Jump to content

SalishSea

Members
  • Posts

    18,027
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Everything posted by SalishSea

  1. Great point. OP, this is probably the path of least resistance, particularly since any extreme EOs or other actions would hopefully be tied up in the courts for awhile. What is your husband's "resident since" date on his GC? He can file an N-400 90 days before that date.
  2. No, it is a 'family reunification' visa. Now that she went back home, there is no need for reunification.
  3. Since there is no precedent for any of this, we can only just speculate. I'm assuming that same-sex marriage continues to be legal in Columbia, where you married? If so, and you moved to a state that keeps it legal (like California), there would be no need to "remarry." In terms of the federal impact for US immigration, I can imagine they might take the approach the take towards marriage between first cousins: in order to receive an immigrant benefit, the petitioner must live in one of the states where cousin marriage is legal, as well as having married in a location where it is legal. Best of luck, and hopefully it doesn't come to extremes like having to move to another state.
  4. They will not expedite for that reason, no.
  5. Nope, sorry. No derivatives for IR. Get their I-130 petitions submitted asap.
  6. All K-1 interviews for Canada are done at the Montreal consulate.
  7. Are they still together, as in living in the same household? Because she did a K-1, she cannot adjust status in any other way. She is subject to deportation, which is becoming more likely every day.
  8. CBP will wonder how she has so many large blocks of time off from work? Remote work is prohibited on a tourist visa/ESTA.
  9. Such letters are not required and don't "help." There is also no sponsorship for B visas.
  10. If your income is marginal (as you’ve said in prior posts that it is) even to meet the sponsorship requirements, how would you afford their tuition?
  11. No. You can’t use the home where the intending immigrant is to live. Also- it could be 6-12 months before he is allowed to work. While an income shortfall may not be a big deal to you for the I-134, have you looked at the requirements for actually adjusting status? Sounds like you’ll need a joint sponsor.
  12. K-1 is not the best choice in your financial situation. Are you aware that the beneficiary will not be able to work for up to one year? In any case, you will need a joint sponsor.
  13. They haven't taken live calls in years.
  14. Then he has a conditional green card and will have to remove conditions on it when eligible.
  15. The VJ search function is hit or miss, but if you are able to try it out, there are many examples and stories of couples who have successfully obtained spousal visas this way. Wish I could remember someone to tag here. Maybe another VJ member will tag someone.
  16. Not sure that PCCs from Pakistan are ever accepted by the DOS? They don't accept them at NVC. The extra efforts involved in satisfying the background checks for Pakistanis is what contributes to the extended APs.
  17. It is because of Pakistan's poor criminal record-keeping processes. Nothing you can do about it.
  18. Not possible. The EAD will not be approved if the I-485 is denied. You will need a joint sponsor.
  19. What is your plan for the I-864 adjustment of status in that case? If he/she cannot improve income or obtain a joint sponsor by then, expect it to be denied.
  20. If you have legal status in another country, you can request to be interviewed there. It will not be faster, particularly for Pakistanis, who often end up in protracted AP.
  21. There is zero expectation for fiances to have commingled finances, such as joint bank accounts. Photos as relationship evidence are secondary, and relationship evidence is not even asked for at the petition phase. Evidence of fulfilling the requirement to have met once in the two years prior is best met with boarding passes/passport stamps, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...