Crazy Cat
-
Posts
39,631 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
674
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by Crazy Cat
-
Logical, unbiased analysis in my opinion. By law, this is self defense, imho. Her face expression is irrelevant. Her words are irrelevant. Her ACTIONS and the officer's perception of those actions in those 2 seconds are relevant. -
If he feared for his life in that split second, this is self defense. Game over..... It's actually cut and dry. Add, to the facts. that he actually hit him.
-
How To Commit Democratic Party Suicide
Crazy Cat replied to TBoneTX's topic in Current Events and Hot Social Topics
Pretty low bar....and he failed. -
The former mob boss guy speaks it like it is.....
-
I read (but haven't verified) that they moved to Canada after Trump was elected, then had just recently moved to Minnesota.
-
I agree with the others...no ROC required...as long as the "resident since" date is correct on your 10 year card, you are in good shape.
-
It is rebellion against federal law. One could argue it is insurrection.
-
After the first shot, was she still behind the wheel? Was the car still moving?
-
After 1 shot, She was still at the wheel of a moving car.....threat was not neutralized after the initial shot.
-
Not even to to the same situation "The officer fired the final volley—shots five and six—after Hernandez had collapsed on the ground. He was on his back with his knees curled up to his chest, rolling away from the officer."
-
Normal. They are different entities.
-
Irrelevant, imo. The officer can fire multiple times to ensure a threat has been neutralized.
-
For the benefit of those who haven't seen the video of the officer being hit and pushed back:
-
Striking an officer with a deadly weapon will result in poor outcomes....every time.
-
You haven't seen the video which shows he was struck and pushed back?
-
Certainly looks, to me, like she struck him.
-
I have seen a video which does show he was struck.
-
Here is a suggested reform: Don't interfere with federal law enforcement actions. Take your grievance to the courts.
-
Why did the woman go there to interfere with federal law enforcement actions? Why do Walz and Frey defy federal law? Why was MPD barred from helping ICE in this "known" hostile neighborhood? Lots of reasonable questions to be answered. There needs to be accountability......in Minnesota.
-
Well said...... Life doesn't happen in slow motion......Officers have to make split-second decisions....in real time.
-
Yes, there is. and that right there is the key.....If he felt his life was in danger, lethal force is authorized. " Deadly force should not be used against persons whose actions are a threat solely to themselves or property unless an individual poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others in close proximity."
-
I'm sure there is other video. The officer who was struck was actually videoing the driver just before she accelerated. I am hoping for a thorough investigation.
-
That is not true....there is video showing the officer in front of the vehicle when she accelerated, and another video showing she struck the officer with her car.
-
In a split second? That is only in the movies....not real life. The officer acted within the law, imo, by neutralizing the threat. Walz and Frey are insurrectionists.
-
Walz and Frey are insurrections, imo. They are rebelling against Federal law.
