I get your point about the Turner v. Blinken case, but that ruling was specific to administrative processing (AP). It didn’t address delays in scheduling interviews, which is a separate issue. The consulate controls interview availability, not NVC, and if they’re not fulfilling their obligation to process cases within a reasonable time, that could still justify a WOM. Just because 15 months in AP was ruled ‘reasonable’ doesn’t mean indefinite delays for an interview would hold up in court. It’s not the same scenario.