4 hours ago, Boiler said:

This could be interesting

 

 

YES!! Release it ALL.  Please....

And stop the false narrative that people were killed that day.  Total BS that anyone can see thru.

The subject of classified documents being unsecured was known prior to the election.  Why didn't Merrick Garland take action back then?  He needs to be fired or impeached for letting this debacle continue for months.

Why did Biden's lawyers have access to the documents?  Were they properly cleared for the level of classification of said documents?  If not, they should be facing prison time as well.

 Joe didn't have the right to take these documents and he admitted on national tv that he took them and thus committed a felony. He stole them. And as such he needs too be prosecuted. He won't be any more than Garland will be impeached, but he should be.  


 

On 1/9/2023 at 1:08 PM, Ban Hammer said:

my thoughts, as a conceal carry holder.

- whether the guy was shot in the back or not does not matter, he was in the middle of armed robbery.  nothing says the conceal carry holder has to shoot the perpetrator in the front

or give the perpetrator fair warning so he turns around.  "fair fight" does not play into this one bit.

- the shots fired after the threat was down and neutralized could well lead to charges.  the general rule of thumb is to shoot until the thread is neutralized and then cease fire.  rapid fire
is not an issue here - neutralizing the threat is, and plenty of hot lead to the torso tends to make that happen.  if the perpetrator is reaching for the firearm after he (or she) is horizontal

on the floor after being hit by "freedom seeds", then further appropriate action should be taken to neutralize that threat - by grabbing his firearm if safely able to, or by more shots. 
-  in summary, actions taken by the conceal carry holder should always be taken with with the mind that they may need to be defended in court.  i'm not seeing the shots after the
perpetrator was neutralized as being needed.

note - a head shot means no reloading

I was going to respond to @yuna628 when I saw your reply.  Couldn't have said it better.

I agree with others that the last shot was unnecessary, but... what if it had NOT been?  I have watched videos where a perp who was downed by gunfire got back up and fought again.  

ETA: Dead criminals don't commit future crimes,  nor do they sue those who killed them d.e.d.

On 1/9/2023 at 3:17 PM, B_J said:

I think that last shot could really get him in trouble.  Once he had possession of the other guy's gun, it is pretty hard to justify shooting him again.  There is no real way to argue that he felt threatened at that point. 

Not at all.  He's going to be just fine.

I remember certain long-time members here touting how effective masks were in preventing disease.  Some are still here, lurking in the wings.  Embarrassed?  IDK.  I know I would be.

But the corvette was locked.  Should mean the documents were secure enough too.  

"There's an ongoing process, and I cannot comment further."   

S

M

H
 

But Brandon is taking it SERIOUSLY.  After 6 years.

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

How hypocritical of these folks in LI.  Now if they demanded all lying politicians on all sides resign, then maybe they would have some credibility.

Hypocrisy.  The cornerstone of politicians.  

2 hours ago, Dashinka said:

Yep, didn't Biden say Trump was irresponsible in how he handled classified documents?  Seems he may have forgotten how irresponsible he was himself.  Btw, since the Chinese paid for the office at Penn, did they have access to it?

I know that last part was rhetorical.

Quote

Ivermectin's Effectiveness Proven Again; 72% Efficacy

800,000 people died in the USA for nothing.

72% effective in a double-blind study (again).  That makes it what, about 40-50X more effective than the toxic covid jabs that were "mandated"???

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/ivermectins-effectiveness-proven

Now, I will add that induction cooking is my new favorite.  Used to be propane (because the heat was more controllable than electric, which is simply ON or OFF, nothing in between unless one modifies the controls with PID). And induction heats MUCH faster than conventional electric.

On 1/10/2023 at 11:14 AM, OldUser said:

How is one supposed to make food during power cuts? Agreed, modern electric stoves are way more efficient than their gas counterparts, but so unrealiable during weather events...

Let's deal with facts.  There is a trade off...

 

Quote

Electric appliances such as cooktops, ovens, heaters and water heaters tend to be very efficient, in that almost all of the energy from the electricity is converted to usable heat, while propane appliances lose some of their energy through exhaust gases and unburned fuel. The efficiency of electric appliances may cut into the energy-cost advantage of propane, but the difference is unlikely to be big enough to offset the higher cost of electricity.

8 minutes ago, Boiler said:

George has responded he will not resign.

Good for him!!  This country NEEDS more corrupt politicians who are willing to lie outright like Biden.  The precedent has been set, and voted for.  Bigliest margin of victory in history, amirite?

I reckon it's ok for a former vice president to leave classified docs laying around for public use.  No need to put him in prison for violating national security.

