Jump to content

nastra30

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,217

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nastra30

  1. nastra30
    Just answer any questions truthfully, but don't volunteer any information if they don't ask.
  2. nastra30
    Are the parents citizens?
  3. nastra30
    NVC will send the info to anybody whose email is in CEAC regardless of whether you petitioner or beneficiary. You can have multiple emails in CEAC.
  4. nastra30
    He WILL lose.
  5. nastra30
    It's not automatic. You'll still have to petition the child again using form I-129F for K4 visa, and has to go through USCIS again for approval. Anyway, K4s are not readily been issued anymore, once the I-130 is approved USCIS will admistratively close the I-129F.
  6. nastra30
    Yes, you don't have to file separately if you and your husband continue filing as MFJ. MFJ is one tax return filing for you both.
  7. nastra30
    And this should be my husband and I. It's a joint tax filing so you are equally filing with him whether your income is $0 or not. There's a reason he's filing MFJ because he's getting more money back in returns using his spouse (you). If he's filing as MFJ this year then you don't need to do anything extra, it's a joint filing. And the joint filing your income will be $0 if you earned no income last year. If you are guys are fling MFS this year, then you as an individual are not required to file if earned no income last year. Or you can still file with $0 income MFS, it's up to you.
  8. nastra30
    You guys won't continue filing as MFJ? 2025 tax retun filing is for income made in 2024, 2024 filing is for income made in 2023, and so forth. So since you started working this year (2024), your US income will included in 2025 tax filing.
  9. nastra30
    What about the children's grandparents (your parents)? Do they have the physical presence requirements to transmit citizenship to your kids?
  10. nastra30
    If you want your children to study in the US, you'll need to apply for F1 visa. It is not automatically given because you have approved I130.
  11. nastra30
    Awesome.
  12. nastra30
    Petition is void as soon he got married. Simple as that.
  13. nastra30
    Yes, it's allowed by law if you so choose. How old is daughter?
  14. nastra30
    Based on timelines you've provided, yes, petitioner can leave. Biometrics for I-130 is extremely extremely rare so don't worry about that. File online so you can get receipt pretty right away. Good luck.
  15. nastra30
    Op, why not file online; it's cheaper than paper filing.
  16. nastra30
    Ok got it. Safe to travel.
  17. nastra30
    No, N400 doesn't supersede I-751. They are still separate cases so essentially you will have two cases to get approved for. However, N400 will never get approved until I751 has been approved. Including a letter for combo is just a courtesy letter; they don't have to act on it. If you still wish to, you can still add it now as unsolicited. Nonetheless, you may still get a combo regardless especially if your field office is known for doing that. Even if don't get a combo, at least you gotten the N400 rolling and dodged the April fee increases. Good luck.
  18. nastra30
    Yes safe to travel. But if traveling with kids make sure dad is on board with them traveling unless you have full custody.
  19. nastra30
    I agree with you nonetheless. It's up to op whether to get to the US faster (and deal with any complexities later) or decide on starting on a clean slate (filling I-407) and waiting a couple+ years. Good discussion.
  20. nastra30
    Yes, NTA initiates the removal process. If that's what you meant then we are on same page as I already stated the case will become a court case if it gets to that point. But then again the courts are packed with more complex and frivolous cases. So no actual enforcement of removal will take place until case is heard. Another lifeline after USCIS denial is to file another I-130 and then right back in court to pause any removals + I-485.
  21. nastra30
    I'm confused. Why will they be in removal if they have a valid LPR status? Court hasn't weighed in yet.
  22. nastra30
    I think 'unlikely' is relative here. The immigration court is already backlogged so you can never know.
  23. nastra30
    I don't think interviewing officer has that authority to determine abandonment in this case. It will become a court case at that point if op is willing to fight it. Also, the person can't just enter and naturalize; they'll have to meet a fresh set of residency and physical presence requirements.
  24. nastra30
    Ahh I see, wife is the derivative not the principal.
  25. nastra30
    Ok so I'm a bit confused. Why would the CO say this? If the principal applicant is ineligible for a visa, every other derivative is ineligible.
×
×
  • Create New...