Jump to content

Mike E

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,794

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    104

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mike E

  1. Mike E
    Legally they have 120 days from the date the RFE response was received.
  2. Mike E
    Even U.S. citizens get denied entry at pre clearance stations. The reason is mostly because of https://www.cbp.gov/document/guides/carrier-information-guide-english In that document, CBP lists the documents citizens, LPRs, and aliens must use to fly to the U.S. OP does not possess a valid document. So only a port of entry on U.S. soil works.
  3. Mike E
    Congratulations. I am in shock. What port of entry will you use?
  4. Mike E
    No that did not happen. Your timeline is a mess, but from you post history it seems you did file I-751, it was approved, and your 10 year gc was never received. If so, your best move here is to: * File I-90 * fly to Canada or Mexico * walk to the border * present your I-90 receipt, I-751 approval * and expect a long day at the port of entry, and an I-193 fee. But you will be admitted. SB-1 will not be approved If I-751 was not approved, then it is IR-1 for you. Do even bother with I-407.
  5. Mike E
    Legally it has to let you in on ports of entry on U.S. soil
  6. Mike E
    Only an immigration judge can revoke your gc. What CBP can is seize your gc, give to Notice to Appear, and give you an I-551 stamp.
  7. Mike E
    no Huh? You need (5 * 365 + 2) / 2 = 914 days of physical presence in the U.S. in the past 5 years or since “resident since”, which ever is more recent.
  8. Mike E
    https://www.visajourney.com/reviews/index.php?cnty=Senegal
  9. Mike E
    Wasn’t there an RFE before the denial?
  10. Mike E
    That is exactly the opposite of what I wrote
  11. Mike E
    The best outcome I can foresee: “Plaintiff has not been examined your honor; there can be no de novo review” Judge: “Agreed unfortunately but your agency is foot dragging.” Judge to plaintiff’s lawyer: “Why didn’t you file an APA suit?” And OP will be down $10,000. I am out. Good luck OP.
  12. Mike E
    Cool. For her SS card, SSA policy is only first name and last name matter. So use just those two names for her SSN application so that her SS card does not turn into a mess.
  13. Mike E
    More likely than an APA suit? Nope
  14. Mike E
    Bring corrections to interview
  15. Mike E
    No examination was conducted. If your interpretation of the law was correct, then the courts would have entertained thousands of de novo cases where the candidate showed up, only to find the field office closed without notice due to covid. But I am game, lets see the DIY advice for a de novo review and then lets see the results of the trial.
  16. Mike E
    And did not recite the “oath of the applicant for naturalization”. So no 120 day clock. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1446&num=0&edition=prelim https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?hl=false&edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title8-section1447&num=0&saved=|Z3JhbnVsZWlkOlVTQy1wcmVsaW0tdGl0bGU4LXNlY3Rpb24xNDQ2|||0|false|prelim
  17. Mike E
    So no interview. De novo is out because the law requires an interview. I believe WoM is out because WoM is a demand for a decision, and there can be no decision without an interview. That would leave APA, but my understanding is: * All administrative processes have to be exhausted before a judge would rule for the plaintiff * All administrative processes have not been exhausted because OP has not tried CIS ombudsman * the crowd here is saying to not try CIS ombudsman
  18. Mike E
    No it will not. There are countless free tools for doing this
  19. Mike E
    Which will likely take more than 90 days to be approved. I suspect it has been over 10 years since anyone on VJ got those. In the golden era, CBP could grant work authorization at POE. VJ timelines even have a field for that.
  20. Mike E
    https://www.ilcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Sample-2.pdf OP is now saying that there was no interview. So my understanding is de novo review is out for now. WoM + APA after ombudsman is the correct action.
  21. Mike E
    Delete
  22. Mike E
    She can correct this when she files DS-160 and at the interview. * her name on her birth certificate must match the name on her passport. She should fix this now if they do not match * the name on her visa will match that of her passport * i would have used her first personal name as her U.S. first name, and her 2nd and 3rd personal names as her middle name
  23. Mike E
    False She is unemployed
  24. Mike E
    “serially convicted child rapist” Let me fix that for you: ”minor-attracted person”
  25. Mike E
    Let’s see it
×
×
  • Create New...