-
Posts
419 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by hplusj
-
Did your wife bring any documentation as supporting evidence, such as comingled finances or assets? Any proof of creating accounts stateside, or updating residency such as adding to lease or getting a state ID/driver's license? There's a lot more to the picture than just asking a few questions. I'd be curious about that first.
-
I thought Trump was the only one to speak in exaggerated hyperbole. Guess it's not a problem anymore. The whole argument is ludicrous. Wagging fingers and saying everyone else is lying without providing credible sources because they don't exist beyond some Reddit community freakout posts is a complete waste of time. But it is entertaining...
-
Request for initial evidence
hplusj replied to Danitodd's topic in K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress Reports
I would prepare yourself for this, and work on acceptance. The vetting process for immigrating to the USA is strict... or will be stricter than perhaps it has been in recent history. I suspect much of what they request, even if it seems redundant or useless, serves the purpose of allowing you to prove that you will capitulate to requests willingly. It's speculative on my part, but makes sense if you have a particularly discerning USCIS agent. Comply, and advance. Taking the stance that it isn't personal, but instead a process to earn a coveted right of entry to live in the US, will win you lower stress levels down the road. -
Thanks for weighing in! I'll have to look up Centrelink, first time that's even been mentioned (not sure what it is but I'll research). We understand that healthcare will be our responsibility but provided at least there is a partial pension to work with, we may be able to mitigate some of the costs was what I was trying to communicate. Thanks again!
-
Just a little update, based on a quick search: The US and Australia have a social security agreement, meaning my MIL can retain all or at least partial pension should she become a resident here. So that's good news. Unsure if that extends to Medicare but it's at least something supplemental to use towards healthcare.
-
Lots of great feedback here, and I appreciate the thoughtful concern from all. We are going to have to research the logistics of her pensioner's plan, which begins in Australia next year as she will have been a resident for ten years at that point. Being a Rhodesian is a unique circumstance because the home you're tied to, doesn't really exist anymore. My MIL escaped to South Africa, married and had a son there, and ultimately ended up relocating again when she remarried. The family she keeps in touch with is almost entirely in other countries already. We definitely have her best interests at heart and leaving her in Australia without loved ones, is a concern great enough to warrant a financial plan to get her here. Perhaps she will even be able to maintain her pensioner's abroad, I'm unsure of the stipulations of that, but rest assured I will be looking into it. We aren't millionaires but we want to include this in our 5 and 10 year plan if we can. Understanding end of life care and its demands as I just lost my father to an eleven year battle with cancer, I absolutely want to remain pragmatic about this. So, seeing as most of this advice is well-meaning yet anecdotal, I guess I'll have to take some time to delve into law specific to Iowa, as well as Australia. My husband is her only child, and I know she will want to be with us. She confirmed it again last night. Just need to work out how to make it happen, realistically.
-
Hi Ally, welcome to the thread and thanks for the update! The most I've seen is people getting their interview dates now: not much in the way of approvals. I think we are getting close though! Interviews scheduled surpassed approvals for our month and according to your report, it sounds like they're actively working their way towards October. Sending well wishes, keep us posted! <3
-
She's naturalized, has an Australian passport. We've talked about it, even if it's a sensitive issue given we're talking in terms of her husband passing. She does want to join us, she won't have any support from his family and her end of life will be extremely isolating. None of us, including her, will have community tied to Australia. She's not an invalid or anything, going into independent living will be a bit of overkill in terms of cost and logistics. But she does have diabetes, which is a preexisting we'll have to navigate with health costs.
-
Just MIL, which is why we're looking ahead. My step-DIL has his family there, and we hope he lives a good long while but we're attempting to prepare for when he leaves us. All super useful info, thanks! We'll do some digging into our state (Iowa). Yeah we're on ACA already, my husband and I. Might have private/through employment by the time she joins us but I don't think most plans allow you to add parents, so ACA will likely be the way to go. Not sure how far we can get on the marketplace with just a quote search, esp when we have 5+ years til this scenario comes into play, but I'll poke around.
-
Just opening this topic as I'm getting the gist, based on some research, that we will need to make significant financial planning happen in anticipation of the future here. My mother in law is a Rhodesian expat in Australia, who is remarried to a lovely man, but his family are not exactly supportive of her. We are likely going to petition for her to join us in the inevitability that he passes (and my husband has naturalized). They are already in their 70s so the question of how this will logistically and financially work is stumping us. Has anyone here taken steps to bring over an elderly parent? My understanding is that healthcare is the biggest hit, since they of course will not be eligible for Medicare with no US employment history. Are they eligible for programs from their country of origin, while here on a green card? We just want to give her the support and love she needs in her golden years. She definitely has health issues though, and of course as one ages that continues to progress. Just not sure how to prepare. Any advice would be appreciated.
-
I love that you're so excited for your future! For Jon and I, it was a lot of change and although 2024 was an amazing year, we had so much going on that it was hard not to feel completely anxious all the time. For him, he had to completely upend his life and move halfway around the world: a feat I can't possibly fathom. And for me, I actually changed states as well, trying to set up a living situation the two of us could foster together. Seems like now that we're in the holding pattern for a green card interview, I actually have a moment to look around and enjoy how far we've come. I'm wishing these "good life" feelings for you as well, down the line. Never lose that spirit of hope and joy. <3
-
US judge blocks Trump’s ban on trans people serving in the military A federal judge blocked Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender people from military service on Tuesday. US district judge Ana Reyes in Washington DC ruled that the president’s order to exclude transgender troops from military service likely violates their constitutional rights. She delayed her order by three days to give the administration time to appeal. “The court knows that this opinion will lead to heated public debate and appeals. In a healthy democracy, both are positive outcomes,” Reyes wrote. “We should all agree, however, that every person who has answered the call to serve deserves our gratitude and respect.” Reyes said she did not take lightly her decision to issue an injunction blocking Trump’s order, noting: “Judicial overreach is no less pernicious than executive overreach.” But, she said, it was also the responsibility of each branch of government to provide checks and balances for the others, and the court “therefore must act to uphold the equal protection rights that the military defends every day”. Just going to say the quiet part out loud: since when are judges supposed to be encouraging debate, instead of deciphering the law as it stands? This is politician rhetoric. The judicial's credibility is being decimated from the inside out. Judge Reyes claiming "all means all" and that this is a matter of equality, is preposterous. Enlistment is by nature discriminatory, and the DOJ determining those who have mental illnesses and/or supposed necessary application of therapies, medications, and surgeries as disqualifying, is not unreasonable. What IS unreasonable, is expecting medics to stock HRT overseas, taxpayers to cover cosmetic surgeries, and fellow service members to risk sharing a unit with someone who is not completely mentally and physically sound while putting their life on the line for this country. Sorry, I'm beyond incensed. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/18/judge-blocks-trump-executive-order-trans-military-ban
-
November 2024 AOS Filers
hplusj replied to Edward and Jaycel's topic in Adjustment of Status Case Filing and Progress Reports
I did a preliminary k1 timeline search to see if there was an uptick of recorded interview dates, and I ordered it by decision date. This only displays those who have been approved, but I can see that there's at least one or two interviews per page (10-20%), whereas there's a dearth of interviews in the months before. Keep in mind these are only recorded approvals, consider how much we've heard in the past couple weeks that people are having interviews booked for April. Also, I'm looking at the metrics from my stats location and you can see the uptick in the "interview scheduled" status during the first week of February. Considering Sec. Noem was confirmed and sworn in the last week of January, changing leadership at DHS, and Rubio as Sec. of State even earlier that week, we're potentially seeing changes in immigration vetting being enacted through that change in status. Seems like the timing's spot on.