Crazy Cat

USCIS will not issue an expired card. You should make an appointment with USCIS to get an ADIT stamp. No I-90 is required. Your extension letter is worthless without the expired card.

Police certificates must be uploaded to NVC before they will qualify the case. Civil Documents

I have seen another case where a CO did that already. Doesn't make sense to require 2024 tax year documents. Does your wife have income? If not, then that might explain why they want you to be a Joint Sponsor. @pushbrk is a guru for these situations. He can probably clarify some of this. Good luck.

Yes. She is the primary sponsor.

**OP, Please don't repost as a new thread. Post additional info to this thread***

It is frustrating, but it is usually a path of least resistance to just give them what they want: Looks to me like you need to: 1. Get the medical done (if not already) 2. Primary sponsor completes a new I-864 3. You complete an I-864 as joint sponsor 4, Supply transcript and/or tax return package for the latest tax year (not sure why they want 2024 already) for both I-864s...along with current annual income documentation. 5. Copy of petitioner and joint sponsor's passport Upload those documents and this letter to CEAC. Then send copies of those and the applicant's passport to the consulate through LBC. Hopefully, that will satisfy them. Good luck.

***The above post was split from a 14 year old thread. An old quote has been removed***

This 14 year old thread is now locked for further comments. Comment split to new topic***

Every couple has their own priorities, and each couple must decide which visa is better for their situation. K-1 More expensive than CR-1 Requires Adjustment of Status after marriage (expensive and requires a lot of paperwork) Spouse can not leave the US until she/he receives approved Advance Parole (approx 3-6 months) Spouse can not work until she/he receives EAD (approx 3-6 months) Some people have had problems with driver licenses, Social Security cards, leases, bank account during this period Spouse will not receive Green Card for many months after Adjustment of Status is filed. A K-1 might be a better choice when 18-21 year old children are immigrating also In some situations, marriage can affect certain Home country benefits, making a K-1 a better choice A denied K-1 is sent back to USCIS to expire K-1 entrant cannot file for citizenship until after having Green Card for 3 years. Once an I-129F has been approved, delaying the case is difficult to impossible if the need arises. CR-1/IR-1 Less expensive than K-1 No Adjustment of Status(I-485, I-131, I-765) required. Spouse can immediately travel outside the US Spouse is authorized to work immediately upon arrival. Spouse receives Social Security Card and Green Card within 2 or 3 weeks after entering the US Opening a bank account, getting a driver's license, etc. are very easily accomplished with GC, SS card, and passport. Spouse has legal permanent Resident status IMMEDIATELY upon entry to US. The clock for citizenship filing starts immediately upon entry to the US. A CR-1/IR-1 case can be delayed indefinitely at NVC if the need arises.

Has she been properly filing taxes? If not, that is going to be a problem.

***Multiple hijack comments from various threads removed. Please keep the conversation regarding this topic under this thread. Spamming is not allowed***

***One hijack and repost removed. Please ask your own questions in a new thread***

***Non-contributory comment removed***

That is not a mistake. That is gross income.

That is correct. "Gross income" = before taxes, deductions.

You are correct in that: - Denied entry due to lack of ties to home country would not affect a K-1. - A person can visit the US via a B2 while a K-1 (for example) is pending. There is a Mega-thread on that very subject here. In addition, many, many people visit while K-1s and spousal visas are pending. However, every visit is at the discretion of CBP if they think a person is just trying to bypass the long waits associated with the legal immigration process. - Denied entry would not be a guaranteed ban. However, your GF is already on CBP's radar. The most troubling aspect is "The agent was aggressive from the start and insinuated that my girlfriend was working illegally". There are documented cases, here on VJ, in which that exact issue has resulted in expedited removal and an automatic 5 year ban. CBP needs only suspicion. That would affect any re-entry attempt in the future for 5 years. - There is no clear guidance as to what determines abuse of a B2 or what circumstances dictate denial of entry. Those are purely subjective on the part of CBP officers. Good luck on rest of the journey. This is a great place for info and sharing. Most of us are not licensed to give legal advice, but we sometimes spot bad advice given by those who are.

Please elaborate.

***Old thread locked. Please ask questions regarding this subject as a new topic thread***

On the I-130, you must indicate whether she will seek Consular Processing or Adjustment of Status within the US.....You should not choose both. If you indicate Adjustment of Status, the I-130 would not be forwarded to NVC (if she later decided to do consular processing instead). At that point, in order to move the approved I-130 to NVC, you would file an I-824 ($590), and it would delay the case for a year. If you indicate Consular Processing on the I-130, she could still apply for Adjustment of Status without delaying the case. Bottom line: Choosing Consular Processing allows either consular process or Adjustment of Status (under some circumstances). In your situation, you are not 100% sure which route she will take.

Great point!!!!!!! Choose Consular processing....not AOS on the I-130.

Bad idea. Never give USCIS information they don't need. Your question is a good one. However, if you answer "Yes", USCIS will demand a formal document for termination of the marriage. The attorney has already determined that she was never legally married. Logically, the answer is "No", imo.

**Split from existing thread***

Filing an I-485 before her I-130 date is current will be an immediate denial. I suggest you take a look at the latest Visa Bulletin Table B. Become an "A student" of the process before taking any big steps. She is under F2A category.

Correct, but history shows that some COs start requiring them earlier than that.

That is quite a decision with enormous and lasting consequences.