Quote

New research in pre-print publication at the American Heart Association’s journal Circulation shows a link between free spike antigens produced by the mRNA Covid shots and a form of heart inflammation known as myocarditis.
 

Harvard Medical School researchers examined 16 adolescents and young adults hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital or Boston Children’s with post-vaccination myocarditis from January 2021-February 2022. The subjects had “markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein” in their blood, “unbounded by antibodies.”

 

https://beckernews.com/aha-study-48490/


We are supposed to follow the science, and listen to the experts, amirite?

9 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

21-Year-Old Air Force Academy Football Player Dies Suddenly

 

[...] The U.S. military requires all members (including those at the academies) to be fully vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines.  One wonders if Hunter Brown's tragic death is related to that.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/catherinesalgado/2023/01/10/21-year-old-air-force-academy-football-player-dies-suddenly-n1660608

Not any longer.  That "mandate" has been rescinded.  Far too late for far too many, unfortunately...

2 hours ago, Boiler said:

Seems the DoJ knew about this before the elections but kept in under wraps for unknown reasons.

Climate change and ivermectin suppression got in the way, I suspect.

26 minutes ago, Mike E said:

So surprising this didn’t surface before the 2022 mid terms. /s

Yes, I can only imagine all the "surprise" leaking out from under your armpits as you digest this scenario...

4 minutes ago, Boiler said:

George, the one in glasses, being sworn in.

Ahhh.  He has a long way to go to catch up to all of Biden's lies.  Best of luck to him, I guess.

I reckon some here who tend to remain in the left ditch will claim this is just a coincidence, or due to climate change.  

https://fb.watch/hVZEWQjD01 

A little light reading for those that still think the virus is something from a wet market.  (Too bad ole Steelballz isn't around to counter this information, eh?  We need more hospital janitors to give us medical advice.)

 

Quote

“The implication is that theU.S.Government authorized and funded the deployment of noncompliant biological materials on Americans without clarifying their “prototype” legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while maintaining a fraudulent pseudo- “regulatory” presentation to the public,” said Latypova.

“Most incredible is the fact that current Laws enacted by the United States Congress appear to make the coverup actions LEGAL!”

Under the PHE, medical countermeasures are not regulated or safeguarded as pharmaceutical products (21 USC 360bbb-3(k).

https://armedforces.press/2023/01/05/breaking-dod-controlled-covid-vaccines-from-the-start-under-national-security-program-lied-the-entire-time-were-never-safe-and-effective/

6 hours ago, Boiler said:

Forgive my ignorance, but I don't grasp the significance of this photo.  Can someone explain it in small words?

On 1/5/2023 at 10:23 PM, Mike E said:

That’s kinda aNOTHER lie. 

Fixed it for ya.

5 minutes ago, Mike E said:

If it was the big  thing why not lead with it in your OP?

But if is an issue for a Brazil, they can try to extradite him. Except that because a Brazil’s constitution doesn’t allow it to extradite its own citizens to other countries, the Brazil / U.S. extradition treaty doesn’t allow Santos to be extradited.  Because America does reciprocity. 
 

https://internationalextraditionblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/brazil1.pdf

 

So given Santos is innocent until proven guilty, and given he isn’t going to trial, the check fraud allegation is a nothing burger. 
 

And after that there is nothing left. 
 

Unless we want to weaponize politicians lying.  

And I do want to weaponize it.

 

Do you?

 

Because it's a nothing burger cuz THE BIG GUY didn't do it.  Please try and stick with the agenda.

2 hours ago, laylalex said:

I didn't actually say he shouldn't be seated, because under House rules he can be seated. The rules are the rules and that is that. I am actually trying to keep this focused on Santos rather than looking at what other people have done, so I'm not going to address Lindsay Graham or Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden. But I think the big thing here is that he was indicted for check fraud in Brazil and skipped out on it before the case could go forward. That says a lot about character and fitness to serve. Are there other members of Congress who have been indicted and then evaded prosecution for fraud? I honestly don't know. But to me, that IS a big deal. Others may disagree. 

 

We can say Biden lied about this or Graham lied about that, but I disagree that there is no difference between big and small lies. Lying about finishing college is kind of meaningless if you can do the job, and there's no requirement to have a degree. Lying about your expertise when you're leading people to believe that your expertise will help you be a more effective representative, yeah, I think that's more meaningful. Lying about your mom dying in 9/11 or your employees being gunned down in a mass shooting are just dumb lies, which point to someone who's, well, kind of dumb. Evading prosecution after you have confessed to a crime and then not telling your electorate about it, that's a big lie because it goes to character.

 

Hold everyone to account, absolutely. But we don't need to be nihilists about it.

What about politicians who lie about their sons dying in combat?