Boiler

You start by filing an I 130, good idea to read the guides on here. 18 months ish No Presumably the legalities have been sorted with the other parent.

I have not come across anyone being told a reason, just a normal interview.

What is the reason?

My understanding is can be waived not will be waived.

Correct

One more for the I 864 and update the DS260 at the interview.

https://dch.georgia.gov/georgiapathways Might want to see if this works for you.

And a Joint Sponsor

I 94 can be obtained online

F11 is child of a USC

I know Turkey is heavily backlogged

My first thought is why

Iran?

Max they would take is 2 years so that is 2021, now 2024, what has happened?

You have asked for specific answers and provide no information. Generally I look at an EB5 as buying a Green Card any money you get back is a bonus. He must have applied sometime ago through a regional scheme with that amount. You do not even mention the scheme. You mention you have a Lawyer who presumably have perused the terms of the agreement, there are exit clauses and I would think it very unlikely your Uncle would have invested without both legal and financial advice so I would start by contacting those advisers.

The only way I can make sense of this is that your father was a LPR and has now naturalised? CSPA applies but to what extent I can not say.

Is he the sponsor? If so get him to file.

I 864

Redo taxes?

So the issue is the level of deductions you have taken in the past?

I am not sure scace is the right word. Strikes me that a lot of soon to be past use by date has gone over and looking at it from a very realpolitik perspective it is a very cheap way of degrading the Russian military, a lot of money but small beer is US military spending terms.

I have not heard of expedited biometrics bit they do not seem to take that long. Being realistic I suppose relative to how long he has to go they will be back and firmly established in the US long before he is interviewed.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/19/trump-colorado-presidential-ballot-disqualified-14th-amendment In a historic decision, the justices ordered that he be removed from the state’s presidential primary ballot, after determining that he engaged in insurrection on 6 January 2021. The ruling sets up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to settle whether the January 6 attack on the Capitol amounted to an insurrection, and whether Trump’s involvement disqualifies him from running for office. The 4-3 decision by the Colorado supreme court marks the first time a presidential candidate has been deemed unqualified for office under a rarely used provision that bars insurrectionists from holding office. “A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, wrote in its ruling. Trump has vowed to appeal to the US supreme court, his campaign said. “We have full confidence that the US supreme court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these un-American lawsuits,” said Steven Cheung, a Trump campaign spokesperson. These are the same people who keep on going on about defending Democracy. You must admit it is hilarious. Amusingly using such a broad brush interpretation I can see Old Joe having the same issues. Where does it stop? All the Dem states ban Trump and all the Repub States ban Old Joe?

https://www.britishcornershop.co.uk/?i=336546 It is that time of year and I have been here long enough to let most things go, obviously not HP sauce and the odd jar of Branston, but somehow I am more inclined to stock up now, Christmas Pudding, Mince Pies etc, and some decent chocolate of course. Now the prices make me wince, probably because I am remembering prices from years ago. So the link is above to the one I use, is there anything other people feel the need to special order?

https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/news-releases/dhs-announces-family-reunification-parole-process-for-ecuador Certain nationals of Ecuador who are beneficiaries of an approved Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative may be eligible to be considered for parole under the new process. Qualifying beneficiaries must be outside the United States, meet all requirements, including screening and vetting and medical requirements, and must not have already received an immigrant visa.