must be outside the United States, meet all requirements, including screening and vetting and medical requirements, and must not have already received an immigrant visa.