@wazzujoel thank you for your reply and advise . Let me address the points so you can see why this is not nothing more than discrimination.
1. We filed i-130 online , I uploaded a copy of his birth certificate which came straight from the office of vital stastics as his original was burned in a fire years ago .
2. I supplied proof from the prison which shows he is a US citizen too
3. What is the definition of a marriage because "real marriages" where couple sleep in the same bed and all the things you mentioned still get divorced. We have been married for 8 years longer than most " normal marriages" last.
4. We supplied the following information.
a. 8 years of in person and video visits . I visit him every week
b. 12 years of phone call records supplied by the prison themselves.
c. 8 years of correspondence between myself and his attorneys.
d. 8 years of correspondence with various prison officials.
e. 8 years of putting money on his books and money he sends me to cover bills.
f. Arranged a call with prison officials that the USCIS officer could have called to speak directly to my husband. The officer didn't even look at the information regarding the phone call. He said he didn't think they would go interview him at the prison.
g. The actual marriage certificate.
h. Names of three people who have been in the same situation as me and were granted a green card including the name of one of their attorneys. I personally tracked these people down.
5. I had 2 banker boxes of documents including letters , evidence we had continued to collect. Our marriage certificate, both birth certificates, updated sponsors tax returns. My tax returns he never asked for a thing despite me offering all the documents to view. His words were "it's not necessary "
They took almost 3 years to adjuticate my case , the interview was originally waived in September 2022. I don't think they even bothered to look at anything not even their own policy that states the interview of incarcerated individuals can be waived on a case by case basis. They did not take anything into account.
@wazzujoel thank you for your reply and advise . Let me address the points so you can see why this is not nothing more than discrimination.
1. We filed i-130 online , I uploaded a copy of his birth certificate which came straight from the office of vital stastics as his original was burned in a fire years ago .
2. I supplied proof from the prison which shows he is a US citizen too
3. What is the definition of a marriage because "real marriages" where couple sleep in the same bed and all the things you mentioned still get divorced. We have been married for 8 years longer than most " normal marriages" last.
4. We supplied the following information.
a. 8 years of in person and video visits . I visit him every week
b. 12 years of phone call records supplied by the prison themselves.
c. 8 years of correspondence between myself and his attorneys.
d. 8 years of correspondence with various prison officials.
e. 8 years of putting money on his books and money he sends me to cover bills.
f. Arranged a call with prison officials that the USCIS officer could have called to speak directly to my husband. The officer didn't even look at the information regarding the phone call. He said he didn't think they would go interview him at the prison.
g. The actual marriage certificate.
h. Names of three people who have been in the same situation as me and were granted a green card including the name of one of their attorneys. I personally tracked these people down.
5. I had 2 banker boxes of documents including letters , evidence we had continued to collect. Our marriage certificate, both birth certificates, updated sponsors tax returns. My tax returns he never asked for a thing despite me offering all the documents to view. His words were "it's not necessary "
They took almost 3 years to adjuticate my case , the interview was originally waived in September 2022. I don't think they even bothered to look at anything not even their own policy that states the interview of incarcerated individuals can be waived on a case by case basis. They did not take anything into account.