Mike E

1. Just spouse and children 2. Marriage cert is proof of name change 3. my opinion is use paper form

Per https://www.uscis.gov/i-130 you are fine. That is good. Better than a passport good Checklist does not list this. She will need passport and birth certificate for her visa process later, after I-130 is approved.

These cases stretch the intellects of * NVC, usually * COs, sometimes Your AGI, while above the I-864p threshold, is less than $3000 over, so if the CO goes by that, you might be asked for a joint sponsor.

W-2 or self employed / 1099?

I wish she would ban dark roots.

I have yet to find a working cspa calculator

My word. Baptist, Catholic, Greek Orthodox, and Jewish. Surprised he isn’t Wahhabi too.

I would not. I am certain NVC will warn you that you do not meet the requirements. The CO makes the final decision though. Your evidence is good.

If you have a willing joint sponsor, have that I-864 ready to show at the interview

You posted a screen shot saying their SLO is 3 months. Has been 3 or more months?

If you have the I-129F approval letter, the expiration is listed.

It means they are doing nothing. They spent more energy responding to your Congress person than sending the case to NVC. But they really do not like spending energy defending a WoM. I think it has come to that. When do you think it come to that?

Yes. Yes, as early as November 1, 2023. There have been cases where it is current when interview scheduled, and then by the time there is an interview, it is not current. And so the visa is not issued until a visa number is available. There is evidence that DoS distorts the final action chart so that despite being current, there is actually no visa number available. This seems to be the case for the Philippines. I think you will get an interview before November 1, 2026. As noted 2 times by me before, that is not supposed to happen, given you sought to acquire a visa when you were current and your CSPA age was under 21. If I were you, I would inform NVC today you will be current on October 1, 2023, and so again on October 1, 2023. And do this each time a visa bulletin comes out that shows you as current.

summoned or summons “The aforementioned investigation was discontinued” Not arrested, charged, indicted Ok. That took way too long and too many posts. @pushbrk did ask for the original term in her language.

Yeah, that did not happen. The nursing shortage will not end: * EB-3 will be overwhelmed by nurses * EB-2 will get pressure from EB-3 to EB-2 upgraders. Tech and some nurses with masters degrees * EB-1 will get pressure from EB-2 to EB-1 upgraders. * more people subject to country limits for EB will find love with RoW folks, and change their country of charge-ability, thus putting pressure on RoW. 10 years is realistic.

Sounds like you need to live with your spouse before trying again.

“Charge” has a very specific legal meaning in the 5 major countries where English is the dominant language. While the word her language might translate to “charge”, she was not charged by U.S. legal standards. To be charged a prosecutor would need to be involved.

The term, in English “charge” was used in both letters?

She was not arrested. Based on what you have written, she was not charged either. Being questioned by a police officer is not being charged. By all means, get the required criminal records for the country where she was living in when this happened to see what is there. Go to https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/Visa-Reciprocity-and-Civil-Documents-by-Country.html if what is there says she was arrested or charged, get it fixed. If she answers yes to something that did not happen, there can be bad outcomes.

What question?

When does the I-129F petition expire?

Even people whose beneficiary has never been to the U.S.? For people whose beneficiary is still in the U.S., the screen makes sense. For you it makes no sense. So paper file, as PDF I-130 is designed correctly. As a computer programmer, when I encounter software this faulty, I refuse to use it, because the ice berg rule applies.

Never have needed my GC to see a doctor or buy groceries nor would I agree to do that

Her answers to 1 and 2 were correct. No need to worry. Why do you think has to be disclosed to the embassy?