Tahoma

On 11/3/2017 at 10:38 AM, jayjayj said:

Try to write posts that are clear and there won't be a problem.

My post was clear to anyone who didn't attend Trump University.

We know how desperate the kook-right is to deflect attention away from their beloved Moron-in-Chief by how many times they scream "HILLARY."

But it won't stop the Mueller steamroller!

11 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

Almost as good as all those THOUSANDS of shovel-ready jobs that got $50 billion thrown at them.  Then didn’t happen.  Remember that?

Nice try!  Republicans used the exact same rhetoric about the stimulus package.  Perhaps you believe that Monday's appropriations for infrastructure projects will result in construction beginning on Tuesday.   The stimulus package resulted in 10,000+ infrastructure projects that put people to work at good-paying jobs.

I see no movement at all by Trump to put coal miners back to work.  Maybe he'll have them make buggy whips instead.

Trump: "I have a great memory!!!  I remember that I promised many times that I would put the coal miners to work.  Both of them!!!"

20 minutes ago, jayjayj said:

Hilary wasn't an insider?  She completely railroaded Bernie.  She rigged the primary.  That is exactly what you said, an insider.  You said the story about an insider screwing over Bernie has been debunked.  

Ahhh, no, that's not what I said.  Not even close.  Sheesh..

8 minutes ago, bcking said:

Your link doesn't comment on the DNC hack being done by a Bernie supporter.

 

The person you quoted said that the theory that the hack was an inside job was debunked. If you want to suggest otherwise, you need to provide a different source. That article just talks about an agreement between Hillary and the DNC with regards to fundraising and control of their funds.

There are certainly some serious reading comprehension issues in this thread, aren't there?  

20 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

You didn’t say guns were regulated, I did.  So we were not in agreement.  I pointed out that guns are already regulated.

OK, I'll make it even simpler.  Just like vehicles, guns should be subject to further regulation.  Bump stocks are a good example of this.  Unfortunately, there is a vocal minority of Americans, including some in this forum, who won't give an inch on this issue. Do you think bump stocks should be banned?

24 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

I hope Manafort squeals like a pig.

He's already facing 15 years, and the indictment can be amended to add additional charges.  

19 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

Never said they would.  Just pointing out the fallacy of your comment.

Where's the fallacy? You agree that both vehicles and guns are regulated, so what problem do you have with banning bump stocks?

5 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

That’s just it... guns AREN’T any different.  They have many regulations as well.  And just like vehicles, the law abiding owners of each follow the rules.

Just like you, law abiding gun owners will have no problem living without bump stocks.

Trump logic: Blame the diversity lottery when a person becomes radicalized in the U.S.

6 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Yeah it's funny how when someone kills people with a truck the person driving the truck is at fault. When someone uses a gun it's the guns fault. You don't see truck manufacturers being sued or proposals to ban trucks but when it's guns were talking about its a whole different story.

There are many regulations on vehicles which are for public safety.  Why  should guns be any different?  If bump stocks were banned, I'll bet you wouldn't even miss them.

3 hours ago, CaliCat said:

It's a mystery to me how some people excuse Trump's Neanderthal behavior.  Being an incompetent president is one thing, but being a miserable human being is much worse.

2 hours ago, IDWAF said:

Democratic daily logic:

A truck was used to kill people.  We need MORE GUN CONTROL!!

Amnesia issue here.  

It's going to be interesting to see Trump tweet about his own trial.

We'll have to file this story somewhere else because Trump's snake-oil file is full.

13 hours ago, CaliCat said:

 

 

Does that surprise you? He's filling the swamp with his own bottom feeders. LOL

Clovis is a radio talk show host, and Trump wanted him to be the chief scientist at the FDA.  Nothing Trump does surprises me anymore.

19 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I think they are starting the Uranium One investigation.

That they are, and guess who is doing it?  It's Trump's stooge, Devin Nunes, the same guy who made a fool of himself a few months ago and had to recuse himself from the Trump/Russia collusion investigation.

Of course, the investigation is simply another attempt by Nunes to shift attention away from the Trump investigation.  It won't go anywhere because it was debunked long ago.  Ask yourself, why is Nunes investigating it only now.  Hmmm...

The child-size handcuffs fit perfectly!  😀

Another one of Trump's poor choices.

Clovis had better take his attorney to the confirmation hearing.  

10 hours ago, jayjayj said:

That is delusional.

Just wishful thinking.  I'll settle for an impeachment.

6 hours ago, eieio said:

I thought it was called opposition research??  or was that just what it was called last week?

Robert Meuller calls it conspiracy to subvert the U.S. presidential elections.  He also calls it a felony.

Just another brick in Mueller's wall of mounting evidence. 

Let the perp walks begin!