garebear397

You can go ahead and try the ESTA, it takes like 5 mins online -- but I am fairly confident that a previously denied visa is pretty much an automatic rejection of ESTA (my wife got denied for an ESTA because she had a denied visa 10 years ago, and she had to get a B2 visa instead). Its an automatic system, as far as I know there is no physical person that will look at the situation. Basically the idea of the ESTA is that anyone that has no marks on their records (so to speak) can get it, and any situation that is somewhat irregular has to go through the normal visa process, where a physical person can evaluate the case. Also -- K-1s have maybe a very minimal faster processing speed than CR1 just to be able to enter the country, but the overall process to obtain greencard is longer with a K-1 and more costly, and as others have mentioned during AOS (adjustment of status) in the US you can't work or leave the country for often times 6 months or more. Most everyone in this forum who has experience is going to reccomend a CR1 over K-1. And I would say the same, being someone who has gone through the K-1 route once (succesfully) and is in process for the CR1 visa right now.

Yes, I wouldn't reccomend withdrawing the I-130 even if like on the phone with the consulate they tell you to withdraw and file DCF. Because in the end the consulate agent will be giving their OK or not, and they might deny since you really don't live their yet, and would be specifically moving there to file. If they let you file for DCF without withdrawing the I-130, you can go for it. Like others have said it really varies on the consulate.

Yeah as others have said you most likely need to re-do the whole thing, get a more legitamate divorce to your Ex, and then apply for a spouse visa (through I-130). The K-1 should have never been an option. The K-1 isn't much faster, and creates headaches once the non US citizen is in the US. Also K-1s will be denied for any kind of marraige, including religious ceremonies that have no "legality", let alone an actual marriage in the UK where you even got a spousal visa from. This is why they are asking for a divorce from your current UK husband, because you can't do K-1 if you are any kind of married.

Yeah agreed. Definitely don't withdraw the I-130. Honestly even if you call and you present it like you are already living en Mexico and have a urgent job move (which would be the only reason in your case to file DCF), and then they tell you you can withdraw the I-130 and file through DCF -- I still wouldn't reccomend it. Because the interviewing officer could figure out, pretty easily, that this isn't a valid DCF case. Then you just lost all your waiting time on the I-130 and just have to file again.

Yeah I was going to comment the same -- it seems correct the quote, you are not guaranteed re-entry as a Green Card holder. Obviously the vast majority of the times it is not a problem, but it would also be wrong to say it is guaranteed. Like you said even the some-what "innocent" case of staying out of the country more than a year without filing a re-entry permit, could result in not entering the country.

Honestly if you have a willing relative or friend that easily qualifies for the amount based on liquid income that is usually the most straight-forward and easiest way to go. In general it seems like they prefer liquid assets when possible, and if you are both working professionals it is a pretty low risk that the co-sponsor would ever even be called upon. We are in the same position where we are both living in my spouses country, and will move together using my parents as co-sponsors.

Ah really? You don't have to pay the fee again?

Adding our experiences (because reading all your alls good experiences really helped our nerves!): - My wife is Chilean, we all live in Chile - She used to be a GC holder through our marriage, but we moved to chile about 4 years ago, and now are in process to move back to the US - She applied for and got a 10 year B2 visa last december, she had overstayed by a couple weeks on accident as a teenager, so that is why she couldnt use ESTA and had to apply for a B2 visa. We had not applied for the I-130 at that time, but she did have "risks" of being married to a US citizen and having 2 US citizen kids. But there was no issue with the approval of her B2 visa. - We all entered the US in April through JFK (before applying for the I-130): the CBP officer was a very harsh with us becase we all went to the US citizen line (because we asked and they told us to), but she said my wife wasn't a citizen and shouldn't be in this line so she chewed us out a bit. My wife was then called to the back room and another officer was super chill and just asked her about the ESTA thing and her old green card, and then let her pass through without problems. - We visited the US again just now in October through LAX (after applying for I-130), we were going to go to the visitors line as a family to not repeat the problem, but they saw us and said again we should go to the US citizens line as a family. This time the officer was very nice and only asked if she was a GC holder or not, and how long our stay was. Took our pictures and passed us through. Didn't mention anything about I-130, old GC, or ESTA issue. I do think each additional visit she makes and comes back to Chile will make it easier and easier for the CBP to pass her through. So we were very happy with the last visit!

