Family

Is this you ? Definitely don’t give up.

Thank you, I assumed current status was issue, for the I-485 denial . I am considering the filing of the I-485 in 2019 as sufficient to claim he met “ sought to acquire “ condition for CSPA argument. Am also giving him kudos for arguing CSPA and reinstatement of his F-2 A category when he completed NVC and got DQ. Am guessing he filed an I-824 as well. So hats off OP. Don’t give up, do what I suggested , but know the most important player is LegalNet , if the embassy decides to ghost you again https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM050201.html Filing an Application to Adjust Status (Form I-485) by the applicant: The filing of a Form I-485 by a principal applicant in the United States does not satisfy the sought to acquire requirement for a derivative applicant. However, the filing of a Form I-485 by the applicant whose age is to be adjusted will satisfy the sought to acquire requirement, even if the application was later denied or abandoned, prompting the need to apply for a visa, or if the applicant opted to apply for an IV with the Department of State rather than apply to adjust status with USCIS.

1. In 2019 when your I-130 was approved, priority date was current and you filed I-485..What was reason for denial ? 2. In 2022 you interviewed with Montreal . Did you have contact ( send emails) to Montreal at least once a year . Look for 2023, 2024 . 3. Did you log into your CEAC account every year since 2022? 4.What you can do now is draft a Request To Reinstate due to Consulate/NVC error. Just put your timeline in order , state your CSPA claim back it up with copy of I-485 receipt notice and DS-260 confirmation as proof you sought to acquire benefit within one year of visa availability. 5. Send that to Montreal ( by email and post) , send it to NVC via Ask NVC and send it to LegalNet ( contact in link) ASAP https://fam.state.gov/fam/09FAM/09FAM010304.html

As there were no dates in your original post, I assumed everything happened more recently..so 2024. Since marriage lasted over a year, it may make annulment a little more challenging in family court. It should however give you some leverage in arguments to keep your position. Even most carefully planned / sound judgement marriages can fail .

You nailed it

In your withdrawal letter to USCIS, you do not have to go into details or allege fraud . Simple letter that you withdraw I-130 and I-864 as the marriage is not viable . Sign, notarize it and mail it original. You can upload a copy to your USCIS account ( for I-130), assuming you change password so she has no access to it. Who prepared the I-130 ? DIY or she has an attorney? If she is in removal ( Immigration Court) then there is no I-485 or I-864 yet. If you get annulment no immigration attorney can help her overcome the permanent bar, as it will be be based on fraud and all you have to do is raise the points you made on this thread . Getting a divorce/dissolution leaves her wiggle room to raise VAWA arguments as basis for end of this marriage. I know you are sharing from a vulnerable place , and I am an advocate for victims of domestic violence , plus a bleeding heart liberal …BUT experienced enough to tell you that details such ‘’pillow over her face ‘’ during intimate moments can be quickly be advanced by her as evidence that you abused her. I am speculating here, but I am inclined to think she will be filing a VAWA very quickly and that is the reason she left abruptly and cut contact….Stop texting her Again, what or how she figures out her immigration path will not affect you, even if she files and is successful with a VAWA, All you have to do is send out withdrawal and go to family court and start your annulment or dissolution.

Just need you to re-read your own words . Think about the planning and scheming required for her to get a ‘’friend ‘’ to chaperone marital visits….for a 40 year old virgin 😂 I am guessing she was scheming for church wedding cause getting married while in removal carries a bigger burden of bonafides . I would not blame you if you filed for annulment instead of dissolution…but know that USCIS would permanently bar her from getting a green card through another USC marriage.

In a sea of bad possible outcomes, such as heated arguments , public scandals in your congregation and potential police calls , her quietly going away is a blessing in disguise. Unlike you, she did not fall head over heels and was at least transparent enough to spell it out for you : she would only be a wife in ‘public’ , while in private treat living together as an amicable “arrangement “ with no intimacy. Stop texting her. Go file divorce, you can DIY with help of court legal aid clinic if you can’t afford an attorney. First, you show you tried serving her . Yes, they can serve her at work , process server can even carry a bouquet of flowers as decoy . If server can’t find her or she evades service, ask the judge to let you serve by publication . Easy and cheap. Just stay on top of process and move it along quickly. https://www.lawhelp.org/dc/resource/serving-divorce-papers-if-you-cant-locate-you

You write well, though I sense a bit of melancholic Woeth Me . I do not fault you for getting married TWO weeks after meeting her…you played your hand “ blind” , so to speak. You took a chance but wins are not guaranteed . I am glad you got a community cold shower here , telling you to take immediate action. TO DO: 1. Write a letter to USCIS to withdraw both I-130 and I-864 . Say the marriage is not viable and you are filing for divorce . State after the short time living as man and wife, you have concluded you are emotionally and physically incompatible. ..last sentence is optional, more a parting gift ,so her file has evidence this was a good faith marriage…as I am quite certain she will land on her feet and perhaps find another US husband. They will deny her I-485. What she does , where she goes is totally up to her. 2. You will not have problems in the future filing for another . Cheer up , listen to country songs and thank your lucky stars you were not supporting 3 kids and a mother in law like the fellow in bellow link trial😂

