Jump to content

SalishSea

Members
  • Posts

    17,583
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    78

Everything posted by SalishSea

  1. And while you’re having these tantrums about how victimized you feel, you are not even acknowledging the good advice and solutions you’re getting in this thread. Makes people think you just want to whine and be entitled, rather than taking action to fix your situation.
  2. It’s likely just not been updated. Sometimes they never are. Your case is in AP.
  3. What do you mean “migrated to live with me”? That is absolutely not allowed on a tourist visa.
  4. Whether he is required to pay for her attorney is not related whatsoever to immigration. It may be ordered by the court overseeing the divorce, yes. But again, not related to immigration. And I agree that she should just cut her losses and go home. She has no path to a green card other than via that marriage.
  5. Do you have an actual question?
  6. No, there is no such requirement. The I-864 he signed is a contract with the United States government to repay them for any means-tested benefits she obtains.
  7. Very unlikely. Has nothing to do with “millions of illegal immigrants crossing the border” and more to do with the behavior of others from your country, deciding not to go back.
  8. It won’t fix the problem of you needing to obtain a corrected certificate of naturalization prior to filing.
  9. The immigrant you want to sponsor has an AWA/CiMT crime history, which makes him inadmissible. And per your other comment, not sure why you think that won’t be an issue for Canada?
  10. Why do you think CBP is in any way part of evaluating public charge risk? That is only done by consular officers.
  11. I feel like maybe there is a language barrier or just a huge void in understanding how things work here, for OP. In the title, the "change country" bit makes me think she believes she can just have him interview for that family preference visa in the US instead.
  12. Incorrect. The evidence of a marriage ending is either by death certificate or decree of dissolution. Someone who is "widowed" and wants to petition a new spouse must show evidence of having been legally able to marry that person, aka the death certificate.
  13. No issue. It is pretty clearly an informal photo, not even taken at a ceremony. Where people get into trouble is primarily in cultures where they have elaborate formal engagement ceremonies (with guests, fancy outfits etc) that can be mistaken for weddings. You guys are fine.
  14. Not sure why everyone is so focused on the medical. The only thing relevant here is that the visa holder MUST enter the US before the visa expires. OP, you need to marry within 90 days of her being admitted on a K-1 visa.
  15. NO. Does she have a valid visa already? She MUST enter before the K-1 expires, which is six months from the medical.
  16. Why was this done? Sounds deliberate, which makes NO sense. Shooting yourself in the foot.
  17. Joint sponsor does not need to be USC. Can be LPR. Joint sponsor's US domicile does not replace the requirement for the petitioner (USC) to have domicile/intent to establish.
  18. For precisely this reason. To establish marital status as the time of naturalization, as that impacts a citizen's eligibility to petition others.
  19. Marriage will not solve this problem. If the record shows that the OP is "widowed," he will be required to provide a death certificate as evidence of current marriage being legal.
  20. Right. My point is that one can infer from the timeline that the current relationship (from meeting to marriage) may have been quite quick. That is what could draw scrutiny for the adjustment.
  21. Okay, that will be good documentation to have for your case.
  22. Not an immigration obstacle per se, but the picture OP paints (with ex GF currently pregnant, and now adjusting status via someone else), the timing of the AOS marriage could raise questions.
×
×
  • Create New...