Mike E

no. Just write a letter stating you want to amend your answer(s) I see no issue if you cure all this before your interview.

Possibly. Try getting a new ESTA and see. Is your petitioner still alive and/or (if applicable) still your spouse?

Ok, I think you need to fike an amendment to your N-400 and an IRS tax return for that year

Ok cool. I was counting foreign earned income as self employment income subject to 15.3 percent SE tax, but I would also credit the unseen employer contribution of CPP tax since that is a tax that depresses wages of T-4 jobs in Canada as the SS employer contribution for W-2 jobs does in the US So maybe it washes out at $20K USD.

So just how did you get to enjoy this 2 year card before it expired?

Did he at least wait until POE to divorce?

Great. If you get a run around, post a reply to this topic, and I am certain me or someone else will be able to coach you through it.

It does not. Filing I-751 interviews with I-90 because: * USCIS has decided it will interfere. The published instructions for I-90 and/or I-751 say so * USCIS is not interested in producing a green card that is expired at time of production or delivery. Given current I-90 processing times, on average that is exactly what would happen. So while the advice to have OP file I-90 is all well and good, compliant with VJ T&C, etc, it is an exercise in futility on average. And OP continuing to ignore advice to file I-90 and instead engaging with tier 1 USCIS officers is simply brilliant because arguably OP has the right to confirm with USCIS what the correct process is. The clock is going to run out and OP will keep the 10 year GC. And did the I-90 produce a new GC in hand?

Agreed you can file, provided you did not enter with the intent to do so. You do however face a decade of stressful EAD and AP renewals. Since March 2020, the final action date has progressed 12 months. 2023 - 2020 = 3 3 * 12 + 10-3 = 43 Assuming your PD is 2 years behind the current final action date and allowing a year for USCIS to process the approval, you are looking at a wait of: 43/12 * 2 + 1 = 8 years at least to wait in the U.S. Given how long F2B has been frozen, I fear it is more like 20 years.

I would list the current address of the Iranian Air Force’s head quarters for all 22 years

If you are not living there, that isn’t your address. Either wait to file the forms or use a stable mailing address of a friend or relative.

SSDI and SSDI is permitted income for I-134 and I-864 VJ members in your situation addressed this by printing their award letters from VA and SSA.

After a former ISO did an q&a on reddit last year, my new conclusion ( ) is there is only upside assuming you correctly upload. There is no downside, even if you incorrectly upload. The same is true if you decide to mail the evidence.

OTHER

If you truly mean SSI, https://www.ssa.gov/ssi , that income cannot be used for I-134 and I-864

For K-1 / I-134, 100 percent For I-485 / I-864, 125 percent

Did they?

Without Congress taking action, it will never be current again.

Yes that is the number for I-864 for a house hold of 2 at 125 pct of HHS $19,720 is the number for I-134 for a house hold of 2 at 100 pct of HHS

Yeah social security taxes are shockingly high compared to CPP, so at that income level, Canada has lower taxes and so the IRS foreign income tax credit does not help you. So how did you answer these? Have you EVER not filed a Federal, state, or local tax return since you became a lawful permanent resident? If you answered "Yes," did you consider yourself to be a "non-U.S. resident"? Have you called yourself a "non-U.S. resident" on a Federal, state, or local tax return since you became a lawful permanent resident? ?

Pls show a screenshot of the actual question

It is based on HHS poverty limits. These change year. For K-1 it 100 percent of HHS. For CR-1, I-864 125 percent. When the K-1 enters the U.S. , I-485 / I-864 moves to 125 percent. It is best to use 125 percent because IMO, few K-1 petitioners can magically increase their income by 25 percent when their betrothed moves to U.S.

i-864a is described by USCIS as follows: Use this form if you are a household member and want to promise to make your income and/or assets available to help support a sponsored immigrant If you, the joint sponsor, and/or the co-sponsor of the joint are unwilling to provide the co-sponsor’s W-2s, then I am baffled how the co-sponsor is fulfilling the promise to make the co-sponsor’s income available to support the beneficiary. I expect it will baffle NVC (which tends to be more baffled more often than me) and maybe the CO.

And prior to that, USCIS claimed to roll out an ADIT by mail system ( https://www.uscis.gov/newsroom/alerts/uscis-announces-additional-mail-delivery-process-for-receiving-adit-stamp ), which did not last long because USCIS stopped answering phones. So USCIS rolled out an efficient process and terminated it in favor of an inefficient process. Probably because the efficient process was too costly. OP needs an ADIT. But the expectations of getting one without a WoM ( https://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/799745-how-to-file-a-mandamus-in-federal-court/ ) are low

Did the joint sponsor and joint sponsor’s co-sponsor file a joint tax return? If so, expect to provide the complete tax return, including all W-2s