Family
Members-
Posts
5,300 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by Family
-
A former model who says she met Donald Trump through the late sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein has accused the former president of groping and sexually touching her in an incident in Trump Tower in 1993, in what she believed was a “twisted game” between the two men. Stacey Williams, who worked as a professional model in the 1990s, said she first met Trump in 1992 at a Christmas party after being introduced to him by Epstein, who she believed was a good friend of the then New York real estate developer. Williams said Epstein was interested in her and the two casually dated for a period of a few months. “It became very clear then that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together,” Williams said. The alleged groping occurred some months later, in the late winter or early spring of 1993, when Epstein suggested during a walk they were on that he and Williams stop by to visit Trump at Trump Tower.… https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/23/donald-trump-accuser-stacey-williams-jeffrey-epstein
-
Be it David Koch or ( insert name )…the big boy billionaires craft the spontaneity of most populist movements. Little Donnie charmed the pants off the “ Govt Done Me Wrong “ base and before you knew it Republican Party got skewered … .. the “ quiet part” was not only said out loud, but on the most powerful bullhorn .
-
Interesting thread ! Congratulations on success. I just glanced at 1st post above and the obvious issue jumped out: I-130 filed 07/17/2015 but @DELETEMYACCOUNTx keeps referring to the Priority Date as 11/10/2015. That is incorrect, as PD is same as filing date. ..so 07/17/2015. For the historical value of your post 😂, could you upload a copy of the I-130 receipt notice or approval, whatever u have handy…I don’t want you to stay stuck on “ your right numbers “ formula! lol Hats off to heroes of this thread ( @appleblossom et al) who encouraged OP to go to the interview.
-
Frankel encourages his students to move past Trump as an individual and to think of Trumpism as a historical and political phenomenon. “Trump is a tool for thinking about patterns of American history we didn’t pay much attention to in the early part of the 21st century.” Specifically, Frankel guides students to narrow in on “the history of American populism; of racism, anti-immigrant sentiment, and its historicity; issues of masculinity, politics, and spectacle; as well as the subject position of the businessman as a cultural hero. We also have the history of ‘fake news.’” Weaving these historical threads together allows the students to map “what was in the DNA of American democracy that was conducive to something like Trumpism.” https://www.newschool.edu/nssr/story/Trump-as-History/
-
Post office receipt and pending time of I-290 B are not an automatic/extension. But unless her employer flags her, she just goes about her business and keeps working. You can always involve your congressman, google is your friend 😂, download their authorization form and ask they help you get an expedite as wife in danger of losing job. ‘Once you have a case# , you can also call USCIS ( ask for tier 2) to request expedite
-
Former GOP Rep. Upton endorses Harris over ‘chaos’ of Trump "Watching Trump day after day, he's ignored the advice of many senior, respected Republicans to stay on the issues," Upton told The Detroit News. "Instead, he's still talking about the election being stolen, trashing women left and right. He's just totally unhinged,” he said, “We don't need this chaos. We need to move forward, and that's why I'm where I am." https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/10/24/2024-elections-live-coverage-updates-analysis/fred-upton-endorses-kamala-harris-michigan-00185282
-
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell delivered a scathing assessment of the modern Republican Party in an upcoming biography, saying the “MAGA movement is completely wrong” and that Ronald Reagan “wouldn’t recognize” the party today The Kentucky Republican did not mince words, calling Trump a “sleazeball,” a “narcissist” and saying that the former president is “stupid as well as being ill-tempered.” He added that Trump is “not very smart, irascible, nasty, just about every quality you would not want somebody to have.” https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/23/politics/mcconnell-trump-gop-new-book/index.html
-
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Each I-864 refers to a principal immigrant and family members that are coming at the same time -
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Forget household member term ..it confuses the issue as in this context refers to I-864 A , which does NOT apply here. .. -
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
You are not grasping this clearly. I will attempt The Petitioner/ Sponsor ( your father) fills out an I-864 for EACH son/daughter. If dad is married , he counts as 2, if single he is 1. If dad sponsored someone other than wife, add one more to dad the Petitioner/Sponsor ‘s I-864 A-Family 4 plus Petitioner Sponsor 1 , the total is 5 ( I sent you link see income needed) B-Family 5 plus 1 , needs 6 C-Family 5 plus 1 needs 6 D-Family 4 plus 1 needs 5 The Joint Sponsor w $200 K income , starts out with 5 ( even though they are not LPR yet and petitions are pending, wife and children are counted as dependents. So Joint Sponsor does an I-864 for each family A-Family 4 plus Joint Sponsor 5 , needs 9 B-Family 5 plus Joint Sponsor 5, needs 10 C-Family 5 plus Joint Sponsor 5, needs 10 D-Family 4 plus Joint Sponsor 5, needs 9 -
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Your rich friend will qualify as a joint sponsor for everyone ( all 18 ) of your family as follows He needs income for 14 and clearly exceeds it ( 5 of his own. 4 previously sponsored, 5 new of yours ) -
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Do not delay anyone’s case because you are being misinformed on what is actually required. Go get some legal help before making decisions. You can easily find a Joint Sponsor that makes enough . If Joint Sponsor is single ( for example) , he only needs income for 6. Look at poverty guidelines. AND most importantly, he can be Joint Sponsor for ALL of them Not sure why everyone responding is telling you they need to qualify on income for 23 immigrants. That is absolutely incorrect -
US citizen filed for children over 21
Family replied to MSSF's topic in Bringing Family Members of US Citizens to America
Each I-864 only needs to show qualifying income for that immigrant family plus 1 ( sponsor) . So family of 5 add 1 and show income for six only. It does NOT matter that you are also sponsoring the other families. They are NOT counted until each sponsored immigrant is granted LPR…so perfectly fine fo all siblings go through process at same time -
Jailed reporters, silenced networks: What Trump says he'd do to the media if elected He joked that the prospect of prison rape would loosen reporters' lips about their sources. "When this person realizes that he is going to be the bride of another prisoner shortly, he will say, 'I'd very much like to tell you exactly who that was,'" Trump told an appreciative crowd at a Texas rally. And Trump said he wouldn't limit it to the reporters: "The publisher too — or the top editors." He made the same claim two weeks later at an Ohio rally. https://www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists
-
Problem with Application for Citizenship.
Family replied to AnnettefromDL's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
Best case scenario, supervisor approves. Worst case is still a good outcome after they review . They will send you a request for evidence specific to the incident basically asking for court and arrest record. …unless you already had that court certification that stated “ records no longer exist” You can preempt by : 1. Run your own FBI prints to show no other arrests 2. Request a Certified Copy of the Minute Order from court. They will send you a Letter as Custodian of Records that spells out such is not available. ‘Great call on explaining your misunderstanding of Q. You will be fine. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-f-chapter-2