OldUser

Nobody knows ahead. You may be approved on the spot with same day oath ceremony. Or USCIS would need time to decide.

I thought you were in the process or removing conditions on I-751 earlier this year? Did you already naturalize and now sponsoring somebody else? Are you sure you're eligible to do that this soon?

Did you fill the number of household members correctly on I-864? If yes, and you still got RFE, you may need a joint sponsor

You can, it doesn't hurt.

Good question. Non-US citizens cannot even file K-1 for fiance.

There's similar discussions on Reddit etc. I don't believe N-400 pushes USCIS to decide on I-751 faster in most cases. However, I do believe it speeds up the process for naturalizing overall. E.g. if you submit N-400 after I-751 approval, it may take 6-9 months from then. If you submit N-400 while I-751 is pending, you'll likely get naturalized within 1-3 months after I-751 approval. That's the difference.

You can still file I-865 any time.

I'd think she used new passport to enter the US but along with visa from old passport. You'll likely need scans for both passports in the packet.

This depeneds on the risk tolerance. Knowing how often packages meant for Austria get shipped to Australia by mistake via FedEx, UPS etc...

Tax residence and legal residence are two different things. "You will be considered a United States resident for tax purposes if you meet the substantial presence test for the calendar year. To meet this test, you must be physically present in the United States (U.S.) on at least: 31 days during the current year, and 183 days during the 3-year period that includes the current year and the 2 years immediately before that, counting: All the days you were present in the current year, and 1/3 of the days you were present in the first year before the current year, and 1/6 of the days you were present in the second year before the current year." https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/substantial-presence-test If you spent enough time in the US (see above), you're considered a US person for tax purposes. This is different to US national or US citizen.

Your case won't be complicated by applying few months late. It will be more complicated because now you have at least two, maybe three appointments in the US which you cannot miss: 1. Biometrics (may be waived) 2. N-400 interview 3. Oath 4. Obtaining US passport All of these require you being in the US. This contradicts your need to travel abroad: Essentially, are you ready to stay in the US for the next 6-9-12-18 months to become a citizen? This is the best scenario. The worst is if your N-400 gets denied after this long wait.

Boarding foil is what you need. It's not free however. Filing fee is $575 at the moment of writing.

I doubt employers would accept it. They'd expect EAD or GC. What does it look like? Can you attach a redacted copy here please?

Visa for married people. It's way better than K-1. With K-1 the immigrant needs to go through Adjustment of Status in the US (extra $$$$ and extra wait). With CR-1, once immigrant enters the US they'll be able to work and travel outside of the US. Green Card arrives in few weeks in the mail.

Marry, go via CR-1. Green Card holders can have their businesses established in / expanded to the US. E-2 visa is probably not realistic for business like this (unless he has spare $100000+ to invest?) plus it doesn't lead to Green Card.

There's no mistake, you can still get SSN. Cheer up and show a big smile to SSA staff 😁

I wish USCIS cared about what we immigrants want. But they don't. If nothing, Writ of Mandamus is the last resort.

Also, if eligible, OP can play GC lottery every year.

What's the penalty for this violation out of curiosity?

You're right. I looked at the PDFs again and they are at least 4 pages long. I guess I was spreading misinformation about those being 1 page long.

@YellingSeal from the posts you published so far, it's not clear whether you're guys working on repairing the marriage. Staying married but living separately for the sole purpose of getting I-751 is a bad strategy, essentially boarderline of immigration fraud. What would really help you case: 1. Decide whether you're working on marriage and moving back together OR divorcing. 2. If divorcing, and on good terms, it's way better if your spouse writes a detailed statement about your relationship, how it developed and then ended. The US citizen should say the marriage was entered in good faith and they don't object you receiving GC. Often, these statements are crafted by lawyer based on the story and facts, then signed by US citizen. Bringing US citizen to interview when you guys don't even live together is a bad bad idea. You'll get separated and it would be easy to accuse both of you of commiting fraud. You see, even couples living together may find some questions difficult. If you don't live together and don't even know each other that well (only married for short time), your answers won't match.

Let's get the terminology straight.... A bonafide marriage and a marriage entered in good faith might seem similar, but they have distinct meanings, especially in legal contexts: Bonafide Marriage: This term is often used to describe a marriage that is genuine and not entered into for the purpose of deceiving others. In immigration law, for instance, a bonafide marriage is one where the primary intention of the marriage is to establish a life together as spouses, and not merely to gain immigration benefits. Marriage Entered in Good Faith: This phrase is generally used to mean that at the time of entering into the marriage, both parties intended to establish a genuine marital relationship. It's a testament to the intentions of the parties at the time of the marriage. Even if the marriage later falls apart, as long as it was entered into with genuine intentions, it can still be considered as entered in good faith.In many legal contexts, particularly in immigration, the distinction is crucial. A marriage that is bonafide and entered in good faith is typically seen as legitimate, while one that is not could lead to legal complications, especially if one party is seeking benefits based on the marital relationship.

It likely won't work. No, it's increased risk of getting it lost in transit. Plus as you say the tenant is flaky. I think the entire situation is flaky and can fire back at ROC stage... You have an address registered where you and your LPR spouse allegedly live, but instead there's some other tenant. If USCIS finds out somehow, you'll have to explain.

Exactly, that's why I also mentioned that being a citizen is required.👍

Neither forwarding or Hold Mail works. I tried myself. Signature is often not required. But if something goes wrong, either the mail will be returned back to USCIS and GC destroyed or it will get lost. Then it's the painful I-90 with potentially months of wait. I'd make an effort to actually go home for few days and receive it.