Boiler

At least he is in very good company.

I used to see these all the time, the trouble of course is proving it was you.

There are plenty of historic precedents, none ended well.

Certainly is an unusual one.

I thought this was interesting, the EU has many issues of course and this is not the one thing I thought would bring it down. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/22/migration-eu-diplomat-josep-borrell-ukraine-china Migration could be “a dissolving force for the European Union” due to deep cultural differences between European countries and their long-term inability to reach a common policy, the EU’s most senior diplomat has said. Although Russia will try to fan the flames on migration inside Europe, Josep Borrell denied that the conflict in Ukraine was contributing to the crisis, which he described as a decades-old problem fuelled by wars and poverty in departure countries. This I certainly will agree with: In a wide-ranging interview with the Guardian reflecting on how the EU had been changed by the war and where the bloc fits in this new world order, he said European countries had been forced to wake from a siesta on defence spending, in which they had lived under the American nuclear umbrella. And this: At a subsequent lecture at the New York University Law School, he said the UN security council had been proved “completely useless in recent years due to its divisions” and called for an overhaul of political and financial institutions to revive a multilateralism that “is outdated and running out of steam”.

I am not saying that is impossible but does not tie in with this. They would have submitted the fraudulent I 94.

I 601a and a very different process. Hopefully we will get some clarification.

Interesting I thought this sort of thing was just a perk of the job. This sets a worrying precedent.

Normally because there is something they do not like about it.

The more I think about it 245i seems very unlikely so we are guessing. For the life of me I can not think how she could adjust, assume there is something obvious not mentioned. That still leaves the concurrent I 601, new one for me, how does the Lawyer know what needs to be waived to start with, who is filing the waiver?

OP said there is a Lawyer involved and 245i was all I could think of. I had a look at past posts but there are no clues.

How is she able to adjust without authorised entry?

https://www.ustraveldocs.com/pk/pk-niv-visaapply.asp Here you are Good Luck

I am trying to think of what scenario this could apply. I 485 well she must be in the US otherwise she can not adjust. I 601 for what? If she does not have legal entry how is she adjusting, 245i? now I am not that familiar with that but did not think it involved a I 601. Perhaps there is something obvious I am not thinking of.

As long as you do not use EAD and AP you will retain your F1 status

She has to wait for her PD to be current, I am not sure when that will be.

Nope

It does not seem to make any difference having said that you do not have a strong case but free to try.

Your Mother has been issued an immigrant visa?

It could

Just get someone else to file.

L is used by Foreign Companies to set up US operations. Everybody has to start somewhere.

I have family members who were offered a move to the US on a L, so definitely a thing, I have also met people who came over to the US originally on a L and were then sponsored in an EB category.

15,000 for the lottery, 15,000 for those waiting longest, 30,000 in total. The I 134A is vague, you can show income or assets, best to go by the I 864.

The only way it would be less than 2 years if she came up in the lottery element, 15,000 a month.