I made a post a while back, and I'm looking for people's opinions on whether what I have managed to accrue will be enough to demonstrate to a consular office that my mother had physical presence in the USA for 5 years.
I did a lot of digging and I've gotten the following:
- an employment letter from Goldman Sachs detailing the time period when my mother was employed by the Boston office (1993-1996),
- W-2 records from 1999 showing she was employed in Boston,
- tax returns from 1996 showing her Boston address,
- vaccination records from 1996 carried out in a Massachusetts hospital,
- and a property deed showing that she and my father bought the same house shown on the same tax returns, in 1992 and then sold it in 1999.
- On top of this, we have the SS certified record of earnings from 1993 to 1999.
We are trying to prove 7 years here('92-'99), from the day they bought the house to the day they sold it, with tax returns,W-2s, earnings record, vaccination records and employment letters during this period to demonstrate the presence in the country. I have heard these forms of evidence are solid, but I'm curious for a second opinion, especially from those familiar with this type of interview.
Also, I have heard that the consular officer makes the decision at the appointment, and that your documents are returned to you at the end? So effectively, I will know what the decision is at the end of the interview after we've gone through the evidence together, and they won't keep the documents and notify me weeks later of the decision?
Thank you for taking the time to respond to my queries.