Hello all,
I tried using the search and advanced search function but couldn't find the exact answer to my question. I apologize if it has been answered before.
I, american citizen petitioner, have applied for a k-1 visa with my fiancee beneficiary, south korean citizen living in japan, and she has her interview coming up in a month or so.
About 7 years ago, she made the dumb decision to try shoplifting eyedrops from a super market. The eye drops had a value of about $5. She was caught before walking out the door, held by the police for 3 days (common in Japan) and then filed a guilty plea and paid a fine of about $1000. She is 30 now and this is the only instance of criminal conduct on her record. Japan does not distinguish statutorily between theft and petty theft. She pled guilty under the following code:
Chapter XXXVI Crimes of Theft and Robbery
(Theft)
Article 235A person who steals the property of another person commits the crime of theft and is punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 500,000 yen (~$4500 in 2017)
I wanted to check if my understanding of how this process works is correct.
First, shoplifting will generally be considered a crime of moral turpitude and cause her to be inadmissible to the US under INA 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). Because she was not under 18 and because the Japanese code has a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, she would not qualify for either of the INA 212(h) exceptions. Is my understanding correct that she will likely be denied due to the shoplifting charge or is there enough discretion at this point where there is a chance they will approve the k-1 visa despite the theft charge?
Second, assuming that she is found inadmissible, we then file form I-601. As she does not fit under either INA 212(h) exception, the I-601 form will be premised on extreme hardship that I would suffer should she not be allowed entry into the US. Is my understanding of use of form I-601 correct?
Finally, I wanted to double check under which country's law the maximum punishment for a crime of moral turpitude will be assessed. My understanding is that the law of the area where the crime took place is used but is that the case?
Thank you for your time and sorry for writing so much.