OldUser

That's one of the reasons. Another reason is foreign documents in maiden name, such as passport. In some countries it's a hassle to update name. And for Indian citizens for example, it doesn't make sense to go through this whole thing if they cannot hold dual citizenship after naturalizing in the US. Also, an unpopular opinion... The blunt truth is, considering half of marriages in the US fall apart, and this is more likely in the initial 2-5 years, it may be a hassle for an immigrant to change names back and forth. When somebody changes their name at naturalization stage, it's a more consious decision not related to immigration at all. At that point the marriage is typically stronger and one can make such a big change to their identity without a doubt.

No this is not mandatory. Feel free skipping this. I made an effort of including affidavits, because I always try to submit as much evidence as possible VS minimum for approval.

As far as I know, WoM can also be used before the interview happened. At least, that's according to a lawyer who specializes in suing USCIS. The rationale is, the naturalization can be granted by immigration judge, and USCIS wants to go through file themselves instead, so they get movitated to interview / issue a decision.

You can start with inquiry into your case when it's outside of normal processing times. This can be filed electronically https://egov.uscis.gov/processing-times/ Then, you can involve a congressman. Finally, if neither works, you can file Writ of Mandamus to get a decision. This can be done yourself for $402 or with a lawyer for ~$5000. This forces USCIS to take some action. Or you can keep waiting.

I vote for rescheduling travel plans unless it's urgent. There's not that many things more important than becoming a US citizen. The problem with rescheduling oath, it can take months to get another invitation and USCIS can forget about the future citizen altogether 😃

Time to think about rescheduling unless it's an urgent trip?

If you filed in August 2023, it only been 5-6 months. It's perfectly normal wait time. Whenever I read N-400 is the fastest and easiest step, I scratch my head. It is the most serious part of immigration journey, with USCIS granting the ultimate immigration benefit that's very hard to revoke. No wonder they take time. They have go go through entire immigration file to see if everything was done correctly at visa, AOS (if applicable) and I-751 stage (if applicable). As one lawyer says, it's their last chance to deport somebody. No that they would deport anybody who's case taking longer. They just examine everything very closely. Plus the usual backlogs.

Awesome!

It's not extreme at all. It's a tool that works.

I'd apply on 5 year mark after DUI incident to be sure. I'd also speak to an immigration lawyer. If this is a deportable offence, you may be better off not applying at all.

Was he present in Nigeria at the court when divorce was granted? Is he sure divorce is real?

Most importantly: does your mother want to go this route? Permanent residence should not be taken lightly. Not only she'd be stuck in the US for over a year while adjusting, in the future she should be spending majority of her time in the US. You should also file I-131. None of have a crystal ball to tell whether it's a completely problem free case. It all depends on health, criminal history (if any), US immigration history (if any).

I'm not a lawyer and this is not a legal advice. Yes Practically, no. You can change the employers, but requirements are stricted compared to H1B making it very difficult Yes

Agree with this. I can't see how one can use Visa A to enter and continue on status B in the US. A proper E2 visa needed for reentry in my opinion too. Essentially, OP should not travel outside of the US unless ready to reapply for visa.

Well, but the change of status already occured. I don't think the visa is valid???

Divorce decree, all passports, all documents issued by USCIS, all tax return transcripts. Practice answering questions using short precise sentences and "yes/no" where possible.

It's up to your wife when she decides to file to be exact 😊 You're just a moral support at N-400 stage. I recommend she files herself to avoid any mistakes. She's the only one responsibe for her own naturalization.

GC is different to EAD. Restriction cannot be removed while on EAD. The EAD card itself is authorization... But once GC is approved, it's a different story. Agree about I-751

As far as I know this only is possible if beneficiary already lives with the sponsor and employment source is going to continue after becoming LPR. Similarly to using assets, it works half of the time.

Generally no

They don't care. 1. You could have had a completely new passport with no stamps 2. LPRs do not usually get any stamps after they have GC in hand, when entering or leaving the US 3. Airline is not CBP, they don't have authority to enquire, other than checking valid documents, which you have

I'm not a lawyer, but my wasn't your F2 visa cancelled after you changed your status to E2? Do you have any stamp or anything like that proving you're on E2 now?

She can go into administrative processing even without denial. There's no way of knowing, this is purely speculation.

Thank you that's great to know. Do you know how long this has been the case? Can this change any time?

Congressman, lawyers etc do not have power over US consulates / embassies when it comes to decisions. Nobody has a right to come to the US. Only a privilege, unfortunately.