Agree with this.
Do not agree with this. Yes, having a baby on its own may not cut for evidence of bonafide marriage. It's only one piece of evidence. USCIS may also be interested in learning how finances are comingled and what is couple's living arrangement. But to fully disregard it?
Following similar logic:
- Married couples file taxes jointly because they get better tax return in most cases
- Married couples put each other on car insurance / health policy because it's cheaper than paying two full policies
- Married couples live together and put both names on lease / mortgage because they split costs VS paying for two places
- Married couples pay bills together because it's cheaper
- Married couples travel together because at least lodging is cheaper for 2 compared to a single person getting a hotel room.
I could go on with this list... I don't agree with this logic. If babies were insignificant, birth certificates would not be part of recommended evidence, officers would never ask about kids / plans of having kids. From VJ reports it's evident that children are one of the signs of bonafide marriage. Not an ultimate evidence that overshadows everything, but can play a positive role in approving the case.
Saying all that, @angelic4444 is paying lawyer. I can assume the lawyer knows the case better than we do. Unless the lawyer is inexperienced, they may have reasons to wait for AOS filing we don't know about. I would file and add more evidence down the line, but that's me.