Jump to content

garebear397

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    116

  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • City
    Cincinnati
  • State
    Ohio

Immigration Info

  • Immigration Status
    IR-1/CR-1 Visa
  • Place benefits filed at
    Embassy
  • Local Office
    Cincinnati OH
  • Country
    Chile

Immigration Timeline & Photos

garebear397's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (5/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

69

Reputation

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. garebear397
    We were notified today by NVC that our interview is scheduled -- for February 5th!
  2.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  3.    Chris Lamb reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  4. garebear397
    Great news! We had just emailed our representative that was able to contact the NVC and said they were assigning interviews with people DQ in August (we were DQ August 30th) so hopefully we get an interview date soon.
  5.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: Marriage after tourist visa?
  6. garebear397
    Ahh ok, good to know. Only have seen some second-hand experiences, didn't know it was so risky.
  7. garebear397
    Did they overstay? Or did they get an extension? Those are two very different things. If they received an extension, and were always in status while in the US it shouldn't have much impact on future visa applications. Maybe could impact future tourist visa applications or US entries if it looks like they are trying to abuse their tourist visa (spend too much time in the US). Now if they overstayed (past their i-94 date without an extension), yes that could impact future visa applications for them and their family. But each case is unique. My wife overstayed on accident by a couple weeks when she was a teenager, and then she received several tourist visas afterwards, and a green card later on. They would always ask about it, but after her explanation there wasn't an issue. But like I said each case is unique and will depend on many different variables.
  8.    smilingstone reacted to a post in a topic: Advice on DIY vs a cheap service
  9.    SalishSea reacted to a post in a topic: Advice on DIY vs a cheap service
  10. garebear397
    Strongly seconded on all points. I would add if you do continue to pursue I would not add sending her money as part of your "evidence" of a relationship. It actually works to opposite effect as it appears that the marriage could be more of a financial transaction rather than a genuine "love" marriage.
  11.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: Advice on DIY vs a cheap service
  12. garebear397
    Agreed. That there shouldn't really be much of an issue, they admitted him every time with the ESTA and there is no reason to question his intent now, since he clearly has immigrant intent with the correct visa. The one question that could be an issue, that others mentioned, is if they question how he could stay for so long previously with the ESTA -- how could he afford or take so much time off work. If he worked while in the US on ESTA (even remotely for a non-US company) that is not permitted and could still be an issue now and potentially an issue for his AOS interview as well. Again....I think its very unlikely that this will come up when entering the country right now. But he should be prepared for whatever.
  13. garebear397
    Anyone who has completed the NVC DQ step? How long is it taking for the embassy to contact you after?
  14.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: Some questions about filing the 1-129F form/K1 Visa Packet from abroad?
  15. garebear397
    This seems like a good question for OP....because it sounds like they are staying in the UK and mentioned growing their career there. If that is the case, @msrodan you don't need any sort of visa. K1 is only for immigration intent of your fiance....they are perfectly fine to go a visit the US, get married there, and return back to the UK.
  16.    OldUser reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  17. garebear397
    This thread is only for spousal visas, so probably no one will reply for other family based. There is a different page/forum for other family based I130 visas, so I would check/post there.
  18. garebear397
    Ah ok ok. Thanks for the info! Yeah I think keeping it simpler here is the way to go.
  19. garebear397
    Yeah, fair enough "joint-sponsor" I should have said. Yeah I was only thinking of the I-864a since technically I live in the same physical house as my parents right now, until finding a new house. But I think I will go with just myself as the only sponsor. I do have a signed offer letter, with a start date already in the past. And can always provide more pay stubs when they come in for the interview. Thanks!
  20. garebear397 started following I-864 Petitioner just moved to US, new job, no pay stubs yet
  21. garebear397
    Wanted to get advice. We just made it past the USCIS stage of our spousal visa process, and now filling out the I-864. I (the petitioner) just started my new job in the US (living overseas with family the past 5 years) that is salaried and over the minimum income, but have yet to receive my first paycheck. Questions: - Should I only use myself as the sponsor (no co-sponsor)? Because technically I do make enough to cover the requirement, though I would only at this time have a signed offer letter that states my yearly salary. Though at the interview I would have a few more paychecks that my wife could show. - Or should I use a co-sponsor? I had previously asked my father to co-sponsor before I knew I would be moved up before my wife, so no problem there. And I was initially thinking to always include him even when I started my new job (basically just in case), but after reading the instructions better for the I864 I see it says "Form I-864A may only be used when a sponsor’s income and assets do not meet the income requirements of Form I-864." So that made me doubt my plan to include him regardless, since I do now technically earn enough. - If I do include my father as a co-sponsor, should I use the I-864A since currently I am living with him and my mom, until my wife moves up? Thanks for any help!
  22.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  23.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  24. garebear397
    Ahh ok, thanks for letting me know. I was checking every day because I figured it would be a quick turnaround. And yeah, I mean the money is already gone from my account so I assumed it would have been processed quickly. Another little wait then...
  25. garebear397
    Anyone else who is in the NVC stage, who can comment about how long it is taking to process the fee? I submitted both fees (AOS, and IV) on the 13th, and they still show just "In Process". It says it can take 2-3 business days, but just wondering if someone has already passed that step. Since you can't start doing the applications until the fees are processed.
  26.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  27.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  28.    UK_Dreamer reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  29.    garebear397 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  30.    Daughter of Zion reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  31.    Cookie88 reacted to a post in a topic: June 2023 I-130 Filers
  32. garebear397
    We got approved! PD of June 4th -- there is still hope for those who have earlier PD dates! We did write to our congressman on July 29th, their office contacted USCIS on July 30th, they got a response from USCIS on July 31st (see message below), and we were approved today on August 1st. So our process of contacting our congressman was very easy and quick, and who knows for sure but it might have helped spur the approval! Worth it for others still waiting to consider. USCIS response on July 31st: "USCIS records indicate that the case is located at the California Service Center and is currently pending background checks. We understand that your constituent may be frustrated by the progress of their case. Please know, USCIS is committed to adjudicating immigration benefits in a timely and efficient manner while also ensuring public safety, national security and compliance with all relevant directives. At this time, we are unable to provide you with a processing time."
×
×
  • Create New...