Reynal2m

In Madrid it normally takes 2-3 months

Thanks for all your comments. I will give it a try with the assets first and if needed I will get a joint sponsor.

Yes, this is my residence. How about the US$90,000 on my savings account?

Hi, I am completing the I-864 as an independent travel agent in Miami, FL. My income for 2024 was $14,000, which is below the poverty guideline for a household of two (myself and the intending immigrant). I would like to know if I can use my assets to meet the financial requirement. For example, I have $90,000 in liquid savings and own an apartment valued at $300,000. If assets can be used, what documentation is required? Would providing the property deed and a bank letter showing that the funds have been held for more than 12 months be sufficient? Thank you for your guidance. Renzo & Reynaldo

We finally got approved on September 5, 2025. Wait time was 1 year, 5 months, and 10 days.

You’ll still need to have it translated if you plan to submit a petition for your new partner later. There are online translation services available for about $25.

For USCIS purposes, she is not required to change her last name, and there is no need to register it in the Philippines.

We got married online through Utah’s virtual marriage process — it was quick, simple, and completely valid. It’s especially worthwhile in places like the Dominican Republic, where same-sex marriage isn’t legal. To prove consummation, we submitted a hotel bill from our honeymoon and pictures...

Excellent! Glad to hear, thanks for sharing.

Hi, Hope you're doing well. Did you end up refiling? I came across a post on another forum where someone had a similar issue—their I-130 was denied due to an incorrect signature. They mentioned filing a motion to reopen and then submitting a new I-130. Apparently, they included the denial notice as supporting evidence with the new petition and were approved fairly quickly. I'm not very familiar with the process myself, but thought it might be helpful to pass this along. Best regards,

Try the White House one, is simple and easy:

We totally understand how you feel—we’re in the same boat. We’ve been waiting 16 months, and it’s painful to see others who filed the same day, (even earlier), already get approved. What makes it even harder is knowing there’s a backlog at our embassy, with interview wait times over a year. So even if USCIS finally approves us, we’re still looking at more than a year before we can even try to reunite in the U.S. After reviewing various recommendations online, I wanted to share a few strategies that have reportedly helped others in similar situations: Contact a Tier 2 USCIS officer – This can sometimes provide more detailed information or trigger movement on your case. Upload unsolicited evidence – Refile or submit Form I-129F (K-3 visa) – Reach out to your Senator and House Representative – Especially if you submitted a K-3 inquiry (this typically helps with the K-3, not the I-130 as they will say it's under normal timeframe). Write to the White House – Yes, really. Surprisingly, some people have received responses or seen progress after doing this. Send a letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Another way to raise awareness of your case at a higher level. File a CIS Ombudsman case assistance request – Helpful when your case is outside normal processing times and USCIS isn’t responding. As a last resort: File a writ of mandamus – This is a federal lawsuit to compel USCIS to make a decision when they’ve unreasonably delayed action. We wish you the best of luck and hope you receive an update from USCIS very soon. Warm regards, Reynaldo and Renzo

Best advice: I was denied a Spain visa back in 2021, so I decided to focus on traveling to other countries instead. I visited Colombia three times (had a blast!), went to Panama twice, and also traveled to Turkey and the UAE. When I finally reapplied for a Schengen visa, the officer at the interview noticed my travel history, commented that I travel a lot, and said she liked my profile—she approved my visa on the spot. Since then, I’ve successfully obtained two Schengen visas. Japan sounds very fun...

Put your question into ChatGPT and got a detailed explanation: Yes — that notation on your visa/green card refers to a medical classification and public health review requirement at your port of entry (POE) into the U.S. Let’s break it down: 🟡 “Class B” Medical Condition This refers to a medical condition that is not inadmissible, but still requires attention or monitoring. Class A: Serious medical conditions that could make someone inadmissible without a waiver. Class B: Less serious — does not prevent immigration, but requires follow-up after entry. 🟡 "req attn of USPHS at POE" USPHS = U.S. Public Health Service POE = Port of Entry This means that when you arrive in the U.S., Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may refer you to a CDC (Centers for Disease Control) or USPHS medical unit at the airport or border crossing for further evaluation or instructions related to your medical condition. 🟡 212(g)(2)(B) This is a reference to Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 212(g)(2)(B). It allows individuals with certain communicable diseases or health conditions to be admitted to the U.S. under conditions, such as reporting to U.S. health authorities. 🔍 Most Common Scenario This notation is commonly used for applicants who: Tested positive for TB (tuberculosis) screening but were not infectious Had Class B1 TB, meaning inactive TB, or old scarring from past TB Had other chronic conditions that aren’t grounds for denial but require follow-up ✅ What You Should Do At your POE, CBP may refer you to a CDC officer. You might receive instructions or a packet to give to a local health department. You may be required to attend a free follow-up medical appointment within 30 days of entry. 🟢 Important: This Does Not Affect Your Immigration Status You can still enter the U.S. and activate your green card. The note is only a health follow-up requirement, not a denial or restriction.

Wouldn't they get mad if you remind them?