Edward and Jaycel

My apologies.... I misread what appointment you have on Dec. 29th. You can reschedule a biometrics appointment pretty easily if you have your online access to your account in the my.uscis.gov portal. I thought it said interview appointment. Now the question becomes, do you want to spend $580 (Online Filing Fee) or $630 (Paper Filing Fee) to re-file your I-131 application. That's a cost/benefit decision for you but personally, unless you think it might be likely that you need to do an emergency trip back home, I wouldn't bother. I say this because while the I-485 is pending, I would not travel on AP for anything but an emergency.

Do not reschedule your appointment unless it's a dire emergency keeping you from attending.... Having to change your travel plans is a small price to pay to get this done. You misunderstood this instruction. They are referring to the new $1,000 fee they implemented for being actually paroled into the country. You still needed to pay the application fee for advance parole when you filed. This is why it was rejected. Maybe fortunate and saved yourself $630 since they scheduled your interview so quickly, hopefully you will have no need of it.

It's never left for me.... been broken since you first reported it.

Timing on responses to RFEs at USCIS is mostly officer / workload dependant. It can range from a few days to a few months unfortunately.

This is the correct option

They will take a photo and fingerprints at the interview regardless of the new policy.... I think this is more towards limiting the "Biometrics Reuse" when filing for a benefit. If you haven't had a picture taken by USCIS within 3 years then they will not reuse biometrics data they collected further back than that 3 years and it looks like they will schedule you for a new appointment regardless of the last biometrics taken when you submit one of the applications listed in the policy.

US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is issuing new guidance that limits the age of foreign nationals’ photos that can be used to create immigration documents to no more than three years. This update enhances national security and prevents identity fraud. Effective immediately, the new guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual limits the use of photos to those that were taken within three years of the date a person files a USCIS form. Additionally, self-submitted photos will no longer be accepted. Only photos taken by USCIS or other authorized entities will be used. This ensures every photo used in a secure document is recent, accurate, and reliable—key requirements to preventing fraud and identity theft. Robust screening and vetting processes are critical to protecting the security and integrity of the U.S. immigration system. COVID-19-era flexibilities, which allowed the reuse of photos for up to 10 years even if a person’s appearance changed significantly, were kept in place longer than necessary. This compromised USCIS’ ability to verify, identify, and properly screen aliens. This policy change aligns with Department of Homeland Security priorities to modernize screening and vetting processes and address the vulnerabilities in identity documents. Certain forms will require a new photo, regardless of when an applicant’s or petitioner’s last photograph was taken. These include Form I-90, Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card; Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status; Form N-400, Application for Naturalization; and Form N-600, Application for Certificate of Citizenship.

She did not ever have it... The good thing at SLEC now (from what I'm told) is that they do the Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) Test for TB also and don't rely solely on the X-Ray like they used to. He will have to disclose his history and that should explain if they see any old scarring on the X-Ray. The thing is with SLEC is that it seems hit or miss depending on who the radiologist is reading the X-Ray. This was the biggest thing we were nervous about in the whole embassy process.

@Captain Ewok in addition to the [[Block new_topics_2019 is throwing an error]] it looks like the "Trending Immigration Discussions" section is not populating new stories as well

There is nowhere on the I-130 where you have to disclose these things.... However, USCIS still does background checks on the petitioners and I have seen on other platforms, an increasing number of US Citizen Petitioners reporting that they are being scheduled for biometrics appointments. Most of them have reported that they have some kind of criminal record, so be prepared for this. Also get ahead of the train here and start requesting whatever official court records / expungement certificates, DVTRO dismissal records you can get your hands on. Get a few copies of each. That way you will be prepared in case of an RFE from USCIS (when they RFE for court records, they want official, sealed/stamped court records) AND you will have another set to send to your wife as they will likely want official records at the embassy interview. I would also start crafting a short, sworn affidavit that you can have notarized, explaining these things. Then when the time comes, you are prepared for any eventuality and not scrambling with an RFE clock ticking down or trying to answer a 221g from the embassy.

Woo Hooo!!! 🎉🎉🎉 Congratulations!!

Have you made a public inquiry with NVC to get your case number yet?

Yes... Our status changed to "Card Produced" 5 days after the approval and it arrived in the mail 3 days after that. Our friends got their approval Dec.2nd and their status changed to "Card Produced" on Dec. 5th so it can go faster and slower

Woo Hoo!!! Congrats! 🎉🎉 That was almost exactly as long after the interview as our friends who got approved last week

I'm getting the same error

Fingers crossed for you guys!!

Our friends just got their approval - 125 days post interview, 65 days post congressional inquiry

If this is in the "Case Progress" tab, you can ignore the estimates there. They are notoriously inaccurate. I will say that a lot of the times it changes dramatically like that, it's because someone at USCIS did something with your file and it trips that progress estimator to change wildly for some reason.

Read the language carefully (especially pertinent in government Policy Memoranda) it says, "Place a hold on pending benefit requests". A benefit request is not "pending" until it has been accepted and a receipt notice issued. By this language, if they follow the memorandum, they should accept and receipt the I-751 (which includes the automatic 48-month extension). The adjudication of the benefit is then placed on hold. If it's not cleared up by May, file the I-751 as your window opens.

File on-time... The pause, according to the policy memo, is a pause on adjudications. Theoretically this means that your application should be accepted and receipt notice with 48-month extension should be issued.

So happy for you guys!! Congrats and please stay around and contribute where you can

To be clear.... the OP was asking about whether the petitioner receiving benefits ever in their lifetime would affect the AOS process and the answer is no.

Oh Lord.... Our friend in Maryland got the same exact RFE and they did just the Vaccine Assessment, sent it into the USCIS field office as instructed and were approved 7 days later.

You should only need to get the Polio Vaccine and then have the Civil Surgeon complete the Vaccine Assessment part of the I-693 (if you can find one that will do just the assessment). There is a box on page 1 of the form #4.A. you should check indicating you are eligible for the Vaccine Assessment Only because you completed your Immigration Medical Exam overseas. Make sure you bring proof of the Polio Vaccine being administered (we got ours done at a CVS) AND bring a copy of the DS-3025 Vaccine Worksheet from the medical exam overseas. If you can't find a Civil Surgeon that will do just the assessment (all too common unfortunately) you will have to do the whole exam. If this is the case, still bring the copy of the DS-3025 and the proof of the polio vaccination.

The petitioner having received public benefits will have no effect on the AOS process. For the K-1 to AOS, marry within the 90 days AND file your AOS application within the 90 days as well would be my best advice. As long as you submit your marital bona fides and your husband is not otherwise inadmissible at that point, you shouldn't have an issue.