Boiler

Interview for what?

We are on page 162 of a thread where posters say otherwise.

I do not see how you could have filed for him and his PD is current

Mine covered the totality of my existence.

Probably not

Look at it the other way around, imagine the outcry if PD progressed and the Consulate could choose not to acknowledge it

Is your PD current?

That is true but a separate issue. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2023/visa-bulletin-for-april-2023.html

No

Agree but we are where we are. She should have held out for the GC and for him to adopt her children

Just going back to the last post, there are lots of VAWA self help groups and mention of her spending a lot of time on her phone. From the OPs perspective her going home would be the best option. I just do not see a win win.

She is not authorized to work

We would need to know when this would be filed and what the VB says then

Sort of assume OP is adjusting from a B. Not a LPR.

The visa bulletin has retrogressed.

I might check the other Consulates

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2023/visa-bulletin-for-april-2023.html A. FINAL ACTION DATES FOR FAMILY-SPONSORED PREFERENCE CASES On the chart below, the listing of a date for any class indicates that the class is oversubscribed (see paragraph 1); "C" means current, i.e., numbers are authorized for issuance to all qualified applicants; and "U" means unauthorized, i.e., numbers are not authorized for issuance. (NOTE: Numbers are authorized for issuance only for applicants whose priority date is earlier than the final action date listed below.) Family- Sponsored All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed CHINA-mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIPPINES F1 01DEC14 01DEC14 01DEC14 01APR01 01MAR12 F2A 08SEP20 08SEP20 08SEP20 01NOV18 08SEP20 F2B 22SEP15 22SEP15 22SEP15 01JUN01 22OCT11 F3 22NOV08 22NOV08 22NOV08 01NOV97 08JUN02 F4 22MAR07 22MAR07 15SEP05 01AUG00 22AUG02 Some big changes, all the C's have gone.

We only know his side but it is not looking good.

It is difficult but the Law is the Law.

He has no say in her children, but unlikely a Court would allow her to take their child.

The children can be included in her VAWA application. Assuming she wants to stay.

https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2023/visa-bulletin-for-april-2023.html Seems to have just come out, well that is a major change, now I had seen people comment that it was coming. Obviously being just 19 or nearly 20 makes a difference, if you came on a K1 then you could have included children up to 21.

You need to find the very best Divorce Lawyer you can. NOW From an Immigration perspective absolutely pull the I 864.

They are very special