Jump to content

Boiler

Members
  • Posts

    76,073
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    300

Everything posted by Boiler

  1. I remember one where the Consulate had missed an inadmissibility and they needed a waiver, not quite sure how they picked it up.
  2. It's up to the Consulate as to whether they will interview visitors or not, all you can do is ask.
  3. I would not hang around, quick legal marriage and file, if they want the party thing take their time and do it later.
  4. Contact the person who said it was OK and that you want to file with the Consulate, the original I 130 is no good as you were not legally married when you filed it.
  5. I travelled twice on AP, both to Mexico and both on holiday.
  6. I would do U4U anyway even without the AWA issues. The intent then would be to marry and adjust, now for that you need a Lawyer, there was a lady who posted here on Thursday who is I think in a worse situation that you, but married and what do they do if there is no route?
  7. Not sure how to say this without being rude and I do not mean to be ride but you need to focus on the actual issues, 90% of what you have posted is essentially filler. To do anything you need to marry, I have seen similar cases where a marriage has been premature and there has been no issue with fraud. I would marry and see if the Consulate will allow you to file direct as that is much quicker, if not file with the lockbox and seek an expedited, much longer.
  8. I appreciate how the MSM have covered it but lets think about it, is you were Putin who would you want to deal with, Kam by a country mile.
  9. Canada has issues with DUIs so that seems a no goer. Australia well there is a sort of free movement with NZ so that might be doable but I do not know. Calling it AWA may not be right but not sure it matters, for example a false claim to US Citizenship is not AWA but a non waiverable ban, and I think we are in the same sort of ball park.
  10. She can visit during the process, presumably she is eligible for the VWP. Usual rules apply, do not make it too frequent or too long.
  11. It would not effect U4U, K1 absolutely.
  12. They are totally different, I assume you will be the sponsor for the U4U I 134A which is any event meaningless and has minimal requirements. K1 means you want to marry and have the intent to adjust.
  13. I do know what you are referring to but that is a long time ago. I keep it in the glove box so out of the sun.
  14. I was zapped by the sun, outside for 2 days last week and no hat... Now I have sunscreen, 3 bottles, one in the car, but forget to use it.
  15. I 601a is not a given, no waiver is, but a waiver for an adult child is more challenging than say a waiver for a spouse. Also wonder what he is doing, chilling for 10 years? He may also need a I 601 at the Consulate interview.
  16. OK well this is what I would expect a Lawyer versed in these sort of cases to say Will need to see the full charge and any supporting documents Will need to appoint a NZ Criminal Lawyer to advise on the case Will want to find out if it is possible to reopen the case and change the charge to something US Immigration friendly, no idea if this is possible or would eventually work. But do not see an alternative. So a complicated case, a long case, an expensive case with I would think with a low chance of success.
  17. Serious stuff i need to check and am on my phone so will do later, not going to make an off the cuff comment
×
×
  • Create New...