Jump to content

Mike E

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,794

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    104

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mike E

  1. Mike E
    If she is seeking an IR-1 visa from an approved I-130, then DS-160 is not the correct form. Depends on the reason for the arrest. You have not described anything (yet) that would make her inadmissible for an immigration visa.
  2. Mike E
    Lots of authorities of lots of countries issue lots of documents that are neither the documents nor the authorities the U.S. department of state asks for. Obtain the document that the link I gave you asks for.
  3. Mike E
    No such thing in Jordan according to https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country/Jordan.html
  4. Mike E
    Her overstays in other countries are not relevant to her application for an immigration visa to the U.S.
  5. Mike E
    I see no purpose in that.
  6. Mike E
    The IR-2 needs her own I-864
  7. Mike E

    Green Card Delivery

    Mike E replied to PM Hank's topic in Canada

    Did you pay your immigrant fee to get your green card. If so, it is a bit early to worry about it arriving. With your SS card and your stamped visa, you have what you need to get state ID / DL. With state ID / DL and your SS card you can get a job without I-9 reverification.
  8. Mike E
    Correct at interview
  9. Mike E
    Fiancee visa is high risk for you because: * warden has to approve marriage ceremony before you can file I-485 * With I-485, there can be an interview requiring his presence. So the only option is IR-1 (not CR-1, because that requires I-751 and possibly an interview requiring his presence). So if you want to DIY this, get married (if warden lets you), and he files I-130. Maybe it gets approved. If so you move on to NVC and consular to get an IR-1 visa. Your challenge is demonstrating bonafide relationship with an imprisoned spouse. Once you will not able to live with for decades.
  10. Mike E
    What is his criminal record?
  11. Mike E
    EB-2 is an immigration visa. Once OP enters on the EB-2, OP is an LPR
  12. Mike E
    Indeed, @Family
  13. Mike E
    I am sure there are employees of Utah County who understand. However they are bound by the laws passed by the people of Utah, a sovereign republic.
  14. Mike E
    OP and you are confused about what a meeting, and/or you think I am a pre-internet fossil.
  15. Mike E
    Utah County will not report your marriage to Morocco. However, with few exceptions, marriages are a matter of public record in the U.S.
  16. Mike E
    None of which carries any weight in U.S. immigration law. (By all means start a topic in a relevant forum on visajourney if you want to debate antiquated INA.)
  17. Mike E
    no you wrote: one meeting in 4 years is not a lot. It is you who needs to read your answers. Without meeting more you are not getting a visa.
  18. Mike E
    Nobody meets online. A meeting has occurred between 2 people, when they are in close enough physical proximity to perceive and converse with each other. OP has not been dating for 5 years. There is scant evidence of bonafide relationship. The prospects for fiance(e) or spousal visa are grim until there have been more meetings.
  19. Mike E
    That is not dating. I cannot speak to your personal safety if you pursue a relationship in Morocco that is illegal in Morocco.
  20. Mike E
    Where?
  21. Mike E
    Dangerous. You can lock his CSPA age in at under 21, so that when he does pursue his visa, even if he is 21 or older, he will still be processed as a child of a U.S. citizen (2 year wait) versus an adult son of U.S. citizen (10 year wait). File his I-130 now and pay the fee before it goes up.
  22. Mike E
    https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1101&num=0&edition=prelim “33) The term "residence" means the place of general abode; the place of general abode of a person means his principal, actual dwelling place in fact, without regard to intent.” She in fact is not actually dwelling in IL for the past 3 months. Not even a day. If she spent the majority her 3 months in IL, easy case: she has been an IL resident. If she even spent a plurality of her days in IL, easy case, still an IL resident. Of course not. That isn’t the issue here. The issue here is an LPR who does not live in the U.S. or IL who wants to naturalize.
  23. Mike E
    What about the refund?
  24. Mike E
    She is not sleeping in IL these past 3 months. She is not living in IL. Did she have any single absences of over 180 days at her last interview? When people spent 181 or more consecutive days outside the U.S., as per https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/attachments.pdf she needs evidence she did not intend to break continuous residency. Tax returns, lease, something. I do not believe she is qualified to file N-400.
  25. Mike E
    You do not need to inform USCIS about your new passport. It benefits no one.
×
×
  • Create New...