-
Posts
13,008 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
142
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by OldUser
-
May 2024 - AOS Filers
OldUser replied to M and Mike's topic in Adjustment of Status Case Filing and Progress Reports
How do you know the interview was waived? If it's through chat with Emma / calling USCIS I'd still be prepared to go to interview. The only time you know for sure the interview is waived, is when you get GC approved. Before that - anything is possible -
May 2024 - AOS Filers
OldUser replied to M and Mike's topic in Adjustment of Status Case Filing and Progress Reports
What is it for? -
DHS can revoke immigration visas
OldUser replied to EatBulaga's topic in US Immigration News and Discussion
Visas could be revoked in the past, and even when not revoked, DHS could tell CBP not to let a person in. Looks like it's about closing avenues for disputing such discretionary decision. -
You're not a preparer or enterpreter. Usually a lawyer and translator would complete these. You can leave these blank. It's normal to be filling forms together. Just make sure your significant othet understand everything you're writing and knows the facts for interview.
-
N-400 November 2024 Filers
OldUser replied to dc35's topic in US Citizenship Case Filing and Progress Reports
Lawyers who work in immigration often mention this. And this is logical. Some countries are known to be a threat to US security, or higher on fraud. USCIS and other agencies working on background check have to dig deeper to ensure the individual is safe to be granted the ultimate immigration benefit - US citizenship, which is difficult to revoke. You can watch YouTube video of USCIS director herself talking about security and other things: Sadly, it is the reality. A Pakistani or Syrian national would probably have to wait longer for security checks as opposed to Italian and Danish. The latter are generally safer in the eyes of US immigration and their police / security cooperates much better with US providing information on individual. -
Most likely you're going to be OK, as long as marriage was legitimate. Of course, it IO found some fraud indicators, such as quick divorce after entering the US and getting GC, they have to dig deeper to see if it was a sham marriage. I would have brought a lawyer with me for this interview.. If fraud is found, USCIS can go as far as trying to take your GC away. Good luck and keep us posted.
- 8 replies
-
- n400
- citizenship
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
N-400 Interview Scheduled - no letter, yet...
OldUser replied to Charlie00's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
Nothing with USCIS is failsafe... -
Essentially, at best USCIS ignores the problems and denies it. At worst, they hide data and become more obscure. For example, when I filed I-751, I could look up processing timer per each individual service center and field office. Now when you go to https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/, you can only filter by "All service centers" and "All field offices". Essentially, the details are being hidden. I wonder if it's because of large differences. Some offices and service centers had 2+ year estimated time difference compared to others...
-
K1 Fiance Visa. Relationship Proof
OldUser replied to Tiny Cat's topic in K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedures
I-94 can also work https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/ -
This was extensively discussed here: The gist of it is... While USCIS allows early filing (90 day window) based on permanent residence requirement, the marital union requirement does not have the same exception. E.g. if you file early based on residence, but you aren't married for 3+ years living together, the case is denied.
-
Primary residence cannot be used as an asset. All sorts of assets are routinely ignored by USCIS - stocks, cash, gold bars. A qualifying joint sponsor with good income is the safest path.
-
This is applicable in OP's case because vaccinations were not completed on DS-3025. If they were completed, no I-693 would have been needed. Just a copy of DS-3025 would have sufficed. Note the language in quoted message: "If you are required to submit Form I-693, or a partial Form I-693 (such as the Vaccination Record)," K-1s with completed DS-3025 and all vaccinations are not required to submit I-693 All others adjusting status are typically required to submit I-693
-
Doesn't matter in this case, you needed to physically live together as married couple for 3 years. Meaning you could not use early filing window to file, because you would be below 3 years of living together. Challenging it is pointless, USCIS followed the law. Just refile when both conditions are true: - She's been a resident for 3 years - She lived in marital union with US citizen for 3 years. And US citizen has been a citizen for all 3 years.
-
I'm aware of this calculator, USCIS is doing something nice there, which they aren't even required to do by law. Even if OP used this calculator, he would have put Resident Since date + 3 years in the date field, but ignored other messages saying all other criteria should be met such as living in marital union. This calculator can be improved by asking questions: - 3 or 5 years rule - How many days spent outside the US - If 3 year rule, when started living together - Any trips over 180 days But again, this is not a service USCIS is required to provide. I think I may build one for fun myself one day...
