Jump to content

S2N

Members
  • Posts

    535
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

S2N last won the day on October 1

S2N had the most liked content!

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    IR-1/CR-1 Visa
  • Country
    Chile

Immigration Timeline & Photos

S2N's Achievements

Recent Profile Visitors

2,375 profile views
  1. Congratulations and Merry Christmas! Seems like a good plan. We had our entire submission drafted and ready to go for the day the exit from the United States processed (he came here to marry in person, and we filed immediately when he left.) Honestly made it so much easier. Process took all of 30 minutes since everything was already drafted. You also have times to ask questions here to get it right when you do submit.
  2. To say it a bit more bluntly: retirees marrying people of a similar age abroad are more likely to need joint sponsors now, which honestly doesn’t change much as they were already more likely to need joint sponsors. Going back to OP, though, a spouse/sponsor working an airline job is very likely to pass the public charge test even when considering health issues. This whole thread is honestly very confusing for both immigration and non-immigration reasons. OP should just continue on with their petition like normal. They’re likely to have a visa in hand within a few months if they do nothing. The more they do around this particular topic, the more red flags there are.
  3. Like most things with this administration it’s likely to be targeted in implementation would be my guess. Argentina you’re likely safe if you have diabetes. Bolivia not so much. It’s also worth pointing out the elephant in the room here: for the overwhelming majority of people living in the US sponsoring a foreign spouse this won’t be an issue. The costs associated with maintaining a cross-border relationship are considerable, and to get to the point where you have enough evidence of bona fides, you’re going to have spent substantial money to the level that your income should qualify regardless of health conditions. We see a lot of the edge cases here, but just by its nature an international relationship tends to weed out people without sufficient funds. This will have more of an impact on people living abroad with spouses, retirees, and college kids applying for AOS than anyone else. Sponsor working a job in the US that can sustain an international relationship likely doesn’t have much to worry about.
  4. Yes, that’s now explicitly part of the new guidelines, actually. We haven’t seen how this plays out in practice and I have a suspicion it will focus on countries the administration deems less desirable but not ban-worthy, but that is now part of the guidance.
  5. The most recent executive action tightened the family-based exemption. I haven’t had time to read through it to see full impact, but the slip sheet the White House put out on it called out tightening restrictions there since family-based visas can be fraud prone.
  6. I know in the Latin American context I have Venezuelan friends with passports from other countries that have no problem entering on those passports. Thats a CBP question over a USCIS question, but ideally DHS would be aligned internally on that. Who knows though.
  7. Typically most favored passport is recognized.
  8. 1) I would strongly suggest not updating the foreign passport to the new name. You can, but the general consensus here is that legal name changes are a hassle until naturalization. It’d be easiest for her to get her ITIN in her maiden name. 2) The answer is no if you go by the letter of what the IRS wants, but except for extremely specific circumstances it single vs. married filing separately doesn’t have a material impact on taxes so this is largely unenforced. Which is to say many people file single. 3) No one here can give you tax advice. As we’re not in a professional relationship with you and/or aren’t licensed to do so. Married filing jointly is almost guaranteed to be better financially and for a high fraud country like Nigeria would also likely be positive evidence to present. You should consult a CPA with experience in the complicated matter of multi-jurisdiction taxes, foreign tax credit, and non-resident spouses. There’s likely a bunch in major cities near the Canadian border if you’re unsure where to start looking.
  9. When did you submit? They definitely have the I-130 if you have a receipt number. No harm uploading the passport again as unsolicited evidence. Won’t slow anything down and might give you more peace of mind.
  10. I signed as interpreter (not as preparer; I wasn’t paid.) Asks the beneficiary to certify they can understand English and my husband can’t. We didn’t see any downside to it, but I suspect @OldUser is correct you could likely leave it out. We did it because it was fairly clear from our overall package that he doesn’t speak English.
  11. Worth noting that given the current political situation, it might not be a good idea to have minimal evidence for a red flag marriage in a high fraud risk country. You can still apply, but “marriage certificate and pictures” is less than what many of us on our first marriages from low fraud countries submit.
  12. Heh, sorry. Thought it was common knowledge. My bad. Because of the extensive information sharing between US/UK/AUS/NZ/CAN, most times the government has to vet foreign nationals from one of the other four, things go more smoothly. If a citizen of one of those countries was a threat, they’d be in one of the databases already.
  13. NVC/London IV unit are unlikely to be an issue. USCIS could be, but the fact this is the UK means even if they’re confused it’d likely be easy to overcome. Citizens of five-eyes countries aren’t exactly subject to extreme amounts of scrutiny, even in the current climate.
  14. Also with the current timeline, she’s likely going to have a CR-1 in hand before a B-2 or an expedite at NVC or the embassy would occur.
  15. Argentina and Chile typically have equivalent dental and oral health standards and practices to the U.S. to the point where I’ve considered getting some work done down there. In the sense that the standards are pretty high. Your case might be very specific, but people familiar with the region are going to be skeptical that it’s really a need. B2 medical is the best bet here.
×
×
  • Create New...