W199

There are 2 ways 2 login, one is using ID.ME and the other uses login.gov. One of those does require a driver's license, which didn't work for me because of a name mismatch with my middle name. But I was able to use the other one with my passport (which had my correct middle name), to login.

You can also try logging in to your SSA account online to verify your account and the name it is under.

If its one of the premium cards by places like Chase, they are likely trying to do more than just a SSN verification or using a different system than directly checking with the SSA. I had a similar issue with my Wife's SSN. We also had tried it with Discover. It initially was not verified because of the married name vs SSN name mismatch. When we reapplied in her maiden name it verified and got the card. The moral is to try to open a Discover card in your name. Then you will know if your SSN can be verified or not. In all likelyhood it is, just the security systems of those other cards can be a pain ...

I speak from experience, my ex and I agreed upon a generous amount we'd send monthly, much more than the typical family income in her Country. But she was the most incredible and amazing charming actress ever. She had no intentions of abiding by that. She had dreams of making her family rich. It didn't end well. I just hope you don't fall into the same trap as I did. Think with your head. Good luck

Sounds like she wants to work in order to send a large percentage of money back to Mexico to help her family. That is a normal priority and culture so I'm not saying that is bad. But since you said this issue is causing friction, are you OK with her doing that? Or do you expect the majority of the money to be part of your family's expenses? As you know, expenses will dramatically increase .. car, and very high insurance rates for new USA drivers, health and medical, clothes, food, etc... travel, .. What happens if she loses her job and she can no longer send money back? Do you have an agreement of what you'll do in that case? Since work and money is causing friction, if there is a large disparity of current wealth, then you should consider doing a prenup to make sure you are on the same page.

I wonder if the CFO is getting more strict due to a rise in abuse cases? The USA embassy in Manila automatically mailed my fiancee a copy of the processed I-129F. If yours never received one, then I am guessing the I-129F is now in her sealed K-1 visa packet and you might be too late to get a copy. But that is a guess. I hope you have your own copy of the I-129F. I would just send that to her, maybe get it notarized and then fight with the CFO if needed.

And your daughter will need to show both passports in order to depart the Philippines. By the way, did your Wife get her CFO certificate? Did you register your daughter with the CFO?

When my Filipino Wife and I recently went back to visit the Philippines I accidently used my Wife's QR code which obviously didn't match my US passport, etc... (note, even with one account, you still need to select each person individually and generate a QR code). Then my Wife reported the immigration officer had an issue with her QR code (because I had used her code), but let her enter anyways. We had no issues departing the Philippines. Therefore, I suspect, its not overly strict.

Of course there is no rule saying your wife needs to have screenshots of video calls with their family. Likewise, of course, if they asked you for them, doesn't make them a communist. And its nonsense that you say they have less than a 50% chance of passing. My Wife passed after less than a minute of questions, and we follow this very carefully, and it is extremely rare that someone is denied, and it is always for a pretty good reason. It is very simple. There are a lot of creeps and lets say "bad men" marrying and taking advantage of the Filipinos. Perhaps vice versa too, but that is another matter. There is a huge amount of abuse. If fact, during my Wife's CFO seminar the instructor got a text message from one of her attendees begging for help for getting back to the Philippines. The CFO exists to protect against this abuse. If they sense a red flag they are free to ask for anything such as screenshots or videos of her talking to your family. That seems reasonable to me if there was a reason they had a red flag, You are bring a Filipino and her young child, who probably don't have any resources and will be totally dependent on you. They don't want them to be abused. As I said they see it all the time. What's the big deal, it seems pretty simple to have some video calls with your family, to help make sure they will be safe, and to give her more contacts in case of an emergency. The way your reacting and insulting the Philippines might have been reflected in her interview and gave them a concern, which in turn made them ask for some additional information. Like others have said, the CFO is typically a breeze. Though I admit, its possible she might have gotten a new CFO agent who is poorly trained and inexperienced, so I'm not judging you. But you should just understand they are trying to protect her and a little daughter against abuse or being abandoned when brought across the planet and be a little more understanding see it from their perspective.

Yes, a tax return transcript is much better than sending in the actual tax return with all the forms. What year tax transcript did you send in? It askes for the current year, e.g. Tax year ending 2024 which is filed by April 2025. Note, there are enough issues and complications which you appear confused about and likely not to get perfectly correct. Since you already got this one RFE that you might want to get some processional help with, e.g. lawyer or agency, otherwise you risk getting denied and starting over.

If you are correct, then you should be all set and shouldn't worry. As crazy cat explained, you will just need to explain the misunderstanding and provide the necessary proof. Since so much is riding on you doing this correctly and meeting the legal requirements for USCIS to send it back to the consulate, you should seriously consider finding a lawyer or other legal help to help you with that. Please post the redacted NOID here when you get it.

In this post you said the officer was a very young girl. But in your other post you said she was a "hag". Quite the opposite. "not qualified" sounds like the marriage certificate was fake or that the marriage wasn't valid because she was not divorced in a previous marriage, or something similar on your side. But I have no idea. It is often very hard or impossible to know the true reasons. As others have said, its unlikely its because she wants to see the world, because for a CR1/IR1 case they have a higher bar to reach in order to deny. Also, no .. there is no denial quota ... And there are very good reasons why they always ask questions for which they have the answers to ..

Yes, that letter is so much better. Anything longer will have no hope of even being read. To be very clear, the consular will know instantly from his DS-160 and the background check exactly what he wants to know to approve or deny the visa. That letter will only help if he is basically already approved or needs just a little bit of assurance . That is, it won't come close to overturning what would otherwise be a typical denial. They are also trained not to use or rely on documents, so it will be rare and lucky if they even read it. Finally, to even know when and how to submit to the officer will take some skill and luck. You can't just give it to them and tell them to "please read it." Good luck.

Can you try to recreate the full transcript of the interview, word for word, as best as your wife can remember, starting at the very beginning to the final denial? That will help determine what really went wrong.

Wow, nice, thanks for posting that. That letter is a much better example. Maybe you can use chatgpt and ask it to shorten and summarize the support letter from your husband .. hehe