Poland allows police to open fire on migrants at the Belarusian border Published on : 2024/07/24 Polish MPs have approved a new measure which authorizes agents on the Belarusian border to fire live ammunition at migrants, for "self-defense" or in a "preventive manner." The law angered NGOs, who point to an already very tense situation in the area. On July 12, the Polish Parliament authorized security forces deployed on the Belarusian border - soldiers, border guards, police officers - to fire live ammunition "preventively" or in "self-defense" at anyone who attempts to cross the border irregularly. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/58618/poland-allows-police-to-open-fire-on-migrants-at-the-belarusian-border

If they simply reject , consider yourself self lucky. They will implement the practice of automatic NTA ( referral to court ) for all denials pretty soon. Find some organization or attorney to have on standby for help if needed. You can still DIY the I-130 as @appleblossom suggests. …

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Block on SF 2340, Iowa’s Anti-Immigrant Law ST. LOUIS, Mo. — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit today upheld a temporary block on SF 2340, Iowa's worst-ever immigration law. The Iowa law was passed during the 2024 Iowa legislative session and was temporarily blocked by the courts just weeks after. It conflicts with federal law and would have a number of dramatic consequences for Iowans. It creates new crimes for anyone in Iowa, including a child, who has reentered the country after being deported — even if that person is now authorized to be in the U.S. The appeals court agreed with the federal district court that the law is unconstitutional and that every part of the law should remain blocked while litigation continues. The court was considering two lawsuits asking that SF 2340 be declared unconstitutional and blocked. One was by the U.S. Department of Justice; the other was by the American Immigration Council, the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa, and the national ACLU on behalf of Iowa Migrant Movement for Justice and the thousands of immigrants that the organization assists, including two individual Iowans. Emma Winger, deputy legal director at the American Immigration Council, said, “Across the country right now, immigrant families are living in fear. Thankfully, for now, communities in Iowa don't have to worry about this cruel law, which would have subjected even some people living lawfully in the U.S. to arrest and deportation. Concerningly, states across the country are still working to pass harsh anti-immigrant laws that would completely upend the balance of power between states and the federal government in immigration enforcement. Empowering individual states to run our immigration laws is unconstitutional and throws our immigration system deeper into chaos." https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/federal-appeals-court-upholds-block-on-sf-2340-iowas-anti-immigrant-law

Interesting…I did not know there was public access in Texas for DL. Nice sleuthing work with the photos ….uploading here encouraged 😂

Why of course Dear Sir…with au naturel platinum highlights 😂 A dash younger than Madonna ( though likely as neurotic ) and if I may add , a slender Hillary doppelgänger flair😂

I have half a mind to get on a dating site myself , thanks to you😂. My headliner Woman With a Past Looking For Man With a Future!

Gosh , I guess like you they can “tell” just by looking 😂. …

1. No adoption needed. After you marry , you file I-485/1-130 for you and 16 year old 2. You must NOT quit job and must keep E-2 current even until AFTER your 18 year old secures a change of status to F-1 student ( for example). This child will NOT be able to be sponsored through marriage case because marriage will occur after his 18th birthday.

ICE loved Walmart parking lot sweeps. During first administration, my local store parking lot was “staffed” with agents stopping people for “ papeles/papers” . ‘Guess who they approached?

Radio silence is in keeping with nature of JC’s sign off: she is contacting the ex so that you may stew in jealousy. Script writes itself. Do not abort mission before getting Big Laugh Trophy …she is after all A Casino Indian😂! Tell her you have done many hours of research , made personal contact with the Oklahoma Modoc Tribe ( yes they own a small Casino) and they are ready to disburse Many $$ immediately. You have stumbled onto a Goldmine & hours of Entertainment .

To seed intrigue on anatomical location of photographed splatter ..😂 Red flags started the moment s/he asked to move chats to Zangi. 3 Alarm fire when she extracted info on location of away-from -home travel.

Very legitimate concern. What you do depends on where you happen to be and how they stop you. Read through your rights. Take a photo of your Natz Certificate or passport, save it in an email folder accessible on your phone . But first stand your ground . ‘If you have the stomach to do a social experiment, simply state you are a US Citizen and refuse to show proof. You will get released of course. https://immigrantjustice.org/know-your-rights/ice-encounter If you are pulled over in a traffic stop: Ask if the officer is from the police department or immigration. Immigration officers often identify themselves as “police,” but they are not police. Ask if they are from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CBP). If they are immigration officers, follow these guidelines about what information to provide. If you are a U.S. citizen or have lawful immigration status: Show your passport, legal permanent resident card, work permit, or other documentation of your status. If you are over the age of 18, you should carry your papers with you at all times. https://www.verifythis.com/article/news/verify/immigration/ice-churches-schools-hospitals-immigration-enforcement-under-trump/536-cfefc119-41d5-4384-b303-31989ad61eea Anyone, including ICE agents, can enter public areas of an organization without permission, according to the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) and Gelatt. Areas open to the public can include lobbies, waiting areas or parking lots, the NILC says. But that doesn’t mean ICE has the authority to stop, question or arrest just anyone who is in a public area, the NILC says. That still requires a warrant or probable cause to believe that the person does not have legal status in the United States. “Probable cause can be established through questioning of individuals who disclose their immigration status or documentation that indicates they are noncitizens,” the NILC says.

Nooooo! Could we keep her ? She has yet to try many charms and creative ploys on you. Play along. But , full speed ahead on searching for genuine adventures.

Upload here without fear of compromising her privacy. Between all of us Much Will Be Revealed . I am ( insert math plus many)% certain you are being Zangi-d by a s/he that is not the rubia of the photos.