-
Posts
1,479 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by Fe.Ta
-
I-751 Cover Letter and evidences
Fe.Ta replied to Jillyg92's topic in Removing Conditions on Residency General Discussion
This seems like solid evidence. Copies of both passports are not needed. But, you might have reasons not listed on here as to why. -
Certified translator and costs
Fe.Ta replied to N30's topic in K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedures
We used this when we were going the K1 route. https://www.daytranslations.com/free-translation-online/ We actually used the paid services, I can't recall how much they were. Also, it has been 4-5 years since we used them. I know people that have translated them themselves. I could have done my husband's paperwork, but we got the apostille and certification over in Argentina, and I wanted to make sure everything was certified including the translation. If you have criminal records to translate, it is better to just use some type of service rather than a DIY just to be safe, especially if you are going through the Ecuador (Guayaquil) embassy, which is one of the toughest from what I have heard. -
Thank you! I have no idea why this did not notify me of responses. That's what I figured as well. Like it sounds too good to be true. Keep me posted. Hope the buddy does well.
-
I - 751 January 2022 Filers
Fe.Ta replied to Sarge2155's topic in Removing Conditions on Residency General Discussion
No, it does not. It is definitely a personal preference. Many people do it quarterly. The idea is just to show you have them for the longevity of your marriage - if possible. If you have other strong evidence (which you should), sending quarterly statements should also be plenty. -
@DesperateHouseWif Good luck tomorrow. Let us know how it goes!
- 17 replies
-
NVC questions about AOS [split & merged threads]
Fe.Ta replied to tomas2243's topic in National Visa Center (Dept of State)
Hi! Welcome! First of all, I am not too savvy in the CR1 process. Thus, I will also let others chime in to be a bit more helpful. But, this is what I know: Your yearly income would just be whatever you would expect to earn within a year, not what you would earn within the time left in 2023. You can only provide what you have. None of us can tell you if something is enough or not, since this is at the discretion of the officer. Be prepared, however, to have to present whatever you have available for proof of income within the last 3 years (pay stubs, income tax returns, W2s, 1099, etc.) I don't think it is a problem per-say. But, they might require you to have a co-sponsor who has an income that has been more steady (i.e. same job and income within a few years of longevity). I believe you can only use this as support if: The appraisal was performed by what they considered a legitimate appraiser. It can be converted into cash quickly within a year. It does not cause a negative impact on the household when sold. Thus, it is not the primary household. In other words, if that is where your family lives, the officer could choose to say it cannot be used to show sponsorship because selling it would mean your household would be left without a place to live. In my humble opinion, it might be best if you just get a co-sponsor from the get-go just because it appears you are lacking enough to prove consistency of income (and total amount of 125% above poverty line) to be the sole sponsor. The CR1 takes about two years, which means you are looking at 2025, and there is a potential that a new administration will be in government. Hence, requirements can change and be more strict. By not getting a co-sponsor now, you could further delay the wait if they decide to do an RFE (or denial) for a co-sponsor later. -
So many changes... What happened?
Fe.Ta replied to Crazy Cat's topic in Site-Related Discussion - Updates, Ideas, etc.
Go to your username in the upper, right-hand corner, then User Settings, finally, go to Security and Privacy. Authenticate with password, then it will let you do your status as "hidden". -
281 days for us and we also have not received any of that - except the 28-month extension letter. This is extremely "normal" for Potomac - the center of deceased cases.
- 1,290 replies
-
- potomac
- potomac 2019
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Did you provide your passport information? I do not recall the form asking for passport information. I just took another peek at the 751 form and I don't see that being a field nor is it part of the evidence required. But, if you did provide it with the 751, one way or another, I would also like to know what others say for future reference.
-
ATL (Atlanta) is also pretty bad with just being busy and not efficient overall - even when you are flying within USA. For all airports, it definitely depends on the day, the time, and whatever the officers decide to do. I would say err on the side of caution and give yourself plenty of time by assuming it will take the "worst case scenario" time in immigration and consider overall security delays and weather.
-
If you are still married to your USC spouse, it is 3 years from the issued date on your original 2-yr conditional GC, and you meet the other N400 criteria. Then, yes, you are eligible. Example: If you got your 2-yr conditional GC with an issued date of October 15, 2019. Then, you became eligible to file for citizenship N400 under the marriage-based 3-yr rule on July 15, 2022 (the window opens 90 days prior to apply) - even if you had a pending Removal of Conditions 751. At this point, if you meet all the applicable criteria, and your 751 was already approved as well, you can move forward with the N400. Please see the following for additional information: https://www.uscis.gov/n-400 Also, yes, 751 normally do not have interviews unless A) you have red flags or a complicated case B) you have a combo interview because you filed an N400 while the 751 is pending.
-
Just pointing out things about immigration here: You will have an interview, regardless, and you will be scrutinized more for it being your second marriage to an international woman. Additionally, when they see that the wedding took place prior to the actual requirement of meeting in person, that might also be considered a red flag - not to mention other factors like your age gap, how long you have been together, etc. While some embassies/consulates/offices/service centers across the whole immigration journey move faster than others, in today's world, the difference between them are smaller than they used to, so for a CR1, it will still be around two years (you are looking at 2025) no matter which consulate or embassy gets your case. If you have personal reasons for wanting/needing to be together in USA prior to the end of the year, you will need to adjust your expectations and consider other options that are not in the USA and DO NOT involve immigration fraud. Best of luck and I hope it works out!
-
I am putting this in off topic because it has nothing to do with immigration. But, I figured this is the biggest pool to ask for opinions regarding pet insurance. I am trying to see which pet insurance is the best in covering preventative, accidents, out of pocket, etc. I did a little research and each website gives me something different. So, I figured I would ask in case some of you have first-hand experience. Mainly, I just want something that will get my dog covered. I don't mind waiting a couple of months or any waiting period before I can take him in. I just want to make sure I get one and pay for it so I can take him for his routine. I am just tired of paying $300-$400 at once when I take him to the yearly visits. I'd rather have something I pay monthly and will cover the yearly trip and any accidental or unforeseen events. Thanks!
-
EXCEPT, LEGALLY, they have a responsibility, which they are not fulfilling. Per 8 USC CHAPTER 13, they should be processing cases within 180 days. They selected the newer cases to appear as if they are now achieving that, yet per a bunch of documents, it has always been "first come, first serve" in their policies. Thus, it is an illusion because anything that HAS BEEN FILED PRIOR TO March 2023 is just going to get stuck there it is not going to be processed within 180 and it will not be processed in a "first come, first serve" basis. While we know there are plenty of excuses and things that affect this being a reality (and I sure are heck am not going to be getting into politics), they are CHOOSING the most convenient way for them to "achieve this". So, as @Crazy Cat said, it is the fact that they are doing this to skew the numbers and statistics to appears as if they are fulfilling/complying with this (they got in trouble back in 2022 I believe because of how many WOM were sent and government was pushing). Thus, for us older cases that have been waiting for a while is just the BS that they are AGAIN not doing their jobs like they are supposed to. We are not wanting to find an explanation for it, of course USCIS will do whatever the heck they want, we are just pointing out the fact that this is FLAT OUT WRONG. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title8/chapter13/subchapter2&edition=prelim#:~:text=It is the sense of,days after the filing of Also, I can't speak for others, as I know some people can get pretty toxic. But, from my end (and Crazy Cat as well), we are excited for all the new approvals. I would never take away someone's happiness and this forum has always been rooting for one another - regardless who gets approved first, etc. This thread is just us "older" users venting about USCIS - not against people getting approved. He/she also went as Jacobo at some point. Apparently, changed from Colombia to Costa Rica too?