Stephie C
Members-
Posts
77 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by Stephie C
-
Thanks for the suggestion. Which congress person would I contact as I live in the UK and have never resided in the US. The application are being processed by four different service centres so not even a common state there. I find it very strange that an immigration service cannot communicate with people outside of their country, surely that is the majority of their clientele.
-
Hi, I am trying to request that my husband and children’s I-130 applications are expedited but am struggling to get the request through to the right people. I have called the USCIS a number of times, they have informed me that the request has to be dealt with a tier two agent. As I am outside the US and do not have a US address or phone number they have to email me to request further information on my expedite request. The issue is marked as urgent and I have been told they will contact me in 72hours. I have been through this stage three times and each time I receive an email from a no response email address stating that the application is within the processing time but nothing about expediting. The last time I called an agent suggested that I mailed the request, with all the information and supporting documents directly to the service centres dealing with the applications. I did this, sent them Royal Mail tracked and signed, (at great expense) so I know that the letters were delivered five days ago but still there is no change on my online account to show that an expedite request is being considered. Anyone have any advice on what to do to get this request in front of the right people, I have been trying for over a month? Thank you very much for your help.
-
Thanks for the response, luckily no additional consent will be required from the father as the judge has overruled him. The only way it could be an issue is if he makes any additional applications. Again the need for consent is taken away from the parents and in the hands of the judge. The wording of the order has been checked by a US family lawyer from the county we plan to move to. They have confirmed that it contains all the correct terminology, so I hope it is sufficient. My reasoning for requesting the process being sped up ( other than meeting our proposed timeframe) is to ensure that if it is ever taken back to court I can honestly say I have done everything in my power to stick to the original plan. This is why I have also previously asked about K3/K4 visas. Thank you for your help.
-
Thanks for your reply. Yes I’m aware that the I130 is only the first stage and the process and the next stage was included in the time frame. That is why I am considering applying for it to be expedited now to allow time for the next phase and still meet the original proposed leaving time. If I make the request I will ask that they all be approved early or none of them. I do have the option to leave before my husband but would have to be able to relocate with all of the kids. Thanks for your help
-
Thank you all for your comments. The details of the court order can’t be shared on an open forum as it would put me in breach of the Children’s Act. The details also are not relevant to answer the question. When making an application for permanent removal from the jurisdiction it is standard practice to supply the courts with a plan and a timeframe. The judge made their decision based on the plan and timeframe which was accurate at the time the statement was submitted to the court, this included accurate and up to date processing time supplied by the USCIS. The judge felt that the timeframe was appropriate as did the other party’s legal team. Since the order was approved by the judge our processing time has been dramatically altered. This means that certain parts of the plan cannot be met if the processing time remains the same. As the order was granted on the information that was provided to the judge at the time, if elements of it should change there is a possibility that the father could make a new application to the family court requesting a Specific Issues Order to stop the relocation. This would not be an appeal as he does not have permission to make an appeal, it would be a new application. All applications are accepted regardless of their merit or validity. There would be a number of gatekeeper hearings before it is reviewed by a judge ( the only person who has the authority to make a judgment on such matters). This initial process can take several months. The existing sealed order remains valid until a new order is passed but it would be incredibly risky to remove her during proceedings, for risk of being accused of abduction. The chances of the father’s application being successful are slim but it would delay the relocation and put the child back into proceedings, not a pleasant experience for a child and she has already done enough of them. Past experience tells me that if the father has the opportunity to be disruptive, he will be. part of the family relocating first is not an option, I am the primary caregiver for the children, if my husband had to take on this role then he would have to quit his job. That scenario would put our family in severe financial hardship. So I think a better question to pose to the group is: Would making a request for our cases to expedited harm or further delay our applications in anyway? Thank you for reading and for your advice.
-
Thanks for your comments. The proposed plan presented to the courts was based on accurate information at the time from the USCIS based on our applications. In March the USCIS increased the estimated processing time considerably for our applications. This is why the court timeframe can no longer be met. Getting anything passed through the family courts in England takes years. Returning to court would not be in the best interest of the child. Details of private proceedings pertaining to a child won’t be shared on an open forum.
-
Thanks for your reply. No all of the i130’s, for my husband and all of the children were filed at the same time. The USCIS website stated the estimated time until a decision. I used this information as evidence in court that my timeframe was reasonable. The court order was granted in January but in March the USCIS increased the estimated processing time for between four and nine months for all of the applications, hence why I’m now concerned that the timeframe won’t be met. The court order doesn’t state a date when she has to leave, just that she is allowed from a certain date. My concern is there were a number of factors that led the judge to decide to let her go, if these factors change the father could potentially take us back to court and in the UK that could take about 2 years to sort out. Thank for your help
-
Hi, I have made I-130 applications for my husband and children, all still pending. I had to get permission from the family court in the UK to remove my eldest daughter from the jurisdiction. We were granted permission, based on our proposed plan, including timeframe. The applications are taking longer than anticipated to process and I am now concerned that we will not be able to meet our proposed timeframe. One possible outcome if this were to happen is that the child’s father takes us back to court to revoke the original order. Would needing to meet a court order’s timeframe be sufficient grounds for requesting and expedition of all of the I-130 applications? Thank for the help.
-
Unfortunately they are not, I got my citizenship through my mother and we have always been in the Uk. I will definitely be applying for the IR2 for the kids as dual nationality for them is one of our main reasons for moving. I thought we could get K3/k4 initially so that we could all move quicker and hopefully at the same time, then if if any of the i-130’s are approved before the k visas are issued the I-130 would cancel them out and if not we could do an adjustment of status once they are approved. Is this correct? Thanks so much for your help.
-
Thank you once again for your help and advice. Do you think is worth filing and I-129F for my husband and listing the kids on it? My hope in doing this would be to speed up the whole family getting over there to meet my husband’s work commitments. I haven’t do this yet as on the US gov. Website it states that a it is for children who have ‘no claim to citizenship’ as the kids will become citizens when they reside in the US with me I was unsure if they were eligible. Am I correct in my understanding? Thanks very much.
-
Why is it not desirable? They are currently reviewing the applications for two children under 5 but not the older child or the two children who are under two. Surely seeing the family as a whole would give the applications more validity and reduce the possibility of separating a family unit by approving visa at vastly different times.