Mike E

You mean paper and pencil? IME that’s a fast path to errors and letters from the IRS. try freetaxusa.com

13. Provide all of the information requested in the table below about the beneficiary, all of the beneficiary's dependents, and any other individuals the beneficiary financially supports (do not include any individuals named in Part 3.). Relationship to the Beneficiary (Type or print "Self" if you are filing for yourself as the beneficiary or "Beneficiary" if someone is agreeing to support you in Part 3.) So back to your original question: Child Item numbers and page numbers please.

says: I-864 - Affidavit of Support: K-2's don't require their own separate I-864 with supporting documents (tax returns, etc). Make sure they are listed in section 9 of the K-1's I-864, and provide a photocopy of the K-1's I-864 with the K2's paperwork. You don't need to include copies of the supporting documents with the K-2's paperwork. You won't get an RFE if you do happen to provide a separate I-864 with supporting docs for the K-2. It's just not required.

Varies by consulate. Some will RFE. I would inform the consulate now and advise them you will need the approved I-129F extended until you get the police certificate.

I never said thread or post You are working on ds-160. That means you filled out I-129F and it was approved. A question is asked about where the in the US the beneficiary intends to live. So what was the answer?

From the N-600K instructions: The processing includes: interview of the applicant and qualifying relative (parent or grandparent) or guardian (if applicable), My suggestion is that you study the instructions.

183 days in any rolling 365 day period, at minimum

A similar question was asked on I-129F. What was your answer?

Droll

What does say?

I am not seeing anything that relates to children in Part 2 in https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-134.pdf What page number and item number are you seeing this? Item number and page number? She is your dependent and must be listed in page 6, item 14. The beneficiary as in your future spouse? That person is not a dependent.

Seems less about Ford’s confidence or lack of confidence in EV efficiency (see topic title) and more about Congress’s national security concerns about Chinese involvement in what is seen by politicians as a core technology to America’s future.

Yes the Jay Treaty. Given that, assuming she marries him, she can get a GC through him. Unfortunately there is no derivative / follow-to-join feature with Jay, as there is with EB-3. So she would have to wait for him to get LPR status and file an F2A petition. The wait times on F2A are ugly these days. Once he became a U.S. citizen, he can use mandamus to force things along. About 7 years end to end.

It is unlikely to be automatically canceled. The U.S. government has discretion to do so. It is by invitation only so far. To have any hope of getting it, you need to file I-130. And what it is is a parole. It is not a GC. You are allowed to enter the us while waiting I-130 be approved. While you can file I-485 after I-130 is approved, it is not clear to me that you can immediately I-485 before I-130 is approved as is the case when one enters the U.S. on a non immigrant visa. https://www.uscis.gov/FRP https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/invitations-to-be-issued-for-family-reunification-parole-process You should not get your hopes up.

I-129F is low priority to modernize

Depends on your state of residence. Try registering online with a scan of your certificate.

Futile IME

It would have been had you not told the CBP officer officer something that was not true:

If the REP is ultimately denied, she can be out up to 180 days per journey. If denied, she needs to immediately return to the U.S. If REP is ultimately approved, she is not subject to the 180 day rule. She must return to the U.S. before REP expires. There are plenty who leave the U.S. thinking it will be for less than 180 days. Then something happens, such as border closure, personal medical issues, family medical issues, etc. And then they stay too long. Of the few that attempt a return, most are permitted as returning residents. But it seems 1 percent get unlucky and get an NTA, especially in cases where CBP knows the arriving alien cannot easily adjust status.

Well that was a detail missing that I either missed or you did not mention. Now your OP no longer confuses me.

LPR status is for living in the U.S. Going to school in Calgary is not living in the U.S. Some CBP officers at ports of entry carve out an exception for students abroad. I would love it if they would show which section of INA says that. Your proposal carries risk. My role as a contributor to this forum is to give suggestions to zero out the risk.

If you apply for a B visa and are denied, you will be forever denied an ESTA / visa waiver privilege. Simply not worth the risk.

She faces a seemingly tough choice. While the risk of being put into removal proceedings is small, it is not zero. Presumably withdrawing from her current school term might derail her degree. On an immigration forum, which this is, my bias is to give up on the Canadian degree (if necessary) to zero out the risk to her LPR status. And VJ’s terms and conditions would not permit me to say otherwise. If this were a personal finance forum: * in the long run, she is better off in the U.S. - lower costs and higher total compensation * as British and Canadian educated person, she will breeze through university in the U.S. Some of her Canadian university course credit will transfer, and she can test out of some other courses. The sunk cost fallacy should not exercise any influence on her.

Under 50 percent. When will you have a Schengen Area passport?

1. When does her U.S. immigration visa expire? 2. When do her classes finish?