Ahhh you are doing K-3. Yeah, its just not super common anymore, and can be a bit of a waste of money to pay for both applications. The way I understand it is that K-3 was made so that your spouse can enter the country as a non-immigrant while waiting for the I-130. But now both applications basically take the same time....so most people just do the I-130 and enter the country as residents.

Did you file a 1-130 and 1-129f?

Ah yeah, didn't notice that....if indeed the spouse is from Iran (or middle east in general) that will be a bigger challenge.

I mean obviously OP needs to just file the CR1. But the two points you made on the B2 visa and entering the US as a visitor with kids is really dependent on the situation and country of origin. I have read several cases that both of those actions (B2 visa and visiting) weren't a big problem, and from my own personal experience it also wasn't a big problem. We live overseas (myself and our two kids are US citizens), my wife was approved for a B2 visa with kids and everything without really any trouble, and we have done visits with the whole family to the US without really any problem. Also visiting the US with two small kids is not unheard of at all....especially if you are visting the US citizens family. Again, my wife is from a fairly low-risk country, so again it is super dependent on country of origin.

Seems like you definitely have the answer to your question. Just commenting that we did basically did the reverse (also at that time K-1s were a faster than CR1) -- and it sounds similar that for us the ceremony was much more significant to us than the legal part. So we got engaged, filed, my then fiance got her visa and entered the country about 10 months later, we got legally married literally the day after she arrived, and then after she got her green card (or could have been AP, we just got the green card first) about 6 months later, we had a ceremony in her home country. I wouldn't say I would reccomend that now, since as people said the CR1 basically takes the same time (and then you don't have to worry about adjusting status after you enter the country) -- so if the legal part of the marriage is not as sigificant to you as the ceremony then just get legally married quickly, and file the CR1, and then just have a ceremony afterwards (in whatever country you want).

Yeah from reading other people's posts it seems like that is a pretty common status, "taking longer than expected", and I don't think it means too too much. They probably just having something in the system that it should go from "Actively Reviewing" to some other status in 1-2 months and if it doesn't than it goes to "taking longer than expected". Mine just recently went to "Actively Reviewing" on september 12th, and still says 5 months. But yeah also not getting hopes up...just gotta be patient.

Correct me if I am wrong those with more experience, but the sponsor doesn't actually have to be living in the US even at the time of the interview/filing I-864 -- if they can show intent to re-establish domicile in the United States (opening bank accounts, job applications/job offer, enrolling kids in school etc.). Of course its still a bit easier to show domicile (rental agreements, house purchase, utility bills, etc.) than "intent ro establish domicile" if you want to play it safe. But it is an option for your spouse if they want to wait for you to move to the US.

Perfect. Yeah I figured a large part of parent sponsorships are from naturalized citizens...since the child obviously didn't get citizenship from their parents. But didn't know if the speed or intention was frowned upon at all.

Is there any issues with petioning a parent basically right after obtaining citizenship through naturalization? Basically we have a longer term plan to get my whole family and my wife's mother living in the US. Currently my wife is waiting for her IR1 visa, after she gets her green card we plan on applying for her citizenship after 3 years living in the US, and right after she gets her citizenship we plan on her petioning her mother (widow). Any potential issues doing everything back to back like that? On paper I don't see any issue...she will be a US citizen living in the US, we will have enough for the monetary sponsorship. But just wondering if anyone has any experience.

Didn't see a thread for June yet, so I will start one (though let me know if I missed it). We were married back in 2017, already went through the K-1 visa process and my wife got her green card, we lived in the US for 2 years and then for family reasons moved back to Chile. Now with two kids with us we are looking to move back state-side. Yay Round 2! Filed on June 4th online, recieved the Reciept Notice the same day and based on that document it looks like it will be processed in Virginia. I assume this is NOT the same as the official NOA1? I suppose that will come in the mail?