Jump to content

Rocio0010

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,762

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Rocio0010

  1. Rocio0010
    Not sure I understand your question, but the title of the letter is “termination of conditional status”, although that’s not really relevant or truth because only an immigration judge can terminate her status. But the third bullet point / paragraph says “hereby denied”. Can you explain to me, based on your understanding, what’s “hereby denied”, if it’s not the 751?
  2. Rocio0010
    Enlighten me please, if it’s not denied, why does it say so in the letter?
  3. Rocio0010
    Then it’s strange that you still keep the faith on tier 1 officers? Have you told your mom about your situation? What advice has she given you?
  4. Rocio0010
    Coming here on a visitor visa with the preconceived intent to stay is fraud. As others have said, there are no shortcuts. It’s either the K1 or the CR1.
  5. Rocio0010
    First of all, congratulations for doing a good job and getting a fast approval. I am really happy for you. However, I do find it extremely unfair that USCIS does not follow an order when adjudicating petitions. Therefore, I think it’s unfair that people like me have to be waiting for almost a year with no end in sight. And of course, it’s even more unfair for folks like @mindthegap who have been in this awful limbo for close to 7 years. It’s very, very unfair since you also submitted stuff that wasn’t necessary, like passport page or the CR-1 visa. This is the second 751 that I’ve seen last month that was approved in a nanosecond. The other one was for an Ukrainian whose 751 was approved in (drumrolls) 22 days!!! That’s just unbelievable. I do have a theory, though. On 9/21/2022 USCIS released a memorandum of immediate help to people from countries with natural disasters . They listed the floods in Pakistan. Technically these expedites wouldnt affect residents because their status allows them to stay here. However, I do think that sometimes officers receiving 751s from these countries speed up on them because they don’t realize that these beneficiaries are already in the US. It’s the only explanation I can find for something so unfair.
  6. Rocio0010
    Wait, now I want to know and I don’t speak Russian, unfortunately! Im convinced original post in this thread is a troll
  7. Rocio0010
    Together with Terri’s case of the picture from the balcony!
  8. Rocio0010
    And another lesson to be learned is to keep a copy of everything you submit to DHS/ USCIS. There are no excuses for not keeping records, especially now with the availability of scanners and virtual clouds where everything can be accessed from literally anywhere.
  9. Rocio0010
    And even more amusing he’s more worried about the amount of petitions he can file.
  10. Rocio0010
    Well, you gave us zero information to work with. What embassy? And which visa?
  11. Rocio0010
    No. What triggered my reaction was “the possibility of bringing another fiancée “. This relationship is not over and you’re already thinking of the next one
  12. Rocio0010
    Again, multiple petitions by the same person might trigger them to think that you are gaining a profit with it. I don’t think they are against immigrants, but they are not going to go all out to help you. It’s your job to present them with your documentation. They are already backlogged as it is, can you imagine if they had to dig into 15 year old files to find something you were responsible to provide them with? No, that’s not how it works. And yes, withdrawing this application and submitting another k1 later on for a different person might raise red flags. Wait, why are you even thinking of applying for somebody else? How do you know there is going to be another romantic partner? And what makes you think that that person is also going to be from outside US?
  13. Rocio0010
    I’m sorry, but if you think that government institution will look into your own files (they are not their files, they are your files) you are very mistaken. It’s your job to connect the dots and fill out the blanks, not theirs. This is your application.
  14. Rocio0010
    Go into “community discussions”, scroll down until you find the regional forums, look for Russia, Ukraine, Belarus subforum and ask there
  15. Rocio0010
    Oh no, my friend, that’s not how USCIS works. They are not going to dig into your file/s. You’re asking too much. That’s your job.
  16. Rocio0010
    Good idea. I would also post in the Russian forum, if there is one. Maybe somebody else went through something similar in terms of language barrier
  17. Rocio0010
    Yes, it does help some… I mean, 15 years ago it’s not so long ago and most files were already digital, so there has to be a record!
  18. Rocio0010
    I see. I will ask again, are you a USC by birth? Without going into details, where did this situation take place? Meh, I am not so sure to be honest. I mean, I think USCIS is not necessarily against “my side”, or immigrants’ side or on the other side, whatever that is. I just think they are backlogged and many a times officers are not properly trained with certain cases or in certain aspects of immigration law. VJ is a DIY site so not sure ppl would agree with you. There are some instances in which we recommend to get an attorney. I am of the idea that not even the most expensive, most professional attorney cares as much about your case as you, so I will always support DIYing your case if you know what you’re doing. But I digress from your original question.
  19. Rocio0010
    Are you a USC by birth? Where did this issue happen?
  20. Rocio0010
    Then that backs up my point that it is, actually, a huge issue. If it wasn’t a huge issue, who and why would they use the conversation against you? Just because it wasn’t an issue back then, it doesn’t mean it would be an issue now, or viceversa. Different officers, different immigration rules (think of Adam Walsh Act) and different administration in both countries.
  21. Rocio0010
    If it wasn’t “a huge issue” USCIS wouldn’t be issuing a RFE. To give you an example, in my AOS I completely forgot to send two passport pictures for my I-765 form, but because I did send some passport pictures for my I-485, that wasn’t a huge issue and it was something they could figure out themselves. Yours seems to be an issue, otherwise a) they wouldn’t have RFEd you and b) you’d be pretty open about it here. Again, to me, you’re focusing on the wrong issue. And if you don’t address it, a CR1 will not help you either
  22. Rocio0010
    Boy, this is so confusing! I believe I read all the posts. No, there’s not a cap. It’s not like they are going to tell you “no, you’re on application #5, you’ve used up all your chances, you’re out”. This is not like Mario Bros. That being said, USCIS or DHS might red flag your file if they notice that you’re constantly applying for immigrants. The number 5 they gave you is the record for an OP in VJ. I believe you’re worried about the wrong issue here. The issue is not (so far) the number of times you’ve filed. The issue is what they’ve found on your background check, which you think is not serious, but USCIS doesn’t agree with you. It’s hard to help you without knowing what it is… so, what is this thing from your past ?
  23. Rocio0010
    Nobody can tell you for sure until you tell us what you submitted.
  24. Rocio0010
    It doesn’t really matter
  25. Rocio0010
    The difference is that -apparently- Tim and his Indonesian fiancé did not plan to get married when she applied for a B1/B2, or at any point before she entered the US. From what you are saying (I haven’t read the thread, or if I did I don’t remember if), the Chinese guy and her girlfriend had already planned to skip the line by misrepresenting herself when she was asked about the purpose of her visit. 100% she said that the purpose of her visit was to spend ser x, x and x, instead of saying “oh, I’m here because I am getting married and I’m planning on staying!”
×
×
  • Create New...