Mike E

It is not that simple

Varies according to the whims of the consulate.

Those articles are wrong

The father provides ecidence that he, in writing, * acknowledges the child as his * agrees to provide financial support for thr child If the father does so, and successfully pursues a CRBA for the child, great. Get married before your child is born.

Your residence is state 2 and that is likely where your interview will be. None of the above.

Time wise it is taking a 3-4 day weekend, get married, file I-130. Legitimation of children born out of wedlock is the problem. It can be over come, but what I see too often is that it falls to kids decades later to prove that Legitimation happened. The priority of needs is: 1. kids 2. adult immigrants 3. petitioners If she earns 40 social security credits you are off hook.

The U.S. cannot force the RCMP to provide a document in the form the U.S. demands. At any given time, there is out of date information in https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country.html I believe what you received will be fine. The title of your document matches what the Canada entry in the above link says: "Certified Criminal Record Check – Type of Criminal Record Check for Personal Use: Other / RCMP National Repository Entire Holdings" If the CO rejects a certificate that has your photo and fingerprints, then that CO is putting America at risk. The CO should be happy it has your photo and fingerprints as these are easy to verify. Instead I interpret: "Special Seal(s) / Color / Format: The requested document is fingerprint-based, but the report does not include an image of the applicant or the applicant’s fingerprints." to mean "You [the CO] cannot reject an RCMP police certificate if it lacks fingerprints and/or photo" If the CO thinks your certificate thinks the certificate is fake, ask the CO to check with an ARSO or FSN Investigator : https://www.state.gov/serves-as-the-u-s-embassys-law-enforcement-liaison-to-the-host-nation http://theconsulsfiles.blogspot.com/2011/02/bienvenue-enfants.html?m=1

There is not. I would not worry about it. I would provide a stable mailing address for N-400. If you were her I-864 sponsor, you need to file I-865 after she moves.

This gets reported each day I think. You are fine.

Yes

Since I-129F is not approved, you cannot submit DS-160

Her current name is her current legal name. Anything else is perjury and trouble. Her name that she currently used os listed in the “other names beneficiary has used” Once case moves to the consulate, she will need to show the consulate originals of every lawful change of name document. Her current legal name at the time of her interview will need to match the name on her passport. And the same will be true when she files I-485. She will need originals for I-485 too.

Case will stay closed because it is approved. This is normal. It does not always get closed the same day as approved. If DoS sends case back to USCIS, it will be re-opened

NVC or consulate might require the 14 year old be counted in your household when you prepare I-864 since technically he is a dependent

The child cannot be born in U.S. then. First principle is to protect the child. That means marrying before the child is born so that the child has an easier path to U.S. citizenship. Presumably through CRBA, but if necessary, through IR-2. Out of wedlock births to non gestational U.S. citizen parents sometimes produce a nightmare for the child. So K-1 is out. I am normally a Utah zoom advocate, but it takes 2 years to get a CR-1 visa. So follow the Thai process to get married, since the child will be in Thailand for at least 18 months, and you want to be certain the marriage is recognized under Thai law. Especially if the CR-1 is denied or goes into extended processing. Fewer than 5 K-3 visas are issued per year. You can try, but you will have better luck playing slots in a casino. When Congress established K-1 and K-3, the intent was these would be fast turn around visas, end to end 90 days usually. So K-3 was superior to CR-1 and K-1. Over time, USCIS and DoS corrupted the intent of Congress to make K-3 take as long as CR-1, and then did the same with K-1. Indeed K-1 now takes longer than CR-1. CR-1 is the superior visa, and your wife should wait until your 2 year marriage anniversary to enter on her CR-1 visa.

You need to get a better grasp of the process. https://www.visajourney.com/guides/k1-fiance-visa-flowchart/ is a good place to start. I-129F is filed with USCIS. If approved, you then move onto the Department of State to get a K-1 visa. That requires DS-160.

Who is pregnant? The U.S. citizen or the non-citizen?

I would asked to take oath right then in my old name.

Was I-130 approved?

I-129F or DS-160?

(Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? (Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? (Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? (Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? (Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? (Black hole sun, black hole sun) Won't you come? Won't you come?

Always

Double how many years the between today and final action date and add 3 years

They are not permitted to re-verify a GC that was not expired at the time. If they do fire you for having an expired GC, meet with an employment lawyer. A lawyer will gladly take this case on contingency. A 6 month severance payout should be easy to get. I would love to be fired over this.

Chatgpt gives better answers than EMMA live